There should be dress codes for public schools for three main reasons: it will make a better school, it will save families money, and teens will stop trying to impress their peers with what they wear and focus more on school because everyone will look similar. Saves Families Money Dress code saves families money and time. This is because students won’t be pressured to ask their parents for money or to buy the clothes (Dress Code). For instance if you wanted to buy your children new outfits every time they wanted them and they were also all name brand those outfits could come to be around 250 dollars for 2 shirts, two pair of pants , a sweater and a vest or something around that area. Yeah, they will last alot longer than 10 dollar shirts and 20 dollar pants but look at the money you save.
Many kids in America suffer from type 2 diabetes and obesity. Schools do not inform children enough on what they should know about to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Schools should give information about having a healthy lifestyle by what they offer kids for breakfast and lunch, offering health classes to children at young ages, and limiting the amount of unneeded material students are exposed to at school. Schools should educate children about what they consume from what they offer children for breakfast and lunch. “With many schools districts facing budget shortfalls, a quick solution has come from offering more profitable fast food” (Barboza 17).
Packing a school lunch every day can be a hassle for parents. They have to go out and purchase the materials to make the food. Then, they have to pack the lunch. Now, this may not seem like much to some, but the ten minutes it takes to make and pack a lunch could be spent on many other things for a busy family. In a poll given to fourteen Saint James students, 92% of students said that their parents would most likely buy the healthier school options over packing a lunch/buying the old school lunches.
Schools should provide healthy meals, and encourage the students to take part in the school’s lunch program. By providing students with unappealing and unhealthy meals, the students will not be at the top of their game for the day. This could affect their education and future in the long run. According to Jane L. David in “What Research Says About School Meals and Learning”, there have been changes in the students who face malnutrition, ever since schools began a breakfast program. Students with malnutrition or at nutritional risk, have a behavior that stands out comparing the data to regular students.
The unthinkable: eating a school lunch. Simply entering the school cafeteria is daring enough, but now having to eat the food? How outrageous this seems. The student has given the secretary their lunch number and next has picked out a clean tray. Along with this, a choice of milk of has been selected and then the mound of slump has been placed on their tray.
Rather than using the money to get students new technology or property it 's wasted on a lunch program that students do not enjoy nor want to purchase. In the Article, “School Lunch Food is Not Fresh, Students Say” Journalist Audrey Levine interviews high school students about they feel about their school lunches. “It’s way too expensive now, but I’m still buying,” said senior Stephanie Huang. “And I don’t think more people are bringing lunch because
Childhood obesity is on the rise, so understanding the directive behind government’s smaller portions is not difficult to recognize. Since not all of our nation’s children are obese, therefore, each child has different nutritional needs. Some children burn more than the limited calorie guidelines, so they may still be hungry after lunch. When children are hungry, they may choose to eat items that they find at the convenience store after school; namely junk food. The Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act is just an act.
School Lunches are Preposterous Schools worldwide try to make changes for the better when it comes to the nutritional values of things served at school lunches, or do they? In 2010, Michelle Obama came in to better the school lunches by increasing its nutritional value. Many parents below the middle class line get help from the government to pay for their child’s lunch. Even middle class are having a difficult time paying for lunches. Many students are even coming home hungry because what was being served at school isn’t worth the little money some of them have.
Some kids rather starve now days instead of eating cafeteria food at school and that is not good. With kids spending most of their time in school anyways, they need a healthy and decent tasting lunch to keep them
For example, some schools prohibit junk food in vending machines, snack bars, and concession stands. According to American Journal of Public Health, “Soda is widely considered to be a contributor to the increase in obesity because it has been associated with excess energy intake and weight gain in several cross-sectional and prospective cohort studies.” In other words, junk food leads to laziness and weight gain if contributed on a daily basis. Having junk food in schools could become very costly for students by buying junk food every day for lunch. Students can always bring a healthy lunch from home. Schools around the world have different opinions toward junk food, to either provide it in schools or not.