Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
imporance of physical evidence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: imporance of physical evidence
On January 10, 2017, at approximately 0153 hours, the defendant, Victor Manuel Cruz-Anaya, while at 1030 Ribaut Road Lot 6, Beaufort, South Carolina 29902, which is located within the jurisdiction of the City of Beaufort, did cause bodily injury upon the body of Sofia Chavez. The defendant commit this offense by placing his hands around the victim neck, choking her and by grabbing her wrist tightly restraining her from moving at her free will, during an argument. This action caused Chavez to fear for her safety. This altercation took place in the presence of a minor, 3 years of age. Affiant and others are witness to prove the same.
(3 points) What kind of defenses has the defendant raised? Or, if the case is over, what defenses did the defendant raise? If not clear in the article, what are the likely defenses?
It is their job to prove the burden of proof by linking the disturbing crime to the defendant. In this case, the prosecution’s defense had succeeded in providing evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden of proof was delivered by highlighting the defendant’s motive which could be used to determine the intent behind the criminal act. In addition, the defendant’s erratic behavior that raised suspicion could also be used to prove the burden of proof. The fact that the defendant indicated that his wife was deceased, while she still was alive, can demonstrate that the murder was planned. Moreover, the defendant’s strategic travel to San Diego after Laci’s Peterson body and fetus were discovered and the change in the defendant’s physical appearance can be used to allude the proof of the defendant’s consciousness of guilt. Also, the items removed from the defendant’s car during the traffic stop, specifically the thousands of dollars in cash, can indicate that the defendant planned to flee the country at some point during his trip to San Diego. Lastly, the chain of events that took place during the period of the victim’s disappearance and the discovery of her body, and the defendant’s secret lover becoming a key witness was used to strengthen the circumstantial evidence. All in all, despite the lack of concrete evidence, the prosecution team was able to provide facts that illustrated a timeline of events that could fill in the gaps of the
I arrived on scene at 17:10 hours. A juvenile was standing under the carport beside a white Dodge Durango. The reporting party, Kaella D. Barners (F/B, DOB: 05/04/1977), exited the front door when she seen deputies arrive. I approached the juvenile, Katera Edwina Barners (F/B, DOB: 08/29/2000). Katera was calm and cooperative. Katera had been upset at her mother. I observed an end table on the hood of the vehicle. I asked Katera if she put it there. Katera said she threw it there in attempt to damage the vehicle.
The Police report that there were several calls reporting of the parents were using drugs, and not feeding little Kayleigh, although the police also indicated that the house were safe environment for the child and there was no indication of abusing, the police did not connect child welfare because of no evidence of any kind. The mother and the boyfriend are being charge of felony “assault on a child, causing death to the little baby girl and both admitted of killing the little baby girl, both of the charge are includes special circumstances while the prosecutors await on a piece of information before convicting the mother and the boyfriend. The new also indicated that both of them are being held 25 years to life in prison if they are found convicted.
On October 31, 2016 the complainant walked into the Fifth District police station and reported that on October 28, 2016, Tavante Robinson hereinafter referred to as the respondent had sent threatening texts to another teacher at the school. One of the text messages read “Don’t think it’s over u wanna be in this to say nm idgaf I got you Ms. tabias Ms. Hayward all yall mfs don’t think its sweet I left my mother ima be waiting for her to step foot out that mfn building ima get yall one by one.” The message was then followed by the defendant sending pictures of several guns and in one of the pictures he was holding a gun with an extended magazine. The respondent then sent another text messages stating “Tell Ms. Ashford to look into finding some new teachers staff period.” The complainant is afraid for her safety and believes that the respondent can carry out the threat. The respondent has mental issues and believes he has access to weapons. The complainant was provided these text messages a day later after the incident occurred.
McAlister case valid rules of evidence and testimony were used to prove Jose McAlister is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In this case, circumstantial evidence demonstrated a factual matter by proving other events from which the occurrence of the matter can be reasonably inferred. The evidence of the map found in McAlister’s car proved there was a relationship between McAlister and the murder of the victim Venzie Viktum. Furthermore, the evidence received by law enforcement was relevant, reliable, and competent. The evidence was gathered by a probable cause and was not prejudicial, misleading, inaccurate or distracting. The court case had many valid testimony’s that prove Jose is guilty of the charges against him. The prosecutions’ witness Willy will testify at the preliminary hearing and admitted he was in a drug distribution conspiracy with Jose. Additionaly the prosecutions discovery would be available and applicable to be called by the intern at the government laboratory that conducted the certificate of analysis analyzing the evidence found and the body. The prosecution has plans to call Jose’s former attorney that knows everything about Jose’s illegal activities. Futheremore the prosecution will also call Nancy Nozzy who is the neighborhood watch caption that information. The expert testimony from the government laboratory has specialized knowledge that will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence that Jose was guilty. The testimonies from
Martinez went to trial in Eddy County Fifth Judicial District Court. During trial, it was revealed that one of the car present at the murder scene belonged to Martinez’s defense attorney Michael Carrasco. Not only that, the “white car” that left the crime scene was also owned by the defense counsel’s law firm. In effect, there was an apparent conflict of interest due to the defense counsel’s relationship to the
What are the basic facts of the case? The facts of the case are On February 9, 1978, a preteen girl by the name of Kimberly Leach, age 12, was believed to have been nowhere to be found in this girl’s high school which was located in Lake City, Florida, the Leach girl's to a certain degree disintegrated embodiment was found in the woodsy locality by the Suwanee River, in Suwanee County, Florida, later about two months after finding the body of the young girl, an area and county search was conducted into finding who the criminal was (FSU, Law, 2014).
She advised that Lisa became argumentative and stated "you're so ugly, how you let your kids kiss you.” Marion advised that Lisa then threw a VHS tape at her which barely missed her face. Lisa then picked up another tape and began to swing it in the direction of her. Marion stated in defense, she put up her hands and attempted to block from being hit. Marion advised she then shoved her which made her fall to the ground. After Lisa got up from the ground, they both went their separate ways and called the police. Both the victim and accused were advised that I would create a report for Simple Assault and they could sign criminal charges anytime up to a
The case of the State of Florida vs. Chad Heins happened in 1994 in Mayport, Florida. It was on April 17, 1994 that Tina Heins, who was pregnant at the time, was found stabbed to death in her apartment. She shared an apartment with her husband Jeremy Heins and Jeremy’s brother Chad Heins. At the time of the incident Jeremy Heins was on a ship because he worked in the navy but Chad Heins was at the apartment. Before the incident happened Chad Heins, the defendant, who was nineteen at the time, used his brothers license to buy alcohol at a strip club near the apartment. After that Chad Heins had went to another bar where his brothers license got confiscated. He left the bar around 12:45 a.m. and went back to the apartment. He then washed his
Cesar Chavez was a civil rights leader who fought for farm workers to be respected and to not be treated like unimportant human beings (Fighting for.) Cesar Chavez did achieve his goal for farm workers after he started his movement. The goal was to be treated right. Cesar Chavez helped the farm workers through the UFW, the methods he used to fulfill his goals, and because of the many supporters he had,
Once Campbell was placed in my restraints, Deputy Juliano #5704, showed up and stood by I briefed Lt. Young via my department issued cell phone. Once he was briefed I advised him that the Deputy was not pursuing charges on Campbell for battery on a LEO, when he made contact with her in the County jurisdiction due to her mental state. I then advised Lt. Young that I was not going to pursue charges for Campbell pushing me due to her not being in a normal mental operating state during the incident.
On 04/14/18, at approximately 1:30pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian with Franklin County Animal Care and Control (FCACC) was dispatched to 235 N. 18th St on a nuisance dog investigation (dog owner's address). I arrived on scene at approximately 1:56pm. I met with victim Robert White. Mr. White stated he was walking in the alley behind 200 Block of Monroe Ave. A white male had a black dog approximately 6 feet away from him. As he continue to walked through the alley, the dog tried to attack him. Mr. White stated the dog was on a "retractable leash" but Mr. White noticed that the dog owner had extended the leash to the point that the dog was close enought to Mr. White. Mr. White stated he move to the opposite side of dog owner, and words
In the discussion of the Trials of Darryl Hunt, The Trials of Darryl Hunt is one of those stories you find yourself watching on the edge of your seat, thinking that this cannot be possibly true. I observed an documentary of the brutal rape and murder in the South by a wrongfully convicted man named Darryl Hunt, which spent twenty years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Hunt spent the next 20 years of his life trying to prove his innocence more than a decade of his struggle. The most interested aspect about the Darryl Hunt case is how the first trial featured an enormous amount of errors by the investigation and prosecution teams. I saw how that there was no physical evidence, a photo lineup was bungled, timelines didn’t match, and witnesses were very unreliable.
suddenly jumps in front of her and drags her into an alley. The attacker strikes (A) and rips her clothes. Fortunately, (A) hits the attacker with a rock and runs to safety. The man’s actions do not amount to assault, they amount to a battery as he dragged the woman to an alley, stroke her, and ripped her clothes off with the intent of causing her harm. The acts of the woman are a measure of self-defense, and she cannot be held accountable for the infliction she may have induced to the man. If the man just followed her without having any physical contact with her, his actions would have constituted to assault, as he would inflict fear into the