Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Under armour case study conclusion
Under armour case study conclusion
Nike vs under armour essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Under armour case study conclusion
Since its founding in 1996, Under Armour has resoundingly been touted as the fastest growing sports-apparel brand in today’s global market. It’s current sales see an escalating trend to $20 billion by 2025 which solidifies their spot as a secondary competitor to Nike. With the company's surprising ascension above Adidas in 2015, market analysts project that “Under Armour is growing at an even faster pace than Nike, as well as Adidas — the two biggest sportswear companies in the world” (Peterson, 2015). Today they are an international force that competes in bidding wars for athletic endorsements, aggressively expanding into growing consumer markets that label them as the anti-Nike. Proving investors wrong, Under Armor unprecedentedly heightened their sales demographic with great focus on the youth, female, digital application and footwear based markets in recent years. By 2011 they achieved such international endeavors by establishing brand stores in China and increasing their lingering influence in other regions like Europe and Latin America. Utilizing various mantras similar to its competitors, Under Armour marketing executive, Adrienne Lofton, …show more content…
Teaming up with Adidas and Ralph Lauren designer, Tim Coppens, the team looks to ignite a new brand that is "designed to capture the existing opportunity of a collection that goes beyond the comforts of casual active wear and the trusted functionality of innovative athletic wear" (McNew, 2016).
The result of the endeavor could estimate $15 billion, extending the brand to a young, casual and urbanized demographic. Awaiting its future launch, the sneak-preview in September 2016 has seen positive approval from notable names in fashion. Although an ambitious move nonetheless, consumers and athletes could see an unprecedented brand range seen both on and off the
Under Armour’s product is swim gear. They sell their product by doing what Adidas did, used motivation, emotion, and a message to connect with the audience. But, Under Armour used a famous celebrity named Michael Phelps. The audience starts to pay attention to the ad and either feels connected or wants to be a better athlete like Phelps. Under Armour finally manipulated their audience into buying their
day. lululemon athletica uses fabrics for their apparel that are most suitable for athletic pursuits. The main fabric that they use is called “luon”, which is a mixture of spandex and nylon. The sizes that lululemon athletica offers range from US sizes 2-12 in their tops, bottoms, sports bras, and outerwear. Since lululemon athletica caters to men and women, their product mixes for each gender vary a bit.
Advantage: Expanding the sale of products in foreign countries will help UA to become a global competitor in the world market for sport apparel and performance products; enhancing the global awareness of UA brand name and strengthening the appeal of UA products worldwide.
They could overtake Adidas if they continue with their innovative strategy because they’re only $3.5 billion away. Since now-a-days consumers are all about technology and new innovative products, if Under Armour continues with their innovative strategy they will continue to see an increase of financial growth, become a major competitor for Adidas, and a closer competitor to Nike.
Under Armour is a leading athletic clothing line directed towards the overall athlete who is looking for the most comfort during extracurricular activities. The mission of the company is, "to provide the world with technically advanced products engineered with exclusive fabric construction, supreme moisture management, and proven innovation. In short, every Under Armour product is doing something for you; it's making you better."
Under Amour Company ventured into a market segment that was overcrowded, it had thousands of companies that competed against each other. Out of the many companies involved in the trade, the two most formidable threats seemed to be orchestrated by Nike and Adidas. These are two giant sports apparel and footwear, which pride themselves as having been long term veterans in the industry. Nike in particular was christened as the ultimate shoe and athletic apparel company with revenues of $18.6 billion, net income of $1.9 billion and more than thirty two thousand employees globally in the year 2008. This makes it the largest athletic shoe and apparel seller in the world. This company has seen major expansions in outlets throughout the world over the years. Adidas on its part has managed to build a powerful brand through its technological innovations and aggressive marketing where they spend up to thirteen per cent of their revenue besides offering high quality services. These scenarios seem to present Under Armour with a massive competitive disadvantage.
The sports apparel and accessories industry has a highly competitive market. Businesses are constantly competing for elite athletes to sponsor, raw materials, and every opportunity to expand. Under Armour is able to not only survive but thrive in this market because of their ability to think outside of the box. They are constantly creating new and exciting products that help athletes everywhere.
Nike’s goal is to remain unique and different from others in terms of the items offered on the market. Arguably, Nike belongs to a monopolistically competitive market as there only a few organizations with the ability to regulate the amount charged for their product which means they cannot make their prices high as this is likely to make customers move on to other available choices (Nike, Inc., 2012). However, Nike can find a balance between the prices to charge for their products and remaining competitive with other companies in the industry. Nike has formed a distinction between the appearance and performance of their footwear and that of their competitors. Although products are differentiated from other companies, they still influence each other because they are items of the same
...ses at 100 times faster, and get a more productive IT Landscape that can reduce wastes and become more efficient, and a business community that makes faster decisions which is the primary focus of Under Armour.
Currently, Nike is the world’s leading innovator in athlete footwear, apparel, equipment and accessories. The company has had many successes since its’ beginning such as being named the No. 1 Most Innovative Company in Fast Company magazine’s annual ranking of the world’s top 50 innovators in February 2013, being awarded top honours by the Corporate Register Reporting Awards (CRRA) for Innovation in Reporting and Best Overall Report in April 2013 and also having Nike VP of Sustainable Business & Innovation, Hannah Jones, honoured as one of the three recipients of the 2013 C.K. Prahalad Awards, a prestigious award giving to companies, individuals and...
There are as many brands as there is ants in the world, but the two brands that pop out are adidas and nike. Those two brands have been going head to head for ages to see who is the better brand. It’s been tested, compared, and debated which brand is better. Whether it’s the quality of the materials or the cost of it, the debate is ongoing. Both brands have been fighting for the top ever since they were both created and I don’t blame them it’d be fantastic to be the best brand in the world. When Nike and adidas are contrasted, it becomes clear that the Adidas brand are better for the overall consumer and enhances sport performance than Nike.
Nike’s focus for fashion forward women is the following: lead the athleisure trend, increase advertising, and the introduce the #BetterForIt social media campaign. We need to focus on the athleisure trend by increasing our portfolio for the women target market. Athleisure is already 20% of the firm’s revenue and we need to recognize that women are leading this fashion movement. Under Armor and Lululemon are already making headways in this fashion focused market. We need to emphasize our athletic technologies, promoting lighter fabrics and better performance, while still maintaining a level of comfort and fashionability. Increasing the portfolio means nothing if women don’t know we’ve done just that. Nike will need to increase advertising specifically with this target market in mind. The #BetterForIt campaign is one important aspect of these advertising efforts. Similar campaigns should promote and help “normalize” athletic wear in everyday
Under Armour has always set aggressive targets for themselves and they should not change that now. The leadership team believes that “a 3% share of the (athletic footwear) market would nearly double UA’s total revenue” (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2015, 2012, 2010), and this should be another one of the metrics that Under Armour monitors and grows.
Nike’s positioning in the market has more of a mass appeal compared to their main competitor Adidas who strive to make products for elite athletes. The positioning strategy for Nike is currently working at a satisfactory level as Nikes global annual sales between 2013-2014 was reported as 27.8 billion (Statista, 2014) compared to Adidas’ 19.95 billion (Statista, 2014). The global market for sports apparel is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 4% between 2012-2019, Nikes compound annual growth rate during 2010-2012 was 12.3% which is an excellent result as the brand’s growth was larger than the market as well as outgrowing Nike’s closest competitors Adidas, Puma and Asics (Forbes,
According to global industry analyst, the world sports clothing industry is anticipated to exceed $126 billion by 2015, Because of more active lifestyle, with older demographics and woman becoming more energetic, this drives the market. The entire sports clothing industry is highly filled with so many brands like Nike, Adidas, Umbro and Reebook all over the world competing, even the high leading brands have to work twice has hard in other to keep their share in the market because most of this small firm have quality products and also a very fine marketing style which has increased competing style in the industry. All over the world people demand more versatile wear, which indicates that’s retailers continue to produce new style of sports clothing for both men and women.