Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of social media on purchase decision making or customers
Impact of social media on consumer behavior
Social media and its impact on consumer behaviour
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Humans desire the truth and nothing but the complete truth. Humans buy into anything if they want to believe it. Fake news and false information is nothing new, but with social media it has become more common and more dangerous. Before the 2016 presidential elections Russia began creating ‘troll farms’ intending to sway americans opinions and create havoc. Troll farming is affecting our society without people even realizing it and social media apps need to improve their efforts on banning these accounts. The effects of troll farms on people and social media is a greater issue than people realize. Mike Snider has been working for USA Today for 28 years. He has written hundreds of articles for the USA Today and a majority of them have been …show more content…
Yes, that would be very simple if Americans would take the time to fact check themselves. But, how many Americans are actually going to fact check something they read? Very little. Eileen Brown is a social business consultant who has been working with collaborative technologies for 20 years. Eileen creates the social business, energises communities and ignites social commerce and social CRM. She develops social business strategy, customer reach and online branding. Eileen understands that businesses need to be honest and should not want to spread false information to their customers. Eileen found several interesting statistics about media postings and fact-checking. “It discovered that 86 percent of Americans who read news articles on social media do not always fact-check the information they read.” (Brown). Only 14 percent of people actually fact check the information they read online, that number is to low to make a difference against fighting these organizations. “.. 61 percent [of people] who read articles on social media sites are likely to like, share, or comment on content shared by a friend.’, ‘ ...Millennials and Gen Z are social news junkies, using social media as their main source of news. They are about three-times more likely to trust most or all of the news from these alternative news sites compared with adults aged from 55 to 64. Thirty-five percent of Americans said that their lack of trust in mainstream media for credible news has caused them to seek alternative news sources online.” (Brown). People are at least realizing they are reading fake news, but how do they know the next online news site they go to is not spreading false information as well? Millennials are the biggest concern, in the 2020 elections they are going to vote and going to learn about these candidates somehow before
Another reason why people, especially publishers, might find fake news appealing is from the amount of money they can earn from something that is not true. In the first article, it states, “When you click or share a story, the person or company that created the site gets money. This money comes from advertisers who pay sites based on the number of views their ads get. That’s the point of shocking or outrageous headlines: to get you to click,” (Lewis, 11). This means that, for every outrageous news story that is clicked on, whether it is real or fake, it gets a lot of money. Anyone can become rich from starting a fake news business, and that is what many find appealing about the business. All in all, whether it be the thrill of telling a story, or doing it for the money, there are always people who are interested in the fake news
Although author Danielle Keats Citron’s article “Free Speech Does Not Protect Cyber harassment” and author Vyshali Manivannan’s article “When “Trolling” Becomes an Umbrella Term” both are about “Trolling” on the internet. They both have different point of views but tie together very nicely. Author Manivannan describes trolling as “a set of diverse behaviors—everything from harmful efforts to destroy a target’s reputation to harmless pranks and serious political activity” which to me seems a bit too much of a technical but well explained term in my eyes.
As people look back at history they will see that little posts on Facebook and Twitter can be all lies. It’s not hard to make a post, all you have to do is create something that will draw people's attention. Even if you have to smudge the truth a little. When people find something on the internet they automatically think that it’s true, but in reality news stations sometimes have to “spice” up stories to make people watch their station. This is how the truth is sometimes expendable because the little change of words in a quote could change how people view the story. This is why people need to check who they are watching and shouldn’t take every word said is true unless heard by multiple reliable sources. As we as human beings move on, people need to remember that everything on the internet, new, and social media is true. If you want to know if the piece of information is true look it up, if it is there should be a couple reliable sources that have almost identical information. If you can’t find the same information then it is obviously fake. To help create a better democracy always remember to double check your sources and always check the world around you, because you never know what is true or
In the recent years, technology has changed the world. We have discovered new diseases and viruses, and found cures and remedies for them. We have made technology to go into and research outer space and its resources. We have even made devices that can fit in a normal persons pocket and can text, call, post, tweet, or message anyone from anywhere! But this recent boom in technology has created a new battlefront for bullies. Now, Bullies can post or comment hateful words or embarrassing photos on social media. The effects are much worse than most forms of bullying , because the amount of people who can see it is so much more online than in person. Now, bullies can argue against prosecution by saying that they have the right of the first amendment. Cyberbullies should be punished for cyberbullying because it
Granted, in the present day world, information is easily available to anyone who wants it. Smart phones and computers are able to search through infinite sources to find what they are programed to do. Information is available at people’s fingertips to know the latest news in the world. Although information can be retrieved quickly and plentifully by technology, this information is not always accurate. Technology is unable to be programmed to find truthful sources, or find facts that have any truth at all. Technology looks for any and all information that is
Barely a day goes by without social media users trolling each other and this has become a trend in such a way that the users always look forward to another troll as long as it does not target them. On social media, people like to troll others but are offended when other people troll them. Trolling not only affects those that are trolled psychologically but also affect their wellbeing. Moreover, social media users troll other because for unnecessary reasons such as their looks or
He claims that “fact checking must be done as a public good,” though it continues to remain futile to post-truthers and alt-posters: an audience who only readily consume information that reinforces their predetermined thoughts and opinions. The author emphasizes the importance of fact checking and its relevance and purposefulness to be shared and documented. As well, Bergel (2017) references a quote by Moynihan to set up his next argument: “everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts,” and counters that alt-posters believe they are entitled to their own facts. The author explains the theatrics of fake news as weaponized and overused by pervasive politics. Bergel (2017) concludes with a call to action: “we must get more creative with information technology and online delivery systems” to develop and facilitate an accessible process to seek true
In the book, Trust Me I’m Lying Confessions of a Media Manipulator, there was a certain element of deceit throughout, the narrative, where a manipulator was able to produce a good living by means of lying, thus ultimately fooling themselves and the world around them. Ryan Holiday explains in his book, “Many have no idea of how much their general worldview is influenced by the way news is generated online” (13). In order to gain the readers attention, bloggers on the internet follow no set of regulations, adhere to no limits, and unfortunately, write anything and everything in order to gain attention, because in the world of media, large amounts of publicity can mean the difference between success and failure. Media manipulators go to heavy extremes in order to get random victims to click on their articles. Consequently, everything ever written on the internet could potentially be a lie, which forces the question what to believe? Upon examining a blog article written by Rebecca Rose, “Female Pilot Gets Sexist Note from Sexist Passenger,” this is evidence just how untrustworthy and deceitful the internet can be. When researching articles on the internet, people must
Sometimes when a person has such a strong desire for an idea or theory to be true she end up convincing herself that it is and that’s how a part of biased and fake new arise. After that person publish those fake news, another person who shares the same perspective will automatically adopt and accept that information and correspondingly reject all other facts that contradict what they believe in. And
In an age where TV views is decreasing and people not reading the newspaper, most of the population now gets their news from a different source the internet. In more specific terms Social Media, there are many social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Most of the population uses these social media platforms for work or for entertainment, but the matter of the problem is that since it is easy for news to get spread around in social media so would fake news. Fake news has been around for what it seems like forever. Social Media helps fake news spread because of how any user of a platform can just upload and share a fake news article without having any real source of material or having no type of credibility.
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...
Social media is a revolutionary way to connect with friends and family through a single app, much like Facebook. Also allowing the public to be more informed on current events, whether that is an issue in today’s society, all the way to a heartwarming story or a funny video. This sounds amazing and the fact that this type of news outlet is practically new. An issue arises that involves “fake news” and with that comes many opinions on what to do about it. I believe that people browsing these platforms should have a little bit of skepticism behind each story and if the topic truly intrigues someone then they should look into the topic on a reliable resource before passing on the authors misinformation.
Naturally, journalism would spill over to the Internet and as social media websites such as Twitter and Facebook grew in popularity, so did regular citizens involvement with sharing news. The argument can be made that the explosion of social media journalism was due to frustration from the lack of coverage of news that mattered to society. For example, the lack of subjective coverage of Michael Brown 's death helped with the creation of #BlackLivesMatter and spread of news related to African-American’s and other minorities across the country. After all, journalism is supposed to be a public forum. Millions of people on Twitter share their thoughts and opinions on several topics, furthering the conversation and to some degree challenging society. Things such as “Moments” on Twitter provide us with direct links and summaries to the world’s most important stories and encourage a conversation. According to journalism.org, 63% of users on Twitter and Facebook get their news from these websites. Even more eye opening is that 59% of users on Twitter keep up to date with news stories via Twitter while they are in the process of happening.[3] The rise of social media related journalism has caused some issues however. “Inevitably, as citizen involvement grows, more of our media culture is concerned with talking about news, instead of focusing on original reporting and the vetting of it.”[4] Because the general public has the ability to post as they wish and pass it off as news, it has affected the accuracy of many reports. Many stories lack reputable sources but are shared between millions as an accurate and true story. There are several websites designed to spread inaccurate information. The website www.fakenewswatch.com exists to inform people of these sites in order to avoid mishaps. Recently a Connecticut mom went viral for being involved in an online hoax
Social media has changed the way people communicate with each other and in turn, has affected our ability to empathize in both negative and positive ways. One of the most harmful consequences is the rise of cyber-bullying, which can be found from a hateful Facebook post by a classmate to anonymous trolling in the comments sections of websites. Some argue that social media is a breeding ground for this type of behavior while others say it would still take place even if you removed the medium.
...stence depends upon continued success in furnishing readers and listeners with a wide range of facts,” said reporter Julian Adams. By the public depending on media for information, they are making the media money. Buying newspapers and magazines are compensating those companies. Listening to your local radio station and watching your local news channel is compensating those companies. “Staging (fabrication) or deliberate distortion of news is against public interest,” said writer William B. Ray. Society believes in media and the media believes in the society. So let the society know the real data and what’s important. Knowing what’s important captures the public’s interest rather than knowing what’s fake. Falsifying News is legal meaning the media is allowed to lie to the public. Everyone has their own views on this topic but either way lying to the society is wrong.