Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Short note on political ideology
Political Ideologies
Political ideology introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Short note on political ideology
Voting is an expression of who people believe they are. Political ideologies are related to our values and we use politics as a way to share our values. Voting symbolizes our connection to a larger societal group. Studies also point to the idea that voting becomes a habit. Social pressure is a major influence on people's voting decisions; many people vote a particular way to fit in with a group. Social pressure that influences our political decisions may come from spouses, friends, parents, or religious leaders. The physical attractiveness of candidates is very important to their popularity. Other influencing factors look for are candidates they feels are confident, optimistic, trustworthy, experienced, friendly, emotionally sensitive but strong, and assert a plan of action. People's voting is also influenced by well known public figures like actors they view as intelligent and credible. Highly covered news events like Rep. Gabrielle Gifford and school shootings elicit public emotions and draw attention to certain issues like gun regulation and candidates who support it. People are inclined to vote for candidates they believe will best protect the country, their freedoms and ideals. Saddam Hussein being captured in 2003 boosted public opinion and support for George W. Bush in the 2004 election; Hurricane Katrina had the opposite effect. Positive or negative media coverage plays a big roll in how people view events and politicians.
There are many factor that people consider when casting their vote on a ballot. Household income is one important voting influence, income is in turn influenced by other factors such as a person's profession, the job market, and political economic policies. If people feel the rich are not paying enou...
... middle of paper ...
...t is ever brought to a vote. Her study shows that political contributions carry more weight in the states with higher paid legislators. Money also has greater influence in states where the advantage of the majority party could be lost in either a close race or because an incumbent has aspiration of running for higher office. Campaign donations carry less power in states that have more educated voters and term limits; it can predict how much time legislators spend on personal and party fundraising. The need for more fundraising means interests groups spend more time with legislators, and it logically follows that they are more likely to listen and be swayed by the concerns of the interests groups. Thus the more evenly divided the electorate between parties in a state or county, like swing states, the more influence money has on politicians, bills, and public policy.
in lobbying policy makers, the role of business in financing elections, and messages favorable to
The United States national elections have been experiencing a steady decline of eligible voters showing up to vote. This steady decline has been ongoing since experiencing a significant increase in voter turnout from 1948 through 1960. Over the years there has been significant, meticulous research done to try to pinpoint the cause of the decline in voter turnout over years. All of this research has led to the production of an enormous number of literatures written on the perceived causes. The vast amount of literature produced has led to a number of competing explanations about this decline. The quest for the answer to the question of, why this decline in voter turnout, is very important for an overwhelming majority of Americans and our democratic system because the people/voters can only truly be represented by our government if all eligible voters go out and vote. For this paper I will examine four theories that attempt to explain the decline. The four theories that I will discuss are voting barriers, campaign contributions, negative campaign advertising, and finally the cultural explanation. However, through thorough exploration and critiques of the strengths and weaknesses of these four theories, we will find that the cultural explanation theory is currently the most persuasive theory in the group. Finally, I will also explore some reasons as to why citizens do vote as well.
Among the many ways Americans can participate in politics, voting is considered one of the most common and important ways for Americans to get involved. The outcome of any election, especially at the national level, determines who will be making and enforcing the laws that all Americans must abide by. With this in mind one might assume that all Americans are active voters, but studies show the voter turnout is actually astonishingly low. With this unsettling trend it is important to know what statistics say about voter turnout as was as the four major factors that influence participation: Socioeconomic status, education, political environment, and state electoral laws, in order to help boost turnout in future elections.
Hypothesis #2: Money, big corporations, and fellow party affiliates affect the voting patterns of Senators and House members.
"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives. A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy or perhaps both." -- James Madison ("Focus" 1)
When it comes to voting there are some major issues of concerns of whom the voters choose to votes for. Some of these issues consist of party affiliation, group interests, the candidate themselves, the economy and policy issues. In the election
In a Democratic economy, people elect their representatives through the system of voting. The choice of electing a strong government is always there in people’s hands. As much as casting the vote to a righteous government is important, it’s equally or more important that it is done right. The decision of forming the ruling government is based on the vote count and there is a high risk of voter fraud to take place during elections. Casting vote on others behalf or rigging to increase the vote share of the favorable candidate leads to a complete failure of democracy. Presenting a valid ID at the time of voting will eliminate voter fraud to a great extent and helps to maintain credibility in the decision made.
Along with Obama, Vogel mentions Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid as critics of large donors, who then also were leading in super PAC fundraisers. Though Vogel mentions many people and events, he never goes into great detail about any of it. Even with the immense amount of information that is left to the reader to decipher and research, one must ask themselves this question, “what are the effects of big money on modern politics.”
Many people argue that the legislative branch is run by few big interest groups because of their massive contributions against very small contributions from individuals. In a democratic society, power must be shared equally among its citizens, but is that the case in the United States? The answer is simply no, and by limiting their overall spending on elections, policymakers will listen and pay more attention to the public interest over the special interest. Also, by revealing the freeloaders’ names, people will have more knowledge of who is representing them and who has tended to benefit those who made contributions to their campaigns. Finally, prohibiting the spending on food, entertainment and gifts to legislative branch employee will also reduce the corruption in the legislative
Since the establishment of our great country, Americans utilized the ballot box as a freedom of expression. Voting is a basic right that many of us take for granted, some even viewing it as a “God given right.” As citizens, we expect the right to vote. Many oblivious to the fact that voting is a privilege that can be revoked. The process, commonly referred to as disenfranchisement, is the principle reason for my summary. Today more than ever, one of America's post-election concerns is voter turnout. Usually, the numbers are bleak, especially during local elections. As a society, we cannot afford to turn our back on one of the pillars of a democracy. If elected officials are to represent segments of voters, then people from all lifestyles need to be able to participate in the process. As a Republic, our elected officials carry the message of their constituents, uniting many voices into one. This is not the case for some segments of society. Major findings show that over an estimated 5.2 million Americans have lost the right to vote. (Lance 2008) Many of these Americans are members of minority groups. The process that makes disenfranchisement possible has been in practice for centuries. The law states that once you have become a felon you lose your right to vote. This applies even after their release into society. Further aggravating the issue is society’s current tough stance on lawbreakers, which has converted what were once misdemeanors into felonies. The result has been record amounts of prison inmates across the United States, resulting in millions of Americans who hold no voice in their future. The argument made is that these men and women have been reduced to living in the shadows of society. On the other si...
I believe that the single most important societal problem currently is voting right restrictions. November is quickly coming upon us, so does the right to cast our votes for whoever we believe to be the best candidate for the oval office. However, new voting right restrictions will make the voting process harder for certain groups. These laws will affect of upwards to millions of potential voters this coming election. We all have the right to vote. The government also has the right for certain groups to make that ballet harder to cast. The reason that voting right restriction is so important is because it stops numerous people from voting, a specific group of people were targeted, and the reason the law was made is wrong.
Today in America, less than half of young voters between the ages of 18 and 24 vote (TheBestColleges.org). What most of these new adults fail to realize, is that their government depends on them to vote and elect new leaders to represent their country. Many of them make excuses to avoid voting, when really, they benefit most from voting.
What We Don’t Know About Campaign Finance Does Hurt Us. “No matter what your social issue, if you want to solve it get the money out of politics. Only then will lawmakers vote for their people rather than their pocketbooks.” Jack E. Lohman. Money corrupts politics, and when contributions are being made to candidates it is not in the best interest of the American people. Campaign Finance is out of control in today’s political races. Candidates are taking money from wherever and whoever they can get it. Soft money is flowing through elections without care or caution. People who make these contributions do not share the views of the average citizen, so politicians end up representing the wrong people. Money decides races, sometimes leaving the better man but lighter spender out of a position. Candidates make decisions based on what will help them financially that what is better for the people. Contributions by industry are made not in the interest of the people, sometimes hurting them in ways they don’t even know. No matter what the opposition may say campaign finance reform is needed urgently to keep our democracy as our founders intended it. People and corporations that make the largest donations to campaigns do not share views with the general population. Politicians will listen to those who give them money so that they can depend on that money being there again when it is time for reelection. Yet individual donors making a $200 dollar or more contribution make up only .33% of the population. This extremely small percentage of mostly wealthy individuals gain the power to influence politicians to their liking. The idea that these people should have power to affect government more than those with less money goes against the concept of equality for all, which is what made this country great. People who make large donations do not share the same views on most issues as the general population. Robert L. Borosage and Ruy Teixeira report that while 53 percent of voters want stricter regulations on businesses and corporations, to give workers a fair salary and working conditions, 58 percent of campaign donors want to see less control over the businesses and corporations of America. Donors also want less government spending with lower taxes, while the majority of citizens want a larger, more powerful government. A very tiny part of our populat...
Such factors are their educational background, socioeconomic status, gender and other demographics. There will be a definite difference between a person who has an excellent academic background and a person who does not have such qualification. In the same way, socioeconomic status of a person also decides how well a person engages politically (Riedel and Sullivan, 2001). For instance, an individual who comes from a very lower class will not pay heed to political system of the country because his basic concern is to feed his children and family. His priorities will be different from a person who has all basic necessities. In the same way a middle aged person who has an adequate knowledge and experience regarding the political system of a country and a young person who is just an amateur will have significant differences of political attitudes and political efficacy. So attitudes and experiences also affect the political efficacy and ultimately the voting behaviors of the individuals (Sheerin and Celia Anne, 2007). Mass Media is one of the tools to build these attitudes and political
The American Political System The American political system is a federal system, which consists of