From western expansion to foreign imperialism the United States has always been an expansionist country. Early America’s focus was to conquer the natives and obtain western land within North America, but in the latter of America’s history, specifically in the nineteenth and twentieth century, foreign imperialism became the new focus. America’s activity in foreign imperialism was a continuation and departure of the United States’ early expansionism. It was a continuation in terms of manifest destiny, the spread of Christianity, and by the concept of “the city on a hill” and a departure in terms of foreign involvement.
Imperialism is defined as a policy to dominant other countries and rule them. Then, these new colonies surrender their markets, industries, and resources to their invaders. “US imperialism, supported by US politicians, was intended to bring profits to US manufacturers (capitalists)…” (lecture4-p13). Although the period of 1890-1910 is usually known as “the age of the US imperialism”, the US imperialism is not limited to that era. Overseas imperialism began during 1890-1910 with the invasion of Hawaii, Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines, which was an attempt to expand the American’s territory to reach natural resources such as minerals, timber, oil, and land. These new territories could also provide corporations with cheap workers and military bases. There have been numerous other examples of the US imperialism. Starting from North America, the US government took over the Pacific Ocean and found its way into Asia. “A State Department list... shows 103 interventions in the affairs of other countries between 1798 and 1895” (Zinn-12), including Argentina, Uruguay, China, Angola, Nicaragua, and Japan to protect American’s interests in those countries. The same motivation was pursued in attacking Vietnam. According to Zinn, the main reason of the US intervention in WWII was to follow its imperial interests. “For those interests, in the thirties, an anti-Soviet
The article by Saull looks at imperialism and how it is shifting and the role that globalization is playing in the new American Empire. The article also looks at what an empire is and the roots of it which has to do a lot with Bush. The article looks at how during the 1990s we had become dominated by debates over globalization and the degree to how this was all about seeing the “retreat of the state.” The article also looks at how we have become a theoretical rupture which they say is because of the Cold War and by the end of it, the U.S. was more about multilateralism and globalization which was promoted by the Clinton administration. The roots of American Empire are found in the ideological origins of the U.S. and the international political, economic and military structures that were established by the U.S when they were in the Cold War. Bush is more about global strategy that is based on U.S. primacy which came to be at the end of the Cold War which has made it tempting but with Al-Qaeda the president could not constrain himself any longer from it. An empire is a formal and direct rule, hierarchical domination of one society to another, and it is also accompanied by direct extraction or surplus on tribute. The international system has evolved a lot over the years such as at first the countries were about themselves and securing their political power/ stability and economic growth has been replaced by separating the political-territorial control from economic wealth and power. It has been conditioned by the logic of economic exploitation and domination. . Saull was good and he really talked about what it means to be an empire which really helped in seeing his viewpoint in the article. He is only centered on the home front and ...
The first reason under which the United States decided to emulate the model of Imperialism was based on its ideological and religious arguments. These started with the Rationales’ beliefs that America’s ideas and institutions were superior compared with any other country in the world. For example, some Americ...
Throughout the course of history, nations have invested time and manpower into the colonizing and modernizing of more rural governments. Imperialism has spread across the globe, from the British East India Company to France’s occupation of Northern Africa. After their founding in 1776, the United States of America largely stayed out of this trend until The Spanish-American War of 1898. Following the war, the annexation and colonization of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines ultimately set a precedent for a foreign policy of U.S. imperialism.
Immediately following the war with Spain, the United States had both the political will to pursue imperial policies and the geopolitical circumstances conducive to doing so. But the way in which these policies would manifest was an open question; was the impulse to actively remake the world in America’s Anglo-Saxon image justified? Hence, there were several models of American imperialism at the turn of the twentieth century. In the Philippines, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and Samoa, the United States asserted unwavering political control. In Cuba, and later throughout most of the Caribbean basin, the economic and political domination of customarily sovereign governments became the policy. Ultimately, the United States was able to expand its territory
Imperialism; a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. This is what the United States is known for between 1850 and 1920. The U.S. made Cuba a protectorate, exerted influence to China and Japan, intervened in Latino America and Mexico, and annexed: Hawaii, Philippines, and Puerto Rico. The United States became a large and strong nation by concurring or influencing territories. This was the beginning to the United States' way to becoming a world power.
After the civil war, United States took a turn that led them to solidify as the world power. From the late 1800s, as the US began to collect power through Cuba, Hawaii, and the Philippines, debate arose among historians about American imperialism and its behavior. Historians such as William A. Williams, Arthur Schlesinger, and Stephen Kinzer provides their own vision and how America ought to be through ideas centered around economics, power, and racial superiority.
In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, Imperialism was a popular trend among the large, powerful countries. Imperialism is defined as “The policy of extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political hegemony over other nations” Imperialism cannot be said as either good or bad, but as a general rule; If you live in an annexed country, imperialism is not good, if your country annexes smaller ones to gain profit, land, and respect, then imperialism is good. The United States was not much of an imperialistic country until we won the Spanish-American war. As a result of this war, we annexed Guam, The Philippines, and Puerto Rico. This is the point at which the US becomes and imperialistic nation, and though it was a hard struggle to keep these annexed countries under control and eventually gave them all back to their rightful owners. The importance of taking these countries is that we then could have coal stations around the world to fuel our navy, and we got respect from other countries around the war. This respect and intimidation helped the allied powers defeat the central powers during World War II. Ever since the US became the most powerful nation after the Spanish-American war, we have retained the title.
Many world powers are empires seeking to conquer others, reclaim land that was once theirs, and achieve economic and military domination. Merriam Webster defines an empire as “a major political unit having a territory of great extent or a number of territories or peoples under a single sovereign authority” (Merriam). Conversely, America seeks to create world freedom and peace, rather than world domination. The United States has involved itself in numerous wars in the nineteenth century. At a glance, it can appear that America is an empire seeking to gain control of foreign territory; however, America is not expanding overseas, but instead it is defending world freedom and peace. America has assumed the role of an international defender, fighting