United States v. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft’s Abusive Practices Towards Becoming a Monopoly

In this essay, the author

• Explains that microsoft corporation american is a multinational corporation based in redmond, washington, that specializes in developing, manufacturing, licensing, supporting and selling software for computers.
• Explains that microsoft was created by bill gates and paul allen in 1975 in albuquerque, new mexico. their passion for computer programming allowed them to succeed in the industry.
• Explains that microsoft is currently market dominant in the ibm pc-compatible operating system and office software markets with their ever popular microsoft office program. microsoft also makes an extensive array of additional software for desktop computers and servers.

• Explains that microsoft corporation american is a multinational corporation based in redmond, washington, that specializes in developing, manufacturing, licensing, supporting and selling software for computers.
• Explains that microsoft was created by bill gates and paul allen in 1975 in albuquerque, new mexico. their passion for computer programming allowed them to succeed in the industry.
• Explains that microsoft is currently market dominant in the ibm pc-compatible operating system and office software markets with their ever popular microsoft office program. microsoft also makes an extensive array of additional software for desktop computers and servers.
• Explains that steve ballmer and bill gates are two very important people in the microsoft corporation.
• Explains how ballmer led numerous microsoft divisions, including the operations team, operating systems development division, and sales and support. gates gave up his day-to-day activities when he stepped down as chief software architect in 2006.
• Introduces bill gates, the co-founder of microsoft, who has found success as an investor, programmer, and inventor.
• Explains that gates was the ceo and chief software architect at microsoft, and has been condemned for his unfair approach to the business.
• Explains that he resigned as chief executive officer of microsoft in january 2000. he stayed on as chairman and gave himself the position of chief software architect. his last day as a full-time employee was on june 27, 2008.
• Explains that united states v. microsoft corporation was a us antitrust law case, finally taken care of by the department of justice.
• Explains that the case was brought against microsoft on the 18th of may 1998 by the united states department of justice and had the backing of us 20 states.
• Explains that microsoft packaged its flagship web browsing software, internet explorer, with all windows operating systems to beat out competing web browsers. this limited the market for rivals like opera and netscape navigator.
• Explains that the u.s. government became interested in microsoft in 1991 when the federal trade commission inquired because they believed that microsoft was abusing the market share stranglehold it had involving pc operating systems. the department of justice began a new exploration of microsoft’s practices later on in the year.
• Explains that microsoft would claim that their web browser internet explorer was in-fact a feature, which according to the past settlement enabled microsoft to package explorer to microsoft windows.
• Explains that the united states v. microsoft corporation case began on the 18th of may, 1998, when the department of justice and the attorneys general of twenty us states came forward and tried to sue microsoft for unlawfully preventing its rivals from gaining market share.
• Analyzes how bill gates was "evasive and nonresponsive" when interrogated when he questioned the meaning of the words "compete", "concerned," "ask", and "we".
• Explains that microsoft provided several videotapes throughout the trial, with one that demonstrated that with the removal of their web browser internet explorer, microsoft windows would experience a reduced operating speed and possible malfunctions.
• Analyzes how microsoft released their assertion that windows is hindered by internet explorer uninstalling. the united states government made its own video recording of the procedure and revealed that the recording submitted by microsoft's had opportunely not shown an intricate and challenging segment.
• Analyzes how microsoft protected itself in the media and stated that their efforts to revolutionize the industry were being quashed by opposing businesses that were envious at the accomplishments of microsoft.
• Analyzes how the independent institute ran an ad in the washington post and new york titled "an open letter on antitrust protectionism." the institute defends microsoft by saying that it was not consumers of the technology that brought this lawsuit to court but the rivals of microsoft.
• Describes judge thomas penfield jackson's findings of fact on the united states vs. microsoft case.
• Analyzes how the judge concluded that microsoft's exclusionary behavior in the internet access provider channel was unjustified.
• Explains that judge jackson advised that microsoft be split into two parts, one dealing with the technology and assets to the windows os and its further versions, while the other would operate the microsoft office business software, its web properties and the rights to internet explorer.
• Explains that plaintiffs wanted to surpass the court of appeals, hoping to go directly to the supreme court in order to end the case as quickly as possible.
• Explains that the appeals court overruled jackson's rulings on microsoft, stating that jackson violated the code of conduct of us judges by giving embargoed interviews while the case was being put forth.
• Explains that the department of justice affirmed that it would not be seeking to break up microsoft into smaller, separate companies, but were seeking a less severe penalty for their anti-trust activities.
• Explains that the department of justice affirmed that it would not be seeking to break up microsoft into smaller, separate companies, but were seeking a less severe penalty for their anti-trust activities.
• Explains that the department of justice agreed to settle the case with microsoft on november 2nd, 2001. microsoft would share the interfaces of its application programs with other computer companies and assign a board of three individuals that would have access to the systems, records and codes used for sourcing by microsoft from the past decade.
• Explains how the appeals court allowed microsoft's settlement with the department of justice, despite numerous objections.
• Analyzes the impact of the united states v. microsoft case on microsoft and the web browser market.
• Explains that microsoft has lost the web browser market share with google chrome in the lead, followed by internet explorer, with firefox hot on their heels.
• Opines that the court case where the united states took on the computer and technology juggernaut microsoft was necessary to benefit the consumer.
• Explains that the influx of new web browsers made available benefitted the consumer in several ways. microsoft loss as a monopoly also meant they could no longer set prices.
• Cites gates deposition makes judge laugh in court. the microsoft monopoly: the facts, the law and the remedy.
• Opines that microsoft wants you to'rethink' that opinion. still think internet explorer sucks?