UN Peacekeeping Case Study

When conflict arises in third world countries and indication that human right abuses are being violated in third world countries, the international community is frequently called upon to deploy forces and troops to try and combat growing tension and retain the peace . The United Nations often receives this call. The United Nations was founded on four simple principles and purposes; to maintain peace throughout the international community, to develop friendly relations among nations, to help nations work together to progress the lives of poor people, to overcome hunger, disease and illiteracy, and serve as the center for harmonizing the actions of nations to achieve these goals. There is no other organization in the world that embodies as

Throughout its history the United Nations has sought to preserve fundamental human rights as well as promote social progress and better the standards of life throughout every corner of the world. UN peacekeeping operations are deployed with the consent of the main parties to the conflict. This requires a commitment by the parties to a political process. Their acceptance of a peacekeeping operation provides the UN with the necessary freedom of action, both political and physical, to carry out its mandated tasks. In the absence of such consent, a peacekeeping operation risks becoming a party to the conflict; and being drawn towards enforcement action, and away from its fundamental role of keeping the peace. The fact that the main parties have given their consent to the deployment of a United Nations peacekeeping operation does not necessarily imply or guarantee that there will also be consent at the local level, particularly if the main parties are internally divided or have weak command and control systems. Universality of consent becomes even less probable in volatile settings, characterized by the presence of armed groups not under the control of any of the parties, or by the presence of other

Everything it does which helps prevent World War III is good. Everything which does not further that goal, either directly or indirectly, is at best superfluous.’ Conflict and war is not the same as if was decades or centuries ago, many of today’s conflicts and wars are within states not amongst state against state. The end of the Cold War removed constraints that had inhibited conflict in the former Soviet Union and elsewhere. As a result there has been a rash of wars within newly independent States, often of a religious or ethnic character and often involving unusual violence and cruelty. Often this cruelty takes the form in inhumane human right abuses. The protection and promotion of human rights is central in dealing with conflicts. Essentially, whether through diplomatic means or by use of force the ultimate aim of any intervention is to restore peace and order, thereby creating an environment in which people can exercise the enjoyment of their rights. Human rights are universal, indivisible and equal. The need and universality of human rights means that governments and international institutions regard human rights as essential in promoting peace, democracy and the rule of law. Increasingly, human rights have become important in international