War Horse

1870 Words4 Pages

My topic for this report is “War should not be a place for children.” I decided to do this topic because i was inspired by the film War Horse directed by Steven Spielberg. In the film there were two young German boys who were sent to war underage and they were killed. This inspired me to do this topic because i was interested about how the events of World War 1 has impacted on the use of child soldiers today. It also made me curious about the consequences for the children and the society of children fighting in wars. In War Horse the boys were killed by their own army for desertion which showed me that once children begin to fight they are no longer considered children, and their punishments are reflected by this. My three questions i will …show more content…

During World War 2 the enlistment age was repeatedly lowered to bring in recruits. In Germany the age was lowered to 16 and there is photographic evidence of Hitler standing with “Tank hunting” children who were definitely below the age of conscription. The British age was lowered to 18 during World War 2. These ages have had an impact on the current ages. The US army has an enlistment age of 17 and Canada’s is 16. Britain’s is 16.5 and the British Army has stated that 40% of their enlistments are between 16 and 17. The official deployment age for all these countries is still 18 as sending anyone below that age into a conflict is illegal. My second source focuses more on the use of child soldiers in civil wars. There are many methods and means of getting child soldiers involved illegally in conflicts. Emmanuel Jal spoke of his own situation and how they manipulated his point of view to lay the blame on someone. This lead to his need for revenge and ultimately his involvement in a conflict dubbing him a ‘child soldier.’ He discovered that ”What was actually killing us wasn’t the Muslim, wasn’t the Arabs. It was somebody sitting somewhere manipulating the system, and using religion to get what they want to get out of us. Which is the oil, the diamond, the gold and the land.” This hierarchy model has been seen often in history, particularly in civil wars. There is an …show more content…

Children being involved in war had consequences for them and society. A short term result is the death of the children. This loss can have a big impact on the society and their family. This can develop into a long term issue because the number of children alive from that generation can begin to dwindle. The population of the villages also decreases. My second question was about how history has impacted the use of child soldiers, I have come to the conclusion that it has impacted it significantly in two ways, the lowered enlistment age for army’s and the multitude of civil wars in the world today. These civil wars are started by greedy, powerful and cruel people. I found that in some cases these civil wars are rebellions against unfair and unjust governments which escalate to unnecessary proportions and do more damage instead of fixing the original problems. The laws in place deter most countries in the world but failed states and internal conflicts can reach a point where law and order is no longer enforced. This is when the illegal use of child soldiers can become a regular ideology. The results of this can be seen today in countries such as Somalia where hundreds of children are killed each year in conflicts. These children are viewed as collateral damage. In my opinion children should never be

Open Document