Utterson: The Ideal Victorian Man In Mr. Hyde

1016 Words3 Pages

To give context to the discussion of unacceptable pleasures, the general idea of respectable man's traits should be was having self-control and discipline. Martin Danahy says that “the mark of a gentleman is control over his body and to lose his control is to lose one's class status and to sink from a “Dr.” to a “Mr.”.1 This change of class can be when Jekyll turns into a 'Mr.' to execute his pleasures and in Hyde's ape-like behaviour and uncontrolled his emotions. What this 'change' of class represents is the struggle to reform to the ideals of the Victorian gentleman. This ideal Victorian man can be found in Utterson who consciously made a decision not to let these desires affect him. Yet, if Utterson represents the ideal Victorian man, …show more content…

When examining the descriptions of Hyde by the characters in the novel, the similarity in all their description is the disgust felt for Hyde. Enfield mentions: “I had taken a loathing to my gentleman at first sight. So had the child's family... the doctor's case...he was like the rest of us; every time he looked at my prisoner, I saw that Sawbones turned sick and white with the desire to kill him.”7 Besides the question if people are unreliable in their descriptions ( like Enfield's ambiguous account which we be discussed later in detail) it is significant that Utterson, a character who does not seem to be involved in disreputable actions and is seen as a man who does judge people fast, does take a loathing to Hyde as well.8 On the other hand, Utterson might have already been influenced by Enfield's story; the fear that his dear friend Jekyll is being blackmailed by Hyde and his obsession with Hyde which is shown in Utterson's nightmare. Nevertheless, it is notable that Utterson, like the rest of the characters, share this dislike for …show more content…

One is something that Jekyll argues himself and links to the discussion of evilness. He explains Hyde's deformity as “Hyde, alone in the ranks of mankind, was pure evil” and that a person is a mixture of a dark side and a good side.9 Notwithstanding, the situation if more complicated it seems. Hyde is not necessarily completely evil but the disgust comes from him being open about who he is and what he wants. In other words, Hyde “makes public the face of masculine desire...”10 By Hyde enjoying certain acts openly leads to people being disgusted about this frankness (for instance, the disgust for Hyde in The Story of the Door comes after the witness of him trampling the child) or that other Victorian men's secrets, who are involved in similar acts, are endangered by Hyde's exposing of those acts. Perhaps, this is the deformity that people cannot place where it is. It is not something physical, but an attitude and contrasting character than what men are expected to have. Martin Donahy sees the deformity as a contradiction in Hyde himself as he betrays his true character and class that do not reflect his clothing or speech.11 While Donahy focuses on class, one can argue that this idea is more than just class difference, he acts differently from what is seen as

Open Document