WWII Case Study

1064 Words3 Pages
Over one hundred thousand United States citizens were imprisoned and relocated during World War II because they were of Japanese ancestry. Because of the attack on Pearl Harbor and the resulting declaration of war against Japan, many Americans worried that Americans of Japanese descent would act as spies, allowing another attack or, even worse, an invasion to occur on American soil. This fear and paranoia drove President Franklin D. Roosevelt into signing the Executive Order 9066 and Congress into issuing statues that allowed the relocation, exclusion, and limiting of rights for Japanese Americans throughout the duration of WWII. Questions over the legality of these acts would be brought up and decided upon in a series of court cases two of which were: Hirabayashi v. United States 1943 and Korematsu v. United States 1944. By looking at these court opinions we can learn the reasoning for certain rulings and how these rulings could show the fear and paranoia that ran rampant in American during the 1940s.
Court opinions follow a certain formula which needs to be understood first before someone could just jump into a case. First piece of information you will see on a court case opinion is the title of the case. It tells us which party brought the lawsuit to the court and which party is being sued. The next bit of information would be the history and facts of the case along with the laws and legal principles associated with it. This would be followed by the main ruling or the “majority opinion” of the court. Justices’ issue opinions of the court to explain what the case is about, discusses the legal principles that are relevant to the case, and then explain how those principles were applied to the facts of the case in order to reach ...

... middle of paper ...

...t to prevent other cases about the legality of Executive Order 9066 and the corresponding congressional statues from coming up again by stating that during times of war the United States has the authority to restrict rights of individuals in order to secure national defense.
What we cannot learn from these rulings and court cases was how these cases would affect the lives of the Japanese Americans after the war had ended. They can however tell us about the views of what was constitutional during that time period. It can give us an idea of what that time was like…
When the order was repealed, many found they could not return to their hometowns. Hostility against Japanese Americans remained high across the West Coast into the postwar years as many villages displayed signs demanding that the evacuees never return. As a result, the interns scattered across the country.
Open Document