In the politics of voting, the simple belief that everyone has the right to voice their opinion can become more conflicting when it comes to the mathematics in the polls. Most people believe that their next door neighbor simply cancels out their vote primarily due to a two party system. Despite the “two party” stance, there are usually several independent candidates.
The article proposes several ways to manage them in order to get the most votes to the primary candidates without the independents deferring them. When they are deferred, most voters wind up getting a winner that they did not support. Usually in this case, the people who voted for an independent candidate lose not only their preferred choice, but their secondary choice as well.
This leads to many unhappy voters and the result is an election that could have gone very differently, if the voting process used a somewhat different method.
This voting method article proposes the “Condorcet Method” in order to prevent independent votes from affecting the other candidates. Most people believe that this is not mathematically possible because of the logic of the displaced votes. It also doesn’t favor or reward exaggerated voting. The article claims that the Condorcet method protects these properties. The Electoral College aside, every voter gets and equal chance without hurting the others chances no matter how many are running. By adding a feature called “Preferential
Voting”, it allows voters to vote for more than one candidate. Voters can make their selections from the list given to them on their ballots. This way, voters can make several choices on one ballot and still not take any votes away from the other candidates.
The “Plurality Vote” metho...
... middle of paper ...
...the people who elected them. When they get in, they try to lead their party rather than the masses due to the fact that the party was the real ones that put them there.
Both of these are correct in a number of ways that I do believe in. I’m also intrigued with the “Borda Count”. At first it sounds like the current system where voters pick only one, but due to a process of elimination that takes place over an extended period of time rather than a single election night, people wind up properly picking the Condorcet winner instead. Since an election here in the U.S. basically takes over a year anyway with heavy campaigning, I would encourage the American public to gives these two methods a try.
Works Cited
Voting Research - Voting Theory Paul Cuff - Sanjeev Kulkarni - Mark Wang - John Sturm
http://www.princeton.edu/~cuff/voting/theory.html
Report on Winner-Take-All "Winner-take-all” is a term used to describe single member district and at large election systems that award seats to the highest vote getters without ensuring fair representation for minority groups. In the United States, these are typically single-member district schemes or at-large, block-voting systems. Under winner-take-all rules, a slim majority of voters can control 100% of seats, leaving everyone else effectively without representation. There's something else troubling about the way we elect presidents--something beyond the personal attacks, the derelict voters and the influence of big money. It is the fact that so many of those who do vote don't have their votes counted.
Since the electoral system can change the outcome of the election, it often misrepresents the will of citizens. In electoral system, candidate with most popular votes in states wins electoral votes regardless of difference in popular votes. That means, if people living in urban areas support one candidate, they could easily mislead the results of popular votes. Smaller areas with more population often drag results on one side than larger areas with less population. Either it is a presidential election of 1888 or 2000 election, candidates with higher electoral votes happen to win against people’s popular votes.
Plurality Vote: A Reappraisal? Political Studies. Sheffield: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Colman, A. M., 1992. Arguments against proportional representations.
Every four years, the citizens of America migrate to their respective polling locations and cast their vote. On this important day, the second Tuesday of November, the next President of the United States is elected. The election race for United States presidential candidates undergo a political marathon, negotiating primaries, party conventions and an electoral college system along the way. The electoral college is one of the main aspect of a presidential election. The Electoral College is made up of electors in each state, who represent the states popular vote. Each presidential party or candidate designates a group of electors in each state, equal to the States electoral votes, who are considered to be loyal to that candidate, to each State’s
Contrary to what may seem logical, majority votes under a compulsory voting system do not necessarily represent accurate opinion. Rather, compulsion encourages apathy, characterized by “a lack of concern, enthusiasm or interest” ("Definition of Voter Apathy"). In essence, voter apathy “occurs when voters decide that they really don’t care who wins or loses” ("Definition of Voter Apathy") due to “a general feeling that a person’s vote doesn’t matter or even a distrust in regards to how the election is actually being run” ("Definition of Voter Apathy").
Voting is at the center of every democratic system. In america, it is the system in which a president is elected into office, and people express their opinion. Many people walk into the voting booth with the thought that every vote counts, and that their vote might be the one that matters above all else. But in reality, America’s voting system is old and flawed in many ways. Electoral College is a commonly used term on the topic of elections but few people actually know how it works.
With any decision, both parties (republican and democratic) campaign over the state to gain support from voters to increase their chances of being elected to the office that they desire. When voting most voters arrive at polling stations to vote, first for instance, they can be given a paper ballot on which they will select their choices and which later will be checked by hand; second they can be given a paper ballot on which they will select their choices with the assistance of a voting machine; or thirdly they can be given a sheet of paper with a numerical access code. Texans share a lot of the same essential needs of voting and nonvoting as other Americans. The republican party remains undefeated after a decade that saw fights over legislature redistricting, bitter and commonly intense campaigning around both inside and between the parties, continuously expensive battling up and down the ballot. In 2002, Republican competitors cleared all statewide races and took control of both houses of the Texas legislature, viably assuming the organizations of powers. The resulting year the legislative gathering returned to the distribution of districts for the U.S. House of Representatives the accomplishment of that offensive is seen inside the progressive changes in the delegations that are represented in the features of The Texas Delegation to the united states House of Representatives.
myth. Votes in an election should not be cast for a party but for the
...gister to vote. The ability to vote is having the ability to make a difference in the country and having a voice.
The single-member district election system is the most common and best-known electoral system currently in use in America. It is used to elect the U.S. House Representatives, as well as many state and local legislatures. Under single member district systems, an area is divided into a number of geographically defined voting districts, each represented by a single elected official. Voters can only vote for their district’s representative, with the individual receiving the most votes winning election. This method of electing representatives is better than any alternative solution in various ways. Four compelling reasons to support the single-member district election system include the fact that single-member districts give each voter a single, easily identifiable district member; the way single-member district voting helps protect against overreaching party influence; that single-member districts ensure geographic representation; and finally, that single-member districts are the best way to maximize representatives’ accountability.
...eople not voting! Americans are becoming less educated on the issues that they are facing as well as the candidates running at the time of office. However, according Longley (2011) ”Still, 93 percent of infrequent voters agreed that voting is an important part of being a good citizen and 81 percent of nonvoters agreed it is an important way to voice their opinions on issues that affect their families and communities” (pg. 1).
In America, political candidates go against one another in a process known as an election in which citizens vote for the next person who "best" fits the position. In addition, there are various amounts of debates on whether a citizen should be compelled to vote. Although some argue if citizens should be required by law to vote, there are exceeding an amount of disadvantages.
The right to vote gives citizens the chance to participate in government, meaning that all citizens, who are 18 or older, can help decide who will be elected to a certain position of government. For example they can help decide who the state legislators, the governor, the lieutenant governor, and even judges will be. As a voting public citizens can also choose county and city officials, some of these include county commissioners, county judges, mayors, and city council members. Voters can also help make decisions about important key issues that are affecting their lives. Citizens vote on also vote on local laws and at the state level, citizens can even vote on amendments to the constitution.
from voting, but are used by creating new laws that would prevent one’s ballot to be
After the person has entered their name into the election, they must start to campaign. There are m...