Vedder explains that universities in general believe that they can raise the price of tuition because due to the increasing amount of government aid to education, most notably student loans, the families haven’t been too concerned with the rising cost of education. He claims that there is a vicious circle in regards to university financing. In the first year, the tuition would be increased and to deal with the political pressure that comes with it, Congress makes student loans more accessible and affordable. As a result of this, the demand for education becomes greater and as such, the colleges are then able to raise prices again which would result in more political pressure and thus, more affordable loans. In order to deal with this growing problem, Vedder believes that the best way to do that would be to simply stop allowing these third parties to give more money when the tuition increases. By doing this, it would make the student more aware of the price of tuition, thus not as likely to enroll at a university with a relatively high cost of tuition.
College tuition has a bad name to it, and for a good reason. More students and paying parents are feeling defeated attempting to pay off loans that typically hang over a students head for a good amount of years after finishing their education and getting their degrees. While the government has attempted to try chip away at the $1.2 trillion debt that has accumulated for college students around the United States, they are no where near having a permanent solution that lets graduates get on with their life without struggling. There are a spectrum of problems that create this debt, and only a few solutions that match up with these problems.
Ask any college student to state one of their largest expenses and it would be safe to bet the response would be “Textbook prices!” The cost of purchasing required materials for courses has reached numbers high enough to cause many students to take out second loans. Information released this year by the American Enterprise Institute shows that “College textbook prices have increased faster than tuition, health care costs and housing prices, all of which have risen faster than inflation” (Kingkade, 2013). This information equates to an 812% increase in the cost of college textbooks over what they were just over thirty years ago (Kingkade, 2013). The figure here shows an unusually large increase that has far outpaced that of average inflation. Combine this information with the equally troubling information released by Bloomberg stating “college tuition and fees have increased 1,120 percent since records began in 1978” and a serious financial problem for students emerges(Huffington Post, 2012). One thing should be clear given these statistics: something must be done to help lessen the financial burden being placed on today’s students. Considering the implications of these two figures, the University of Delaware should attempt to remedy the increasing cost of textbooks as soon as possible before they overwhelm students any more than they already have. In order to help reduce these runaway costs, this institution should pursue a policy similar to those high schools and elementary schools practice, namely a sort of loan program.
Between the fiscal years of 2008 and 2014 the cost of college tuition has skyrocketed in multiple states. Arizona saw an increase of 80.6%, Nevada with 44%, California with 62.4% Minnesota with 19.5%, and Maryland with the lowest of 3.1%. The United States average increase of college tuition for the fiscal years of 2008 and 2014 was 28.2%. The reason for the increases in college tuition come from the recessions the country has experienced. When there is a recession, the funding is cut for the universities causing them to either cut services or raise tuition prices. Tyler Durden, author of “The Shocking Increase of College Tuition By State” explains, “Today, tuition revenue now outweighs government funding for higher education in 23 states-asking students and families to shoulder higher education costs by a ratio of at least 2-to-1”. Basically, college students are making up for the education cuts with their tuition (Durden).
Arnett, T., & General Education Board. (1939). Trends in tuition fees in state and endowed
This trend contains the first major problem with the high costs of tuition. The increased spending begs the question, where does the extra money go? Revealing its allocation is central to determining the fairness of the increases. Over the past 30 years according to the publication, Costs up, Results Down in Higher Education, students have a watched tuition rise “more than 220 percent”, yet most of this extra spending is being “allocated on non-instructional activities” (58). Schools are more concerned with providing an appealing and competitive atmosphere than truly fostering education. The most important budget share of institutional spending is the share for actual education as it relates to the students. Shown in figure eight of Donna M. Desrochers and Jane V. Wellman’s report, Trends in College Spending 1999-2009. Where Does the Money Come from? Where Does It Go? What Does It Buy? A Report of the Delta Cost Project, total spending has grown at a much faster rate than spending on education alone (24). This means that a portion of the extra dollars you pay is being allocated for the institution’s private use. Beyond increased spending for non-instructional activities misallocation continues deeper into the share for education related
When thinking about college the same fear is established in just about every student’s mind. How am I going to pay for college? With an increase in college tuition in the past ten years, that question has become more frequent. Whether it is a private or public institution, the price is still no pocket change and how to pay for it has become harder and harder to accomplish. In today’s society, the average person can not get as far as they’d hope without a college education. With that accomplishment of receiving a college education, comes the dreaded loans that some students have and pass on to their children.
During my first week in college, everything about college was unknown to me. From what to expect in college, to the adaptation of the college environment, the college experience seemed nerve wrecking at first. However, the lessons from Freshman Seminar proved to be beneficial towards my life in college. Because of this class, not only have I learned about the college experience, I’ve also adapted learning techniques that have greatly improved my performance in my other classes, as well as being a successful college student. Also, Freshman Seminar has escalated my confidence level toward college. The Freshman Seminar 101 Experience has implemented a very precious memory that will stay with me throughout my college experience.
The price of college has risen over the years. In 2013-2014, the percentage in tuition and fee prices for out-of-state students increased 3.1%, slightly higher than state residents, at a four-year institution. The dollar gap between the two prices increased from $12,887 to $13,310 (Colle...
First of all, comparing the price tags of going to Penn State and other similar colleges will provide a basic sense on how expensive Penn State is relative to others. For Midwestern public universities that have nearly the same sizes in enrollment compared to Penn State, the tuition of Penn State is by far more expensive than those Midwestern colleges. Let’s consider Michigan State University, with an enrollment of nearly 35,000. The in-state tuition for Michigan State University is about $6,700, while the out-of-state tuition is close to $16,700 (Michigan 2004). On the other hand, Penn State—University Park, has a student population of nearly 34,000 students. The in-state and out-of-state tuitions at Penn State are at least $2,000 more than the tuitions for attending Michigan State (PSU Registrar 2004). Penn State’s annual tuition is 30% more expensive than some public universities in the Midwest. One may argue that the difference in tuition is due to the location of the universities. This is not true at all, and I will provide evidence that will show that there is a weak or no correlation between the public university’s location and the tuition rate.