Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
health care policy formation
essay on health policy health care reform
essay on health policy health care reform
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: health care policy formation
There is no doubt that health care is an extremely important aspect of our daily lives since it is a safety net if you were to ever have any health complications which could potentially be more monetarily impactful and ultimately prevent you from getting treatment due to a lack of upfront cash. The real question is should it be the responsibility of the U.S. Government to have national health care for it its citizens? I personally find it hard to back the national health care not because of the idea of giving all citizens health care but for the technicalities involved. • Defining Universal Health Insurance o From countries that have single payer health care systems or health care systems that are heavily controlled by the government there …show more content…
This is the case for both the GDP and per capita(Jacqueline Brux). You may be asking how does this make sense we pay more for what seems to be a lower quality? In reality the United States is actually providing a much higher quality as a base level for health care expenditures in comparison to other countries who have horrible base care. Also in the long run countries with national health care end up paying more in the long term than most because the costs of the services are rising based on demand, budgeting deficits, and constant tax increases. Imagine a tax increase for health care in the United States we throw hissy fits over tax increases for education health care would be pushing the line to …show more content…
If you were to remove the privatization of the health care industry you would cause there to be even steeper prices to pay since most medical practitioners want to appeal to people by being the lowest prices and highest quality so that people feel inclined to take their business to them rather than to a competitor . This competitive market is actually beneficial in the sense that it allows people to find the price range that suits the most. o To compliment that you also push not only the medical staffs but the entire industry to find new cures or alternatives that all for the market to improve in quality or innovate the industry by making it more efficient or service. I genuinely believe every person should have the right to good health care, but I think it would be more detrimental at this point to fully implement a system in which only the government is regulating the market. Health care should be given to those who cannot afford it but should not affect those who already have a health care framework in place which is what policies like Obamacare have tried to do by somewhat punishing people for keeping their health care plans by making the market have to be more competitive and reducing the quality that you are getting for what you have to
The U.S. Constitution is a good foundation for implementing health care for people all over the world and article 1 section 8 clause 1 explains the power of government when it comes to health care. According to the Enduring Democracy book, "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States..." (Dautrich, C-5). In other words, the government has the power to allow everyone the right to health care since our taxes are already being collect for the common defense and general welfare. General welfare refers to health care in which the government may provide.
It 's called universal health care, and it 's a system followed by nearly every modern nation in the world and even some not-so-modern nations. In America the practice medicine is pretty awful, the health care system is very corrupt system, the politicians get richer (including Hilary Clinton), and the American people (middle class and poor) get the worst of it. You see a young mother who was diagnosed with cancer and she has to travel to Canada to get the medicine that she needs; she has to lie to get her medicine once she is in Canada, but she is willing to do it instead of continue to be denied here in the U.S. If I was diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis in the early or late 1990’s; I definitely would not receive health care coverage or my co-pay and the cost of my MS medicine would have sky
The United States healthcare system should not be universal because the government should not decide the healthcare choices of it’s citizens. Citizens should be allowed to choose the doctor and coverage they want at the price they are willing to pay. Universal healthcare would not only degrade the medical industry, but it will force people to pay for something they don’t necessarily need, or want. The current healthcare system is a perfect example of government intervention of a free market. Such a system violates the rights of patients, doctors, and businessmen.
Health care can benefit everyone and their different income values. Health care should be required and the risk of spending on insurance should be taken even if many Americans believe they do not need health insurance. There are always possibilities of emergencies occurring and in need of insurance for the high costs of medical care. I personally believe and argued my opinion that health care needs to be required for everyone. To conclude my argument, I have argued that there are more benefits to have healthcare insurance required and that everyone in America deserves a happy and healthy
Health care should be a human right. It shouldn’t be a privilege that individuals have to pay for, it should be provided to everyone. In 2017 Bernie Sanders said, “Every man, woman and child in our country should be able to access the health care they need regardless of
While most countries around the world have some form of universal national health care system, the United States, one of the wealthiest countries in the world, does not. There are much more benefits to the U.S. adopting a dorm of national health care system than to keep its current system, which has proved to be unnecessarily expensive, complicated, and overall inefficient.
America is known for democracy, freedom, and the American Dream. American citizens have the right to free speech, free press, the right to bear arms, and the right to religious freedom to name a few. The Declaration of Independence states that American citizens have the rights including “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” America promises equality and freedom and the protection of their rights as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. But with all the rights and freedoms that American citizens enjoy, there is one particular area where the United States seems to be lacking. That area is health care. The United States is the only industrialized nation that doesn’t have some form of legal recognition of a right to health care (Yamin 1157). Health care reform in the United States has become a major controversy for politicians, health care professionals, businesses, and citizens. Those in opposition to reform claim that health care is not a human right, therefore the government should not be involved. Supporters of reform believe that health care is most definitely a human right and should be available to everyone in the United States instead of only those who can afford it, and that it is the government’s responsibility to uphold that right.
The healthcare system in our society today needs to be changed, and you would think if you had insurance you 're fully covered. With or without insurance people every day is being denied the help that they need and the government is doing nothing about it. As a country were supposed to be able to depend on our government in our time of need, even something as simple as health care. If we can 't depend on our government to help us when we are sick who are we supposed to turn to. Even in other countries like Europe for example, their government provides them with free healthcare. When you compare the two countries as far as health wise Europeans are living a lot longer than American due to getting the proper health care they need from the government.
However, the US is in a great deal of debt currently and allowing something so expensive to arise would only bring it into even ore debt. At least 33 of the worlds riches countries provide Universal Healthcare such as :Norway, New Zealand, Japan, Germany, Belgium, United Kingdom, Kuwait, Sweden, Bahrain, Canada, Netherlands and a few others. However, they are not in as great of debt as we are. Therefore, we should not supply Universal Healthcare simply due to the fact it is to expensive for us to afford and even if we did provide it there would still be negative effects in the long
The demand for medical care is derived from our demand for good health. Michael Grossman was the first to do econometric research on this topic. “Grossman’s work established two approaches for consideration. In the first, medical care is viewed as an input in the production function for health, and in the second, as an output produced by medical care providers (Henderson, p.142).” There are two main factors that determine the demand for medical care. The first is the patient factor. This includes a patient’s health status, demographic characteristics and economic status. The second is the physician factor. This is an interesting topic because it introduces the principal (patient)-agent (physician) problem. We are faced with the problem of diminishing marginal returns for health. At a certain point, we can only produce so much health. The question we need to ask ourselves is what is the optimal budget for medical care? This is a question that can not be easily answered due to our changing demand for medical care. If we get sick we demand more medical attention. Or, if we choose to live more dangerously this will also increase the demand. Therefore, who should pay for these increased costs for medical insurance? “Medical care spending is not the only thing that improves health. Other factors affecting health status, such as life-style, environmental pollution, and technological developments, will shift the total product curve (TV).” Figure 4.1, on the next page graphically shows that health status obeys the Law of diminishing productivity. The graph below the total product curve is the marginal product curve. The derivative of the total product curve is the marginal product curve. This curve represents the marginal change in health status. You can see this curve is negatively sloped and can be negative. The maximum point on the total product curve is the total amount of health that we can get out of life. You may know from calculus that the slope of a line at a maximum or minimum is zero. If you look down on the corresponding point on the marginal product curve it lies on the x-axis. All medical treatment after this point is negative. What does this mean? Yes, medical treatment can be harmful to your health if too much is applied. A good example of this is an X-ray. The radiation from multiple X-rays is extremely dangerous. This negat...
However, according to Jenna Flannigan, write at Healthline.com, America’s current for-profit system allows for competition between medical and pharmaceutical companies which drives prices up astronomically. “In countries where health insurance is government-run or nonprofit-run, there is no profit factor to drive up prices…For example, a typical bypass surgery in the Netherlands costs about $15,000 while in the United States it costs about $75,000” (Flannigan). This figure illustrates how the US’s needless competition between private, for-profit organizations make medical care unnecessarily unattainable to those who aren’t very affluent or do not have comprehensive medical care. These bloated prices do not even contribute to better care a majority of the time, as pointed out by political consultant Karin J. Robinson. “Here in Britain, for instance, we spend about 8% of the country's annual GDP on health care, compared to 15% in the US, and yet the overall health of the population is similar, with perhaps even a slight advantage for the UK” (Robinson). America’s current system is far more expensive, but for what reason? A healthcare system should be driven a will to help those in need, not for the personal gain of companies that are rife with greed. America needs to follow the path of other first-world nations and take a different approach to
In many other countries the health care is government controlled and all citizens are provided government assisted health care. Most systems over in Europe are indeed government controlled and are taxed my wages. The United States government does not pay for most of its citizens healthcare in contrast. If you are fournate enough to afford insurance it's usually through your employer. In comparssion almost all government operated insurances provide better care for babies and pregant mothers than the United States system of health care. The United States system are more flexible than government aided systems though.
...mplications that allow for opportunities of change. One of the presumptions is for training and staffing (Shi & Singh, 2012). With the utilization of health care improvements, the staff will need additional instructions on the performance of equipment and how to efficiently achieve the desired results. Managers or supervisors recognize the need for supplemental staffing and training to optimize patient satisfaction and quality of care. The health care administrator must also focus on changes in insurance policies and rules governing the provision of medical assistance (Shi & Singh, 2012).
The real problem with the health care system in this country is not just the people running it but mainly the massive pit of debt it is continually digging. America spends around 17%, which is about $2.5 trillion of our GDP on health care alone! It is safe to say we spend nearly more than any other country out there. Where is all of this money going though, are they just giving it away to those in need of free medicine or people who cant pay there doctors bills? Most of the money spent is on regulations, research on medicines and failures of medicines that may have not made the “cut” to be on the market.
It is interesting with how different America’s health care is from everyone else in the world. Most are universal, required to have health care. We are trying to accomplish that in America, but many don’t like being taxed if they don’t have it. There definitely is a lot we can learn from other countries. Overall Switzerland has a great system set up, with the United Kingdom behind them. Japan is also on track. America is definitely trying to make head way, and eventually will. It all comes down to weighing what is most important, cost, quality, or access to health care.