More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on breaching patient confidentiality
Introduction to ethics and healthcare
Being ethical and legal in healthcare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on breaching patient confidentiality
Kyle,
There are a lot of doctors out there who have a lot of patients and feel like they are under so pressure. However, in the case presented to us, I felt that the doctor put Valerie’s self-care on the line. The reason I believe this is because the doctor was almost complaining that she had too many emails and could not keep with every individuals information. I think that this was a violation because the doctor did not take the time to properly care for her patient who was in need. Valerie was also looking for comfort during this difficult time and was not given any sort of respect. Her confidentiality was most certainty violated. It was hard to know what age she was so I predicted either a teenage or a young adult. So, with, no matter
Not all cases is patient autonomy the most important thing to respect and honor. There will always be situations where Medical paternalism is justified. Justifiable paternalism in a medical perspective is prolonging patients’ lives allowing them to exercise their autonomy. Failing to respect a patient’s treatment requests or denials is a violation of the autonomy at that point in time during their illness. While the previous statement is true, the medical professional is violating a patient’s future autonomy. For this reason, medical professionals have the right to act paternalistically, therefore medical paternalism is justified by means of future autonomy and obligations to promote patient
Learning from what Dr. Anna Pou had to face with the lawsuits she was dealing with makes me cringe. As Healthcare professionals, having to worry of possibly being sued for believing what is right for the patient or as a whole for the hospitals health is ridiculous. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Often time’s society look at courts cases as a battle versus two oppositions, but Dr. Pou’s case it is not. In her statements from national television she states saying her role was to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’.
For anyone who has ever worked in healthcare, or simply for someone who has watched a popular hit television show such as Grey’s Anatomy, General Hospital, House or ER know that there can be times when a doctor or health care provider is placed in extremely difficult situations. Often times, those situations are something that we watch from the sidelines and hope for the best in the patient’s interest. However, what happens when you place yourself inside the doctors, nurses, or any other of the medical provider’s shoes? What if you were placed in charge of a patient who had an ethically challenging situation? What you would you do then? That is precisely what Lisa Belkin accomplishes in her book “First Do No Harm”. Belkin takes the reader on
At first, I believed that a patient should have the say so and get what they demand. I didn’t feel sympathetic for the health care provider one bit. I was able to look through the eyes of a physician and see the trials that they have to go through. It is not easy making the decisions that they have to make. There job is based on decisions, and most of it is the patient’s. “There will certainly be times when I will be faced with a request from a patient or patient’s representative that I will personally find morally difficult, but one that is still legally and ethically acceptable. must be very difficult to work in an area with little control over what you want to do.” (Bradley 1). Even though I do not fully understand a health care providers everyday role, I do know that they are faced with painful options. I personally feel that I can not work in this field for that exact reason. Health care providers play an extremely important role in our society, and others need to look upon
Providers must act in the best interest of the patient and their basic obligation is to do no harm and work for the public’s wellbeing. A physician shall always keep in mind the obligation of preserving human life. Providers must communicate full, accurate and unbiased information so patients can make informed decisions about their health care. As a result of their recommendations, providers are responsible for generating costs in health care but do not generate the need for those expenses. Every hospital has both an ethical as well as a legal responsibility to provide care, even if the care may be uncompensated.
...ort her actions, then Jack must do so as he is too responsible for making this situation known to the appropriate people. However, one must acknowledge how difficult this may be for Jack due to the long-standing relationship he has with Linda. It should also be apparent now that Linda’s actions are unjustifiable. She is not only acting unprofessionally and unethically by not delivering the medication but she is committing an illegal offence by falsifying records and stealing from the ward. To conclude, it is important to remember that the Department of Health and Children (2008) acknowledge that healthcare has originated in a world which is not flawless and that as humans, errors are possible. However, members of the healthcare system must try and prevent these errors from occurring where possible to ensure a high standard of care which is owed to the service users.
Normally it becomes difficult for medical records to be completely sealed up. The greatest factor that affects confidentiality is when clinicians turn to share medical information as case studies. In any case such data happens to be published in professional journals, then the patient’s identity is never divulged and the entire data that identifies the patient become either eliminated or changed. However, if at all the confidentiality is breached, the patient may have the right of suing, British Medical Association (2008).
Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives’ (2015) which states that obtaining patient’s informed consent is an act in their best interest and that nurses and midwives are required to respect individual’s right to accept or refuse treatment, moreover, support and document their decision, give evidence-based information, use clear language, cooperate with patients to help them with making the decision and be aware of the current legislations. This includes ‘Mental Capacity Act 2005’, ‘Mental Health Act 1983‘and ‘Human Rights Act 1998’. From a healthcare perspective vital articles are those which set out the rules for accessing patient’s capacity to make a decision, clarify who makes decisions for those who lack capacity and how this should be done, likewise those that regulate how to treat and protect patients without their consent but also those that specify basic human rights: to life, privacy, receiving information and other such as right to be free from discrimination or inhuman, degrading treatment. Other regulations to consider are ‘Human Tissue Act 2004’, ‘Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990’ (GMC, 2015). Professionals should also consider common criminal
We have all been in situations where we just could not conquer! This situation here not only has a financial issue but they are stuck in a costly situation. Heinz and his wife are in special need of a medical cure they cannot afford. Heinz himself has tried to find every resource available to help his wife but none has worked out in his favor. He has tried everything he could, and asked everyone whom he thought could help him; the druggist himself still is not letting up with the price he has given Mr. Heinz. With the druggist being the only dependable source right now, you would think he would want to help this cancer patient and save her life but that is not the case. The druggists feel as though since he created the cure, and paid for the
I respected my patient’s rights through confidentiality. I had a primigravida mother who had a group of family members awaiting for her infants arrival. There had been some slight complications with the delivery and when the infant was born it had to be taking to the NICU. I know I could only disclose information to the patient’s mother and not the other family
What are the limits imposed on patient confidentiality by the legitimate interests of third parties?
Since the beginning of medicine, physicians have taken an oath to uphold specific ethical standards regarding patient care. However, over time, this oath has become less of a promise and more of a formality. The thirst for knowledge and individual recognition for research has led to patients ultimately becoming an afterthought in the eyes of people entrusted to care for them most.
I feel that when dealing with patient communication confidentiality is the most important matter at hand. The patient has entrusted the doctor’s office to handle there help care with the utmost of care, professionalism and to keep their matters private. If a patient confidentiality was broken the entire office would be effected. Patients would no longer trust the doctor and his staff. When sending out any information you must always double check the patient name, email address/physical address, and fax number to make sure the information is being sent to the correct person.
Every patient that is admitted to hospital, or seen by a health professional has a right to his or her own privacy, and by ensuring professional boundaries are upheld this basic right can be achieved. According to Levett-Jones and Bourgeois (2011, pp. 237) confidentiality is an obligation made by a professional to respect the information given by a patient to healthcare professional. In today’s society through technology and social networks a patient’s privacy is far more vulnerable than it was in the past. By posting on Facebook anything about a patient or in discussion via internet or email to others a patient’s privacy has been breached and the trust created in a therapeutic relationship is no longer there causing what is known as a boundary crossing. Thompson (2010, pp.26) understands that “At times, boundary crossing may be unintentional”, but emphasizes that this behavior can lead to consequences. Pat...
Confidentiality is usually referred to as an ethical issue. The duty of confidentiality goes beyond undertaking not to divulge confidential information it also includes a huge responsibility of making sure that all written patient information is kept securely.