War And Foreign Policy Under Napoleon 's Regime

1137 Words5 Pages
So here is where historians have questioned war and foreign policy under Napoleon’s regime. Many are adamant in saying the constant wars all over the continent that were his trademark was the result of the Old Order overthrowing the French Revolution as well its ideals. The transition of the French army from the Old Order to the Imperial Grande Armee hints at the idea that Napoleon was just making it up as went along. Over the years from First Consul to Emperor he expanded the army with intent of waging war even if it was not perfectly clear quite yet. Also, it was here that his tendency to scramble instead of plan out became more noticeable and he made use of his strategy, weapons, and troops better than his enemies did as well as making fewer mistakes while exploiting theirs. The Emperor "never had a tactical plan, and only vague strategic ones. His success resulted as much from 'scrambling ' as from genius". It’s also very important to see how often it wasn’t his scrambling or strategy that led to victory but rather the failure of his enemies. Tsar Alexander I was foolish in accepting the terrain in which Napoleon chose to fight and overruling his commanding general led to defeat until at least Moscow. In Prussia the Duke of Brunswick was poorly chosen and the disarray of their hierarchy was quietly picked up by the Emperor and exploited; had they been organized their reserves could have actually tipped the scales in their favor but as always Napoleon’s adversaries had a habit of presenting him with opportunities for exploitation. Napoleon not only reformed the army by introducing the corps system, but more importantly he understood military aspirations, rewarding his men with medals and honors, “all of which helped ens... ... middle of paper ... ...lapsed from this treatment going on far too long. Napoleon Bonaparte was a soldier with illusions of grandeur that has been seen as a great military leader and ruler for decades. However close examination of his motives and character as a man shows that he was nothing more than a soldier taking advantage of the opportunities given to him to satisfy his never ending thirst for conquest and glory. Hubris and an inferiority complex led to a reign of never ending warfare that would ultimately leave the world with a new impression of what fighting was all about as well as showcasing that all the success he had as a commander were just instances of taking from others and passing it off as his own. His legacy may glorify him but diving deeper into the legend reveals a childish man on a power trip who didn’t care of suffered or stood in his way as long as he got what wanted.

More about War And Foreign Policy Under Napoleon 's Regime

Open Document