Violent Video Game Should be Banned

Good Essays
Violent video games should not be banned from the United States. Violent video games are not related to real-world violence. These games in fact can enhance reading and visual skills that can be used in the real world. Even if a state was to ban the sale of violent video games they would be going against the constitution. Also statistics show that while violent video game sales increase teen violence decreases. There should be no banning of violent video games anytime soon.

First of all video games can benefit the person playing the game. Video games strengthen reading and visual skills. In the article “what video games can teach us” by Emily Sohn, Sohn says “because kids are interested in the game, they often end up reading at a level well above their grade.” This statement is true about anything, a person will do things as long as they think it benefits them. In a kids case they believe that reading during the game will help them beat the game. Therefore they will read even though they may not realize that they are improving their literacy skills at the same time as playing the game.A game may improve your visual skills as well. A study made by researchers from the University of Rochester came to the conclusion that video game players gain better visual skills than people that don’t play them. Video game players can keep track of more objects at a time. As well as pick out objects quicker out of a cluttered environment.

If a state were to ban the sale of video games they would be going against the constitution. In the first amendment of the Constitution it says “congress shall make no law of …… or abridging the freedom of speech.” This says that a state cannot keep a seller from

selling a violent video game. A ban of vio...

... middle of paper ...

...does it (plays video games). It’s like blaming food because we have obesity. “ which is true. You can’t blame a

shooting just because someone plays video games. As a matter of fact in the Virginia Tech shooting the shooter did not play video games. Before anyone new that he didn’t they quickly assumed that he did. Just because it was a violent act and because everyone plays video games.

People believe that violent video games should be proscribed, but there are no reasons to ban them. First of all you are banning something that can strengthen reading and visual skills. By banning you also go against the constitution. There's also no proof that video games influence violent crimes. Statistically it is proven that while video game sales go up juvenile crime decreases. Violent video games should not be banned because they do not influence violent crimes.