Violating the Fourth Amendment Rights of Antoine Jones

778 Words4 Pages
In this case, I am presenting an individual citizens Fourth Amendment protection captivated from Jones and others individuals. The government started investigating Jones with a suspicions conspiracy of drug trafficking. A tracking device installed on the defendants’ vehicle after a terminated authorize a warrant permanent to the Government to search and install a GPA on Jones vehicle. Antoine Jones and others with the same conspiracy of the investigation were sentenced life imprisoned by the District Court Juries of Washington District of Columbia. The jury found Jones guilty of drug trafficking and possessions. The 12 amendments proposed in 1789, that constitutions the Bill of Rights under no circumstance to protections individualities citizens. In this case, United States vs. Jones provides the problematic statues of the Fourth Amendment protect “right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures” without a warrant remaining abated under the constitutions. CASE CONTEXT Federal bureau of investigation and other police departments of the District of Columbia targeted Jones for investigation by the Government after suspecting him for “narcotic” drug trafficking through the nightclub he owned in Washington D.C. The Government enforced to have a camera installed outside of his nightclub and wiretap his phone to track any kinds of information that could help them for the investigation. These sources used to gather enough information for the Government to support them on enforcing to getting the approval of warrants to installing tracking devices on to a registered vehicle of jones’s wife from the District Court. “A warrant issued, authorizing the installation of... ... middle of paper ... ...nlikely to fix innocent peoples sentence if made a slit mistake. Works Cited Noble, Andrea. "Defendant in Supreme Court GPS Case Pleads Guilty, Avoids Fourth Trial." Washington Times. The Washington Times, 01 May 2013. Web. 28 May 2014. "The Supreme Court Decides the GPS Case, United States v. Jones, and the Fourth Amendment Evolves: Part One in a Two-Part Series of Columns." Verdict. Web. 27 May 2014. "The Truth About Life Without Parole: Condemned to Die in Prison." ACLU of Northern California. Web. 28 May 2014. "UNITED STATES v. JONES." LII / Legal Information Institute. Web. 26 May 2014. "UNITED STATES v. JONES." United States v. Jones. Web. 26 May 2014. "U.S. v. Jones – Oral Arguments | JOLT Digest." JOLT Digest RSS. Web. 28 May 2014. "Warrant Needed for GPS Tracking, High Court Says." Washington Times. The Washington Times, 23 Jan. 2012. Web. 28 May 2014.

More about Violating the Fourth Amendment Rights of Antoine Jones

Open Document