War On Wealth Isn T Just Stupid It's Wrong Rhetorical Analysis

Assignment
Submitted By
Yours Name here
Submitted To
Yours Instructor Name here

To Meet the Needs of the Course
Nov., 2015.

War on wealth isn’t just stupid—it’s wrong is an article which is written by Michael Medved. In this article the author has discuss the different issues about the economical aspect that are related to the individual and government level. Author has focus on the taxing policies and has criticized the unfairness in those policies. Along with this discussion author has also discussed the points which could be used as the solution for unfairness in taxing policies. In this essay I will presents rhetorical analysis o this essay with different point of view. I will discuss the use of ethos, logos, pathos and also discuss

Throughout the article, author simply has presented his very own ideas and perception aside from the reference of President Obama's ideas about taxing the riches. In spite of the fact that this source which author has utilized for his argument helps author's credibility however this one ought not to be sufficient. As the title of the article is exceptionally expansive, so the author ought to need to give reference of other believable sources too which could be the economic reports and economical turnovers every year, feedback on present and past economical approaches. Be that as it may, article does not have the same level of adequacy and engages ethos. At a few parts of the article the author has benefited work with respect to the ethos. For instance author depicts the answer for making this circumstance great and fair for all. He says that the most ideal approach to vanquish the ordinary populist slant for the all inclusive community over the serious is through fervent affirmation of another long-standing national regard: the conviction that productive behavior benefits favored results and more backing over destructive,

His introduction is full of emotionally-charged words and phrases that create a sympathetic image; author says that ach kind-hearted individual can feel sympathy for the disheveled destitute panhandler on the dumps line, however that doesn't make it a smart thought to encourage his life in the city uncertainly. A sympathetic society rightly plans to save its minimum fortunate individuals, however advancing the continuation and expansion of destructive behavior does no favors for the downtrodden. This announcement of author brings out of the difficulties and vulnerabilities of being contribution of middle class individuals in such circumstance, and also the high emotions kind hearted American feels around then viably present the contention and its earnestness. His goal is to make the reader and in particular the American politicians, American policy conservative policy makers to comprehend the fact that present war of riches in any capacity is a stupid and wrong act. Another feeling that the author reinforces with his word choice is the concept of revealing wrongs with wealth war and getting rich; “dysfunctional values, fairness, moral inversion, bedraggled homeless” and some other