Tuesday Siesta And The Stolen Party: A Literary Analysis

1058 Words3 Pages

Being a full-time mother is one of the highest salaried jobs in my field, since the payment is pure love (Vermont 2014). “Tuesday Siesta” by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and “The Stolen Party” by Liliana Heker share many similarities and differences. Both short stories write about mothers who are struggling financially. Both mother characters in the stories were faced with a difficult circumstance, however, they each dealt with it in different ways. Lastly, the mothers in the short stories were portrayed differently. The mother in “Tuesday Siesta” was soft spoken and gentle whereas the mother in “The Stolen Party” was more abrupt, harsh and unrefined. In the short stories, “Tuesday Siesta” and “The Stolen Party”, both authors portray two less fortunate …show more content…

The mother from “Tuesday Siesta” just lost her son and had gone with her daughter to the priest’s house to go visit her son’s grave… ““He’s the thief who was killed here last week”, said the woman in the same tone voice, “I am his mother”” (Marquez 374). He was a thief and was killed by an old widow, named Rebecca, who was terrified and fired gun shots when she heard someone in the front of her house. She accepts the fact that he was a thief because it pains her less than when he was a boxer. The mother from the other story, “The Stolen Party” is also confronted by a difficult situation. Rosaura’s mother was concerned that her daughter would be used/treated as a maid, instead of being treated like every other guest. Her daughter is separated from the rest of the people at the party because she is not as wealthy and she is only the maid’s daughter. Rosaura being an ignorant child, refused to believe this at the beginning of the story and throughout the party. She finally comes to the realization that she cannot break through class stereotypes. “In her hand appeared two bills. You really and truly earned this, she said handing them over. Thank you for all your help” (Heker 32). The harsh reality is exposed to Rosaura when Luciana’s mother hands her money to thank her for all her help during the …show more content…

The old mother in “Tuesday Siesta” was soft spoken and gentle whereas the mother in “The Stolen Party” was more abrupt, harsh and unrefined. The mother in “Tuesday Siesta spoke to her daughter, the priest and his sister very calmly, even though there were times throughout the story that her tone of her words got more harsh but the tone and volume of her voice did not change. “It was a brief and self-assured reply, but her voice remained pleasant, full of undertones” (Marquez 373). During this situation, the mother was getting agitated that the priest had said for them to come back after three. Her and her daughter had spent so long traveling and she was not about to turn all the way back home, without visiting her sons grave. On the other hand, the mother from “The Stolen Party” was abrupt and harsh. Her daughter was invited to the birthday party of her mothers’ employer. She was a maid. The mother was none too impressed with her daughter wanting to go to the party because she knew her daughter would be treated different then everyone else. “… The problem with you, young lady, is that you like to fart higher than your ass” (Heker 27). It seemed the mother said what was on her mind, without thinking of how others perceive it or how it makes them

Open Document