Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Requirements of a valid contract
Requirements of a valid contract
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Requirements of a valid contract
Types of contracts and examples Did you know that contracts can be classified by how and when they were formed so each contract has a strict set of ways they can be called? The types of contracts are bilateral contracts, unilateral, formal, informal, express, implied, executed, executory, valid, voidable, unenforceable and void. The first type of contract we will explore is a bilateral contract the definition of this contract is a promise for a promise. This contract will come in to play as soon as a promise is made to do something. If someone says that they will do something and someone else agrees to do something that will be this a bilateral contract. let’s say james Inc. and Braxton’s family made a contract offering Braxton family 12 …show more content…
The definition of this contract is formed by the conduct of the parties. This contract is saying that to form an implied contract there is certain things that must be there. One of them is a plaintive furnish someone’s property, that plaintiff expected to be paid and the defendant knows then that is an implied contract. An example would go something like this, daisy hires a local boy named blue to come and babysit her children. Blue agree to babysit the kids. Blue thought that daisy will come and bring the kids to him, although daisy was for sure that blue would come to her house for the …show more content…
another example of capacity would be if a legally intoxicated person goes and signs a contract which says that they would give someone there identy for 100 dollars. That’s why I like this because the contract would be void because the drunk person is not mentally stable to understand what they are doing. Different types of remedies Did you know that there are 4 types of remedies of a breach contract they consist of compensatory, consequential, punitive, and nominal damages? The first thing that I am going to be talking about is compensatory the book defines this as something used to cover direct losses and cost. Basically, saying that you would only get what your loss and you will not be in a can get more of what was lost. This also serves as a protector so many people do not have a lot of charge added on to what they have already an example of this would-be jimmy got fired from his job because his boss changed his mind about him, jimmy sues the boss for compensation but the boss will only have to pay as much as jimmy was off and was looking
The four elements of a contract are the agreement, the consideration, contractual capacity, and a legal object. The oral agreement between Sam and the chain store satisfies the agreement element of a contract definition because when the chain store offered to sell Sam 's invention at their stores, Sam accepted by agreeing to ship 1000 units in exchange. The second element of a contract, the “consideration of each party,” is satisfied because Sam and the chain store have something to give the other (1000 units of the invention in exchange for the exclusive sales of the product at their stores). The third element is “contractual capacity,” which may or may not be fulfilled since we do not know Sam 's age or whether
Liability in restitution with disgorgement of profit is an alternative to liability for contract damages measured by injury to the promisee.” (2011)
Quasi-contracts are sometimes called implied-in-law contracts, but they are not actually contracts. Rather, in order to prevent one party from being unjustly enriched at the expense of another, the courts impose contractual obligations on one of the parties as if that party had entered into a contract. This case would not reflect a quasi-contract as this would focus more if intent, offer and acceptance was not established verbally or written. In this case study there was a verbal agreement.
contract “refers to a contract drafted by one party in a position of power, leaving the weaker party
A unilateral contracts involves one party paying or promising another party something in return of preforming a certain task.
“A breach of contract is committed when a party without lawful excuse fails or refuses to perform what is due from him under the contract, or performs defectively or anticipates himself from performing.” The laws around breach of contract have often been criticized for their unfair results this may be because the law does not aim to punish the defendant to instead aim for restoration for the claimant. The inadequacy of compensation for breach of contract is a widely recognized problem. It seems that there are few cases where the claimant is able to claim their full damages generally they are given a nominal sum that seems almost irrelevant to the claim for damages it is only on rare occasions where the claimant is completely restored. It has been argued that unless the damages are adequately remedies the remedy is “ ...a hollow one stripped of all practical force and void of content.” There is much difficulty in determining how to award damages and this has often led to unfairness.When recovering damages for breach of contract, there are generally three types of interest that the courts consider in order to find the most just result for the claimant. These three interests are: Expectation interest, Restitution interest and reliance interest. Expectation interest is the most common of the three and is used even though it is often criticized for creating results that are not relative to the breach. This essay will reflect upon these three types of interest in order to prove that damages for breach of contract do not always create a fair result. This is because the law in this area is inconsistent, especially in relationship to restitution interest that appears to be more of an exception to a rule rather than a gateway to re...
A contract requires that the parties intend to enter into a legally binding agreement. That is, the parties entering into the contract must intend to create legal relations and must understand that the agreement can be enforced by law. The intention to create legal relations is presumed, so the contract doesn 't have to expressly state that you understand and intend legal consequences to follow. Stan insists that the $100.00 was a deposit on the car and was meant to be part of the contract to buy the car. Stan is very persistent and insistent that Jim and Laura have contracted to buy the car; therefore, the $100.00 will be applied to the purchase price of the car.
Entering into a service also means entering into an implied contract. For example, hiring a catering service. It is already implied that the caterer would want to be paid after the deliverance of the food. Implied contracts have a remedy created by courts called the quasi-contract or implied-in-law contracts. This contract is not an actual contract but a legal substitute formed to have equity between all the parties during the implied contract. The courts use this to avoid injustice during an obligation upon a non-contracting party.
Bilateral – The majority of offers are Bilateral. While it is not always true, most people make an offer to one named offeree or a small group of parties. Most contracts are made with both parties present on a face-to-face basis.
Equitable remedies are enforced when money damages does not adequately satisfy the non-breaching party. Some types of equitable remedies available are: Rescission which allows the non-breaching party to cancel their contractual responsibilities. Reformation whereby the parties can modify the contract so it reflects what each party’s responsibility will be. Lastly, specific performance which is a court order that requires the original contract to be fulfilled by the breaching party. On the other hand there are legal remedies which are monetary damages of one form or another that are awarded to the non-breaching party. These remedies include punitive damages that payments that are paid to the non-breaching party for full compensation and is also used to punish the guilty party and to deter them from participating in that manner again (“Remedies against,” n. d.). Consequential damages that will reimburse the innocent party for costs that resulted from the breach. Compensatory damages are given to the non-breaching party for the breach. Liquidation Damages are often awarded when it is difficult to determine the actual amount of damaged a party received due to a breach and collect attorney fees and costs incurred as a result of legal proceedings (“Remedies against,” n. d.). Some other remedies are cancellation and restitution which allows the non-breaching party to cancel the contract and sue for restitution if the breaching party received any benefits under the contract. Another remedy is nominal damages in which are small awards or tokens given to the non-breaching party when a breach occurs and there is usually no real money loss experienced by the non-breaching party in this matter (“Remedies against,” n.
A contract is an agreement between two parties under which one party promises to do something for the other in return for compensation (Morris, & Pinto, 2007). In essence, it is an obligation on both parties to fulfil their part of the agreement and operate within the framework of law. The parties involved are the purchaser and the supplier or the sponsor and the vendor. The contract is an essential document that outlines the agreement made by both parties. The contract should contain specific language detailing the requirements of both parties. The contract defines what was agreed upon by each party, a definition of what happens when things change, a definition of obligations, a definition of the relationship between the parties and the level
In the matter of quasi contractual liability a person must get unjust benefit which belongs to another person.
1.1 Explain at least four points of differentiations between contract and agreement with the help of examples.
Damages – if the other party cause’s drastic damages that cost the other party or affect it negatively than the other party can sue and take them to court of law, and the court may claim that the affected party may be paid and be taken back to its original position as it was
A contract is generally considered to be an exchange of promises or an agreement between parties which in due course legally binds the parties; this can be enforced by the English Law. A contract is always, referred to the basic foundations of Contract Law, which refers to promises being kept amongst two parties. It is clear that all people make contracts nowadays and do not even consider for a moment that they are forming contracts; these can be formal or informal, oral or written.