Universal Health Care Is Not Relatively Recent Historical Development

963 Words4 Pages
Approximately 257.8 millions individuals living in the United States of America, every one of them need effective, affordable and accessible health care coverage and services. Within the past thirty to forty years, the preview and cost of health care coverage and services has draciasilly changed, compare to the manner in which health care was previously managed. With the recent development and passages of President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, often called Obamacare, a debate over whether a government to guarantee universal health care for its citizens has grown to a higher importance. Universal health care is not relatively recent historical development; the idea was first proposed in the United States by former president “Franklin D. Roosevelt as one of his New Deal aspirations, followed by Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton” (Miller). However, for so long, opponents of universal health care known as system which guarantees universal access to health care services to all Americans – seem to ignore the current healthcare system and the societal benefits associated with universal health care. To fully understand the advantage or disadvantage of a universal access system, one must analyze the economic benefit which corresponds with national health care, and the effect of such systems in other nations (international). Universal healthcare not only promotes morality in American societies, but it also supports economic prosperity in every facet of the community. Vincent Meconi explains the amount of money currently spent on health expenditures in the United States: “The United States is spending over 15 percent of its gross domestic product on health care” (Meconi 1). Further, Meconi explains how the US gets the l... ... middle of paper ... ...its citizens and when observing statistics concerning the cost of health expenditures and the quality of care, it is clear: the United States must switch to a system of national health care. Not only is universal coverage the most moral option available to the public, as it dramatically reduces easily avoidable deaths and disease, but a system of universal access is economically advantageous, an issue particularly persuasive when considering the current economic status of the United States. While the nation has seen small changes emerging in the recent years to attempt to transition to such a state (namely through the Affordable Care Act), the government must do more. An individual mandate alone is not enough to guarantee the health of the American citizens, but implementing a system of universal coverage is what is moral and beneficial for all of American society.

More about Universal Health Care Is Not Relatively Recent Historical Development

Open Document