Vocal Communication Case Study

Do humans really know how useful non-verbal communication can be? Can humans find news ways to help better understand our messages to one another? Well, throughout time, vocal communication has been a huge benefit to humans as they can interact with an other in life. Although, most humans today have a hard time understanding more than the verbal itself, it’s about the non-verbal part they’re mussing. Understating who acquired the vocal communication, doing experiments, and think about our future, we can better understand on how to communicate with each other by helping at each other in the present. To start off with, the Neanderthals have a vocal tract that resembles a modern newborn infant which really doesn’t allow them to have full establishment

Lasting 15 minutes with only communicating with him by speech was any easy experiment. Since moving the body was limited in this experiment to describe the object with hands, it made my friend to do it himself and I had to say “yes” or “no.” If he was describing the object with his body correctly. Based on this experiment, it makes a person realize that have “signs” in our language can really benefit the other person as it can help convey what you’re talking about and help a person that can’t speak at all, understand your response to them. The only people that have a difficulty that can’t read body language is the blind, handicapped, and others that haven 't had people around their lives that have established body language when they talk to him/her. A adaptive benefit of reading body language would be that most deaf and mute people would understand others by giving them a body language response rather than ASL or writing it down. One way that body language won’t be a benefit in environmental conditions would be a scientist describing his colleague the contamination in the lake, rather than him taking his colleague to the lake. In the end, both experiments showed that it only takes another to help or adapt what the other is saying by comprehending what the other is trying to

The non-verbal people would most likely be acting strange when they hear the other group of humans talking to them. After that, the verbal humans would probably be non-verbal to try to help communicate with them. If they were both verbal, however, they spoke different languages. Both of them would most likely use non-verbal ways to comprehend one another. It’s almost like teamwork to help benefit the communication all around them. Human communication in the future may stay the same verbally, however with technology growing, I can see a new way that a device for the non verbal people to use to speak with the verbal like from their device. A speaking device, not a texting one. In the future, humans will still keep their original communication to adapt to their environments. There is no reason to change something that is not broken in our world. We can only learn from each other to help communicate with others that have a hard time doing