Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Features of activity based costing
Features of activity based costing
Features of activity based costing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Features of activity based costing
Veolia use of activity based costing will be important in their decisions on how they approach the regulations for reducing their Carbon Dioxide emissions or whether they will purchase credits. Their product is steam and electricity to the population of Philadelphia and the U of P in Philadelphia. Currently, the cost of buying CO2 credits from the last RGGI action was $5.41 per ton. The last action in March of 2015 sold 15, 272, 670 credits. Veolia will need to establish not only the engineering, construction and operating cost of each of the alternatives to reduction alternatives for CO2 over the purchasing of credits. The cost per ton will continue to increase per the RGGI rules. Currently, Veolia has not participated in the RGGI actions for credits for the Pennsylvania is not a member. If Pennsylvania becomes a member this will be an option for Veolia to meet their compliance of …show more content…
The purchase of credits is a short term option for all companies producing electricity and steam regardless of the type of fossil fuel used. Present research has concentrated their evaluations on coal since coal produces the highest emissions of CO2. The following is the emissions of CO2 per Btu of energy based on fuel type is : Coal (anthracite) 228.6, Coal (bituminous) 205.7, Coal (lignite) 215.4, Coal (subbituminous) 214.3, Diesel fuel & heating oil161.3, Gasoline157.2, Propane139.0, and Natural gas117.0. Since natural gas is principally methane, it has higher energy thus lower CO2 compared to other fuels. This lower generation of CO2 has limited the interest in research to reduce the CO2 that is in the stack exhaust. However, the cost of engineering, construction, and operating any of the options
The issue presented in this paper is how one can aim to reduce the amounts released, and what the best ways to solve this problem are. This has been long debated amongst scientists, businessmen, Industry-owners, and politicians amongst many other eminent figures in society. The four major approaches to reducing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere include: subsidies of alternative energy, cap and trade, carbon taxes, and command and control regulation. We will examine and compare the effectiveness of two of these methods: The carb...
The tradeoffs of using gasoline for cars are large emission of carbon dioxide and required large amount of chemical t...
In this case, there are two solutions presented to reduce carbon emissions in the air from burning fossil fuels; as a result, it will reduce global warming. In this paper, these solutions and questions related to them are to be discussed and analyzed.
In an era of rising technology and increasing population, demands on the environment are continually being pushed to new levels. As a result, it becomes important for us to expand our knowledge about the environment and take appropriate actions to protect this element of most importance to human existence. One component of our environment experiencing some of the greatest abuse due to humans is the air. Air pollution has been on the rise ever since the beginning of industrialization. The climbing number of factories and use of cars worldwide are the major culprits of this environmental hazard. There are various gases released into the air that can be considered air pollutants, but one of the most prevalent and dangerous to the environment is carbon dioxide (CO2). Up to 95% of the CO2 produced is the result of natural processes (Burnett & Matthews Jr., 1998). The rest is a direct result of human activity, primarily through the burning of fossil fuels in the production of energy
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a key global warming gas that is proposed to have direct linkage to global climate changes [1, 2]. Therefore, there is a growing interest in developing technologies for efficient capture and sequestration of large quantities of CO2. An efficient and economical capture material is needed to capture and separate the CO2 produced during various industrial processes. There are four potential sources of carbon dioxide emission; industrial processes, fossil fueled power plants, de-carbonization (production of hydrogen from carbon rich feed stock), and transportation [3]. Among the carbon dioxide emission sources, fossil fueled power plants are ranked the number one potential source. Fossil fuels provide 81 percent of the world’s commercial energy supply [4]. Consumption of fossil fuels produces nearly 30 Pg (petagram) of carbon dioxide annually. About three-fourths of the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide is attributed to burning of fossil fuels [5].
Many negative impacts have resulted from global warming, but many positive changes have been made by humanity. There have been many ideas on what humans can do to improve on the green house gases and CO2 emissions we create and where it can lead us to. For example, reducing CO2 emissions have been giving many thoughts of what could cause the upraising of green house gases. One of the main sources is automobile emissions. The makers of Shell Gasoline Corporation, a Fortu...
Weltman, Barbara. "Tax Incentives for Going Green." NY Report. N.p., 3 Feb. 2010. Web. 06 Feb. 2014.
Power plants light up the world that we live in today, and without them the luxury of electricity would not be possible. However, power plants also cause considerable damage to the environment that unfortunately may be irreversible. To fight this, the government has set laws in place, such as the Clean Air Act (CAA, n.d.), to help dramatically reduce the risk of devastating environmental harm as much as possible. This regulates hazardous carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions released into the Earth’s atmosphere (EPA, 2017). Carbon capture technologies assist in fulfilling the legal requirements of the Clean Air Act. By the use of three different methods, oxy-fuel combustion, post-combustion capture, and pre-combustion capture, power plants can
The development of science and technology has led to people considering using alternative fuels to generate electricity. There are many alternative fuels that can generate electricity, such as natural gas, nuclear energy, wind energy, hydraulic power and so on (Fossil Fuels Used to Generate Electricity Power Plant Emissions of North America). According to the statistics by the U.S. Energy Information Administration in 2009, the usage of coal was still the largest source to generate the power. Sources of electricity in the United States were generated by 44.9% of coal, 20.3% of nuclear, 23.4% of natural gas, 1% of petroleum, 6.9% of hydroelectric conventional and 3.6% of others (Electric Power Monthly with Data for February 2014). Coal is the main source of electricity in many parts of the world, including the United States. One of the reason why most countries prefer to use coal to generate the electricity is that the cost of using coal is cheaper than other sources but powerful. The coal power stations are much easier to set up than other power station. There are many advantages in generating power from coal. Coal as a source of electricity is economic, safe, effective and it is easy to eliminate the secondary pollutions and so on. As a result, the usage of coal should remain its status and cannot be replaced by other fuels.
The globalization of coal may be the top reason for climate change, especially in China. Particularly, burning coal is the biggest source greenhouse emissions. “China is currently building over 1 gigawatt of new coal plants every week.” 1 This is dangerous since those producing the coal, only use the energy and leave the carbon dioxide behind; dumping it into the atmosphere and increasing the greenhouse effect. As a result, the rise in temperature may
This paper was designed to look more in detail at the power industry and the environment. The topics in this paper include: coal and its impact on the environment, natural gas and its impact on the environment, and basic economics. Specifically, this paper seeks answers to the following questions:
Coal accounts for most U.S. SO2 emissions and a large portion of NOx emissions. Sulfur is present in coal as an impurity, and it reacts with air when the coal is burned to form SO2. In contrast, NOx is formed when any fossil fuel is burned. There are several options for reducing SO2 emissions, including using coal containing less sulfur, washing the coal, and using devices called “scrubbers” to chemically remove the SO2 from the gases leaving the smokestack. Power plants can also switch fuels. Similar to scrubbers on power plants, catalytic converters reduce NOx emissions from cars. There are other sources of electricity besides fossil
The emission of green house gasses due to human activity contributes the most in increasing global warming. Today, fossil fuels are used as a source of energy for transportation, electricity, industrial process and to increase human comfort in this era. Over the last decade humans have created mass amount of industries. These industries have been burning fossil fuels such as coal, which release carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide; carbon dioxide absorbs heat that raises the temperature of the earth. More than 80% of carbon dioxide comes from tr...
Energy crisis and environmental pollution are highlighted to be one of the major global problems in the 21st century. For the past 200 years, human society has had a ravenous appetite for fossil fuels. The huge increase in human population and also the industrial revolution were the major sources of fossil fuel consumption. However it is becoming obvious that our dependence on fossil fuels is causing many problems that we are going to have to address. Therefore, our greatest challenge is to find means to reduce the extraction and combustion of fossil fuels. Fortunately, we have the potential to reduce the CO2 emission from fossil fuels combustion by converting them into renewable, carbon-neutral energy sources that provide the energy services now obtained from fossil fuels (1–3).
Fossil fuel emissions are the main cause of global warming. We release over twenty billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year, which increases the amount of heat trapped by the greenhouse effect, thereby contributing to global warming. The amount of fossil fuel remaining is limited. This will cause job losses in the fossil fuel industry. On the other hand, the United States has advanced technologies such as solar panels that can replace fossil fuel, which will cause the amount of green jo...