Vaccines Should Be Mandatory Essay

Your 50 year old child has polio, measles, and pertussis, all life threatening diseases. Why, because 40 years ago, you didn’t take him should be mandatory for children with access to vaccines to take them because negative reactions to vaccines are extremely rare, vaccines can save a child’s life, and the number of ingredients used in vaccines is safe for use on children.

Conflicting to what an exceeding number of parents believe, adverse reactions to vaccines are exceptionally rare. A very common side effect of vaccines is anaphylaxis, which is a serious life-threatening allergic reaction. But stuff like latex, certain medications, along with stings from bees etc. can also give you anaphylaxis. This means that the chance of you receiving anaphylaxis from items other than vaccines is much higher than being diagnosed because of vaccines. Also, the chance of you being hit by lightning is much

Vaccines aim to cure life-threatening diseases, and not taking them can put the children’s lives at huge risk. According to the American Academy Of Pediatrics, 90 to 99% of vaccines prevent diseases. Also, according to the world health organization, the number of measle related deaths have reduced by 79%, from 546,800 to 114,900. And ultimately, they also state that 17.1 million lives have been saved since 2000. When you add all these factors up, there is no reason you shouldn’t take vaccines, notably since the most critical ones/nearly all of them are free. For example, Stanford University states that childhood vaccinations save 42,000 deaths, 20 million cases of illnesses, 13.5 billion dollars in health care, and 68.8 billion dollars in societal costs annually. The problem is that those in countries with vaccines don’t need to take them, and those in countries without vaccines need them. Is there absolutely any reason why children shouldn’t take