Us Vs. Charles Thomas

777 Words2 Pages

Curricular Enhancement Project

Court Observation Outline

I. Introduction

II. Nature and Participants

United States of America vs. Charles "Chuck" Thomas

III. Testimony and Arguments defense

Main Argument of Defense

Family Issues

Plain Error

Violation of 6th Amendment

Blakely vs. Washington

Court's Response

V. What I Learned

I. Introduction

This was certainly not Charles Thomas's first time in a court room, several months before this he was being tired on a base offence level for money laundering with his partner Herbert Fletcher. Fletcher was tried in a different trial but was still called as a witness to this trial as a result of him pleading guilty and striking a deal with the court for his full cooperation. Through his cross examination we discovered that Thomas had wired money to several different banks throughout the states in order to hide the traces, and eventually wired a sum of 564,000 dollars into a bank account of his in the Bahamas. The Business that he was running was taking on several construction jobs when Thomas and his team stopped appearing at the sights. The damages that the Banding Company incurred from Thomas's actions was a sum of 6, 483,493. Thomas was tried with a total offence level of 28, witch equals 78-97 months in prison. This total included the adjustment for amount of funds being 600,000 to one million dollars, and an adjustment for Thomas role in the offense as an organizer and a leader. Thomas Challenged both upward adjustments claiming that the amount of funds should fall within a lower range, his defense was that the money spread throughout the banks in the US should not be included in the amount of money he laundered. He also claimed that he should no...

... middle of paper ...

...is experience, perhaps the most important being not waiting till the last minute to get something done. I have to leave myself enough time to allow for things when they don't go as planed.

In a different light I was able to deepen my understanding for law and the way the appellate court works. For one, I never knew that two briefs were written for one case, one being the opinion and the other being the response. I learned about past court decisions that were referenced in order to a response to the Appellant such as, Blakely vs. Washington and The United States vs. Booker.

I also noticed a bias towards the appellant by the file clerk, when he was explaining to the processes of the Criminal and Immigration appellate cases, he made it seem as if there are too many appellant who are successful at their hearings, and this was exemplified in both cases I read.

More about Us Vs. Charles Thomas

Open Document