Urban Legend Essay

2100 Words5 Pages

The evolution and survival of Urban Legends have positive, negative and historical impact on humans. They shape and make the thought of most people. This also adds on to the truth revealed and mysteries of Urban Legends. Urban Legends are “those bizarre, whimsical, 99 percent apocryphal, yet believable stories that are too good to be true” (James). People often believe them even though there are many contradicting facts against them. Urban Legends tend to reflect fears and horrible nightmares. They also are most likely to be the start or the cause of these fears existing. Most of the time, legends suggest rewards for good actions or thoughts. The worst punishments are often suggest to be for bad behavior (Wickersham). This supports the …show more content…

It can literally make a legend die faster or last longer. The cultural sens brings relevance to the story. The urban legend may not be as effective to the listener if the listener cannot relate. For example, the urban legend of “La Llorona” some people can relate to it because of the cultural background. Others can relate because they lived in the neighborhood and were raised through that urban legend. “It is the lack of information that gives rise to new legends or retelling” (Whipps). The lack of information and details gives the storyteller the freedom to create their own version that can be more relatable to the audience. Cultural effects applies to another topic which is “Same but Different”. Many urban legends are different but similar in some way or in certain views. There can be one story and multiple different versions throughout the world. The culture is what brings it to life. Cultural gives the legends importance. There can be a legend with completely same plot but different information and details are being shared to fit the location (Stubberfield). For instance, you cannot telling an urban legend about the hot and dry weather if you are in Antarctica. It wouldn’t make sense. That is why there needs to be a little freedom for the

Open Document