Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
nature of plagiarism
essays on the type of plagiarism
different types of plagiarism out of the classroom
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: nature of plagiarism
Cryptomnesia or unconscious plagiarism (UP)
This term means that a person thinks they have found a new idea, yet it is actually an old memory. (Bredart, Lampinen & Defeldre, 2003). Brown and Murphy (1989) say it explains plagiarism of songs lyrics and words. For example, artist’s blamed of copying song lyrics may have heard them before but forgotten about it. This means that the brain can recall lots of information yet can forget it just as easily. There is a large amount of research that has examined how these processes take place.
Johnson’s source monitoring framework (JSMF)
JSMF is the main framework that explains this type of plagiarism (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993). It says that external sources can directly affect how we encode knowledge. This means that different situations can delay our memory processes. JSMF explains how memory makes it difficult for us to generate original ideas.
JSMF explains heuristics; unconscious and fast ways of thinking that make reasoning easier. As heuristics are errors in thinking, these errors are related to poor encoding, as seen in UP. In addition, previous settings can sway how we react to information. JSMF outlines how private factors influence heuristic use more than outside factors. For example, past incidents can physically change the way the brain makes future choices (Chaiken, Liberman, & Eagly, 1989).
Alternative Frameworks
Other scientists have used models to understand UP. These include word-search tasks, elaboration models and age-related experiments. Three experiments are discussed below.
Experiment 1
Overview
Experiment one was a word-search task extending past research by Marsh and Bower (1993). It aimed to test two different concepts. Firstly, to test how rela...
... middle of paper ...
...UP
There are many factors associated with UP. To date, internal factors are highly correlated with UP. Oral and written tasks and semantic and episodic memory directly effect UP (Brown & Murphy, 1989). Age has a small effect on UP and imagery a significant effect. Older adults are seen to generate new words when asked to recall a list of words. Imagery has been associated with higher levels of UP. Familiar and more commonly used terms have been associated with higher UP, as opposed to more unique and less familiar words (Marsh & Bower, 1993). UP has a large effect on many different situations.
Two techniques to minimise risk
In minimizing risks of cryptomnesia in students there are ways to reduce UP. Firstly, students can be careful the way they note down information. In doing big assignments, writing rewording sentences into own words can also be effective.
Altogether this study has helped us learn more about the brain and memory. Learning is measured thorough when a student can reiterate the right answer to a question. In this study, students in one conditions learned forging language vocabulary words in standard example of recurrent study exam trials. In three other conditions, once a student had correctly formed the language item, it was constantly studied but dropped from further testing. Repeatedly tested but dropped from the further study or just dropped from both the study and also the test. The results reveal the critical part of retrieval practice in combining education and shows that even college students seem naive of the fact.
Roediger III, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating False Memories: Remembering Words Not Presented in Lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cogntion, 21, 803-814.
The book, Other People’s Words: What Plagiarism Is and How to Avoid it, has taught me many things about plagiarism. Some of the things this book taught me are the definition and some ways to avoid plagiarism.
Marsh, R. L., Cook, G. I., & Hicks, J. L. (2006). The effect of context variability on source memory. Memory & Cognition (Pre-2011), 34(8), 1578-86.
“is a form of amnesia where someone is unable to recall events that occurred before the development of amnesia, even though [he or she] may be able to encode and memorize new things that occur after the onset,” (Mastin).
McNamara, T. P. and Holbrook, J. B. 2003. Semantic Memory and Priming. Handbook of Psychology. 445–474.
The serial position effect has been studied extensively for many years. Researchers have designed a variety of different studies in order to analyze and explain both, the primacy and the recency effect. The primacy effect is the tendency for the first items presented in a series of words to be recalled more easily, or to be more influential than those presented at the end of the list. On the other end, there is also the recency effect. The recency effect is the tendency to recall the items located at the end of the list. Many studies have been designed to analyze how the primacy effect works and its accuracy. For instance, research compared the primacy and the recency effect (Jahnke, 1965). Forty-eight college students read lists of 6, 10, and 15 English words in a counterbalanced order. Twenty-four of the students were given instructions for the immediate serial recall of the list; while the other half of students were not aware that they would need to recall words from a list. Both groups received a total of 12 different lists. The words were read at a rate of one word per sec without any emphasis on specific word. In addition to that, the participants’ responses were recorded in an interval of 30 seconds. Results showed that the recency effect is stronger for free serial recall and for a longer interval than primacy effect (Jahnke, 1965). When instructions were given for a serial recall, primacy effects were stronger and recency effect weaker than when instructions were given for free recall. As the length of lists increased, the recency effect became stronger and more accurate.
Although there was some criticisms about the above experiment, Craik and Tulving performed more experiments each time refining the D.O.P. model. There were thoughts that the structural tasks were easier and not as much time had to be spent on them therefore people did not have as long to look at those words and could not study them like the other tasks. Craik and Tulving then made the structural task take equally as long as the other tasks. The results remand the same as the previous experiments. Craik and Tulving also originally started with five tasks, but then narrowed it down to three to avoid a ceiling effect. The self-referent task was later added to model by Rogers.
Experiment 1 represents a replication of an experiment done by Bransford & Johnson in 1972. During their experiment they invoked a schema which is an organizational or conceptual pattern in the mind. They gave their participants different titles, some received a specific title and some received a non-specific title, some participants were given the title before the passage was read and some after the passage was read. After determining who got which title they read them a passage looking to see how many different ideas from the passage they could recall. They came to the conclusion that those who were given specific titles and that had them given to them prior to the passage was read were able to recall more then those that received a non-specific title or those that were given the title after the passage was read. The results do show that schemas do help with recall depending on how they are used and when. For our first replication of the experiment we decided to use one of their techniques of experimenting, which involved giving a specific title and a non-specific title.
Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814
often reappear in the persons mind when some event in the present triggers a familiarity with the past event
... insight into the mechanisms of precognition and allow us to design further studies to concretely prove its existence.
Reconstructive memory on the other hand, is an elaboration on memory that refers to the process of remembering of past events while being able to reconstruct the same experience previously. It involves remembering the generic, and general ideas of past events as well as having the same expectations and assumptions of something we have experienced similarly from the past. These so-called reconstructed
What is false memory? False memory is a psychological phenomenon in which a person recollects something differently than the way it actually happened or recalls an event that never existed.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological review, 88(5), 375.