Since the days of the Cuban Missile Crisis (Marfleet, 1997) in the sixties, the United States has become increasingly more relaxed as to the possibility of an attack on American soil. Since the attack on the Twin Towers in September of 2001, by the terrorist group al-Qaeda, the United States has again become more aware and alert to this possibility. Not only did the attack on the United States bring Americans together as a country united, it also brought on changes that included the newly developed Department of Homeland Security. Homeland Security is now charged with not only protecting the country and territories from another terrorist attack but also responding to an attack, man-made accident, and natural disasters. It is also responsible for monitoring the current threat of an attack against the United States.
The United States and the newly formed Department of Homeland Security (Department of Homeland Security) also watch which groups are the greatest threats against the United States. Al-Qaida still tops the list as the greatest threat to our country. Until recently Homeland Security had listed Osama Bin Laden as the leader of the group which tops the terrorist watch list. In May of 2011 (White House) the U.S. Navy, SEAL Team Six, killed Bin Laden in an early morning raid of his compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. With this removal of this terrorist leader, America now has a new threat.
In a press conference in February of 2011, National Counterterrorism Center Director Michael Leiter stated “I actually consider Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, with Al-Awlaki as a leader within that organization, is probably the most significant risk to the United States homeland.” Anwar Al-Awlaki is a dual citizen on both the U...
... middle of paper ...
...t still seems another attack is not a question of “If” we will be attacked, but “when” we will be attacked.
Works Cited
Barack Obama Job Approval. (2011). Retrieved July 29, 2011, from Gallup Poll: http://www.gallup.com/poll/116479/barack-obama-presidential-job-approval.aspx
Department of Homeland Security. (n.d.). Retrieved July 29, 2011, from Department of Homeland Security: www.dhs.gov
Kouri, J. (2011, 02 11). Congress grills homeland security, intelligence officials. Retrieved July 29, 2011, from Renew America: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kouri/110211
Marfleet, B. G. (1997). "The Operational Code of John F. Kennedy During the Cuban Missile Crisis: A Comparison of Public and Private Rhetoric". Thinkquest.
White House. (n.d.). Retrieved July 29, 2011, from Statements and Releases: http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/Statements-and-Releases
Narco-Terror: the United States, the Drug War, and the War on Terror Introduction The United States has had a long-standing policy of intervening in the affairs of other nations when the country has thought it within its best interests to do so. Since the 1970’s the United States has tried to impose its will on other nations to combat the most pressing political enemy of the day often linking the war on drugs to the matter to stoke support both domestically and abroad. In the times of the
United States is the Super Power in today’s world and two reasons for that are the outcome of World War II and how the President at the time, Franklin Delano Roosevelt handled conflicts at home as well as overseas. America was going through a very difficult time dealing with the Great Depression and the problem of Germany starting conflicts in Europe where nothing was being done about it. World War II was something America stayed out of for about three years, but when we finally did get involved the
Realist thought on international relations fit comfortably within the context of the great wars of the twentieth century. Powerful nations possessing massive military forces took aim at one another to affect the hierarchical structure of the international system for the good of their own security and power. These wars, however, differ greatly from today’s unconventional war on terrorism. Therefore, the realist theories of yesterday, while still useful, require at least some tweaking to fit the present
Bush's War On Terror and the Erosion of Civil Liberties Nearly all the amendments in the Bill of Rights have been reduced since the beginning of the war. The fourth through eighth amendments have been especially hit hard by this “war.” Search & seizure, due process, a speedy and public trial with a jury, and cruel & unusual punishment have all been disregarded as part of the current administration’s policy. The “War On Terror” has effectively eroded the civil liberties that Americans fought
The War Against Terror and China's Treatment of the Uigher Ethnic Minority In the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, President George W. Bush reached out to the world to back the U.S. in a war to eradicate terrorism. One of the more surprising participants in this coalition, China, had until that point been at odds with U.S. policy but seemed to find sufficient common ground with the U.S. to support the war. In recent months however, China has not been lauded
War on Terror On September 11, 2001, our country was hit with enormous devastation, just after eight o’clock a.m. the first of the twin towers was struck by a suicide pilot, the second was struck slightly later. The towers fell just after ten o’clock a.m., devastating the entire country, and ruining the lives of many. A plane also hit the Pentagon in Washington D.C., and another in rural Pennsylvania causing just as much grief. The U.S. is still in mourning, but standing tall, more Americans showed
since the Civil War (Terrorism, 2011). This even had an enormous influence on America and its history. It led to numerous short and long term effects. On September 20, 2001, former president George W. Bush announced publicly that he declares “War on Terror”. After this announcement, our country has altered. To determine if an effect was positive or negative, determines on the view point of the person. Some of those effects include; USA Patriot Act, creation of TSA, the War, and issues soldiers
Machiavelli presents very specific advice on how a ruler can maintain stability and control over his newly acquired state. Machiavelli lived in a time when a ruler could come to possess another kingdom through the simple act of war. Yet, in our modernity, a ruler cannot simply declare war and occupy a territory. He must also face repercussions from the other world powers that are in existence today. Our time has evolved and a ruler now has to take into consideration the opinions of other world powers along
The War on Terror is a military campaign enacted by George W. Bush to fight terrorism following the attack on 9/11 conducted by al-Qaeda according to thebalance.com. The War on Terror also included the Iraq War. The Iraq War was a long time coming with the hostility and aggression of the country. Iraq continued to resist attempts at peace made by both the United States and the United Nations. The twelve years of diplomacy employed by Iraqi officials was just a facade, a tactic to stall for more time
How the United States Has Been and Is Fighting Terror Matt Ruiter Professor Buchanan POS 111 25 November 2015 On September 11, 2001 the United States finally understood the reality of terrorism. As people watched The World Trade Center collapse, terrorists became more than a group of Muslims in the Middle East. After that fateful day, terrorism became a real threat, and the United States declared war on Terror. Since then, American soldiers have been sacrificing their lives to keep the United
(1832) “war is… an act of force to compel our enemy to do our will” (p. 75). The War on Terror is no different. As the U.S. continues to “pursue a strategy for the world we seek” (The White House, 2011, p. 2), we must recognize that our adversaries are doing the same. Thus, the War on Terror is a war of ideas, “ideas powerful enough to provoke violent emotions” (Echevarria, 2003, p. 15) resulting in wanton violence and a blatant disregard for human life. It is this aspect of the War on Terror, the
The War On Terror. It is a name that brings many strong thoughts and emotions to mind for Americans still to this today. It is has been Americas longest war, most expensive war, and a deadly conflict. All in all, the Iraqi War from 2003 to 2011 brought a cost of 500,000 lives from civilians to militants (Vergano 1). Among the U.S. army alone it is estimated that around 900,000 veterans have had some form of injury ranging from PTSD to amputations (Ruis 1). Not to mention, many experts say once all
to the attacks, the United States declared a “War on Terror.” However, the actions of the U.S. did not come without criticisms from the people of the nation. President George W. Bush demanded the Taliban leaders to “. . .close terrorist training camps. Hand over leaders of the al-Qaeda network, and return all foreign nationals, including
The Cold war and the War on Terror are two things that are being tied together as they are compared and contrasted for their similar and not so similar perspectives. While going through the sources I found, it became clear that some of the points of similarity and difference between two wars were the problems prior to both of these wars that increased and led to more tensions during the wars, how paranoia of the people living during this time, and how they both effect modern day America. The start
he would call them, or the corporations and politicians that control the mass media in our country. He speaks of how the U.S. government used propaganda in order to gain support for our country’s involvement in wars from Wilson’s presidency to Bush Sr., and now in our so-called “War on Terror” brought upon by George W. Bush. He explains how he believes this elite group of people control the minds of those that are less educated, and without an open minds. He believes that propaganda has been used through