Transparency Paradox Case Study

1883 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: network neutrality essay

QUESTION 1
Helen Nissenbaum writes about the transparency paradox. What does she mean by it? And how is it relevant with respect to the Internet? What do you think the correct solution to the transparency paradox is and why?
Transparency paradox can be explained as a theory that basically states that owing to rapid development in technology and innovation. There has been a ubiquitous usage of digital tools. Each of these tools collects some information about a person. Consent to use the information, transparency and individual privacy has become an issue (Bernstein, 2012). This new kind of developments has skewed the concepts of privacy and transparency. This has made interpretation of all the concepts related to privacy an issue. This has …show more content…

What is the source of their disagreement? Explain not what they disagree about, but why they disagree. Who is right? And why?
The debate of Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo is about whether keep network neutrality. The Network Neutrality is about principle “non-discriminatory interconnection”, it refers that all users of the network should be received equal treatment. The Tim Wu is a supporter of network neutrality, he states the internet more like a highway rather than a fast food restaurant, so it should remain neutral. Because basic on the transportation and communication network should within scope of public interest, not on the individual difference. But the Christopher Yoo as a opponent thinks even if deviations the network neutrality there will not be necessarily damage users and innovation and then he suggests an alternative approach called “network …show more content…

Because in the internet people talk simply by the language based on the typewriting and voice chat, nevertheless it is not always easy to form the close bonds of friendship, people can not stay together and express their affection with their physical behaviour (e.g, body language). I think they are right because i was try to make friends from internet but I feel it is not good for a real friendships. In the real world I have a best girlfriend we can go shopping, watching movies, go traveling together, we laughing and gossiping at each other. We enjoy this time. Although we often quarrel, we can reconciled after quarrel because a smile, hug or joke and we never hate each other. However I had another friend, we knew each other from the Facebook, in the beginning we were attracted each other because we had the same hobbies, we love go climbing but pity we can not go together. And when we disagree we can not explain in time. Thereby we can not avoid misunderstanding and I think it is important for the relationship. So I agree with the Cocking and Matthew the real friendships it impossible on the internet.
And in the internet people usually show their good side, thereby

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Friending: The Changing Definition Of Friendship

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    Sadly, people are becoming socially awkward as “social media behavior involves communicating with many remote persons even when one may be physically alone,” making it incapable of having a true physical friendship (Vatel 2). For some, communication does not exist without the shield of a laptop computer and an internet connection. To truly know someone is not the brief exchange of a few instant messages that may or may not be truthful or sincere. Today, engaging in a social outing, coming together for a casual gathering or even a simple brunch to get to know one another has become taboo. As a result, earning truth to the statement, “it’s possible to build friendship online, but more often we need to integrate online engagement with offline interaction,” pointing to the importance of social assembly, given the fact that the benefit of face to face contact has been casually discarded (Xinran 209). Unfortunately, the modern attraction in being a friend today has become the ability to add or delete friends with the right click of a notion and without any thought of

    Read More

  • Net Neutrality

    1150 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although the net neutrality debate didn’t come into the spot light so long ago, it has sparked controversy in the communications world. This concept provides a positive impact to the consumers, competition and network owners/internet service providers. It broadens the aspect of equality, which the open Internet was first based on. The profound effects on the aforementioned players provide a supported purpose to regulate the notion of net neutrality.

    Read More

  • What is a transparent epistemic rule? How does it relate to privileged access?

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    Privileged access and epistemic transparency are very interesting ideas. They deal with the idea of individual truths. These truths focus mainly on things that can be true to you, but false to others and can encompass things that may momentarily appear true, yet are generally false. The question philosophers have focused on is as follows: How can something as solid as a “truth” vary from person to person, and mind to mind? The general idea behind this topic is, as discussed in class, that some mental states belong to an individual because only that individual can access them. One can hypothesize others mental states based on how they act, however one can not really know the true state of mind.

    Read More

  • Friendship Over The Internet: The Use Of Friendship Over The Internet

    846 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adam Briggle also talks about how on online friendships in his article Real friends: how the internet can foster friendship. He states that we can sell our best quality and hide or not show the weaker side of ourselves, whereas in face-face friendships we may not be able to hide those negative traits about ourselves and they may just come out without our knowledge. This being said gives us or the internet user full control on how and what they what to share with other individuals online. (Briggle, 2008, p.

    Read More

  • Online Data Tracking: An Invasion of Privacy?

    1364 Words  | 3 Pages

    The personal connection Americans have with their phones, tablets, and computers; and the rising popularity of online shopping and social websites due to the massive influence the social media has on Americans, it is clear why this generation is called the Information Age, also known as Digital Age. With the Internet being a huge part of our lives, more and more personal data is being made available, because of our ever-increasing dependence and use of the Internet on our phones, tablets, and computers. Some corporations such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook; governments, and other third parties have been tracking our internet use and acquiring data in order to provide personalized services and advertisements for consumers. Many American such as Nicholas Carr who wrote the article “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty, With Real Dangers,” Anil Dagar who wrote the article “Internet, Economy and Privacy,” and Grace Nasri who wrote the article “Why Consumers are Increasingly Willing to Trade Data for Personalization,” believe that the continuing loss of personal privacy may lead us as a society to devalue the concept of privacy and see privacy as outdated and unimportant. Privacy is dead and corporations, governments, and third parties murdered it for their personal gain not for the interest of the public as they claim. There are more disadvantages than advantages on letting corporations, governments, and third parties track and acquire data to personalized services and advertisements for us.

    Read More

  • Net Neutrality: The Future of the Internet?

    1925 Words  | 4 Pages

    Network neutrality is best defined as a network design principle. The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally. This allows the network to carry every form of information and support every kind of application. The principle suggests that information networks are often more valuable when they are less specialized – when they are a platform for multiple uses, present and future. (Wu)

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Why Privacy Matters Even If You Have Nothing To Hide

    496 Words  | 1 Pages

    The word “privacy” has a different meaning in our society than it did in previous times. You can put on Privacy settings on Facebook, twitter, or any social media sights, however, nothing is truly personal and without others being able to view your information. You can get to know a person’s personal life simply by typing in their name in google. In the chronicle review, “Why Privacy Matters Even if You Have ‘Nothing to Hide,'" published on May 15th 2011, Professor Daniel J. Solove argues that the issue of privacy affects more than just individuals hiding a wrong. The nothing-to-hide argument pervades discussions about privacy. Solove starts talking about this argument right away in the article and discusses how the nothing-to-hide

    Read More

  • Transparency, Transparencycy And Privacy

    895 Words  | 2 Pages

    The general meaning of transparency implies openness, or see-through, which is then applied to socio-politics with regards to accessing information and governmental records to better enable knowledge sharing and accountability. Finel and Lord (1999) define transparency as legal, political, and institutional structures that make internal information about a government and society available to actors both inside and outside of domestic political systems. According to Ann Florini (1998; 2002; 2008), transparency is the opposite of secrecy and a choice encouraged by changing attitudes about what constitutes appropriate behavior. Gupta (2008) and Mason (2008) further highlight the complex, contested, and important nature of transparency as a tool

    Read More

  • Privacy vs. Security

    1260 Words  | 3 Pages

    Ever since day one, people have been developing and creating all sorts of new methods and machines to help better everyday life in one way or another. Who can forget the invention of the ever-wondrous telephone? And we can’t forget how innovative and life-changing computers have been. However, while all machines have their positive uses, there can also be many negatives depending on how one uses said machines, wiretapping in on phone conversations, using spyware to quietly survey every keystroke and click one makes, and many other methods of unwanted snooping have arisen. As a result, laws have been made to make sure these negative uses are not taken advantage of by anyone. But because of how often technology changes, how can it be known that the laws made so long ago can still uphold proper justice? With the laws that are in place now, it’s a constant struggle to balance security with privacy. Privacy laws should be revised completely in order to create a better happy medium between security and privacy. A common misconception of most is that a happy medium of privacy and security is impossible to achieve. However, as well-said by Daniel Solove, “Protecting privacy doesn’t need to mean scuttling a security measure. Most people concerned about the privacy implications of government surveillance aren’t arguing for no[sic] surveillance and absolute privacy. They’d be fine giving up some privacy as long as appropriate controls, limitations, oversight and accountability mechanisms were in place.”(“5 Myths about Privacy”)

    Read More

  • Charlotte Temple, by Susanna Rowson

    2431 Words  | 5 Pages

    Holtzman, D. Privacy Lost: How Technology is Endangering your Privacy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006. Print.

    Read More

  • Indiviual Privacy vs National Security

    1175 Words  | 3 Pages

    James Madison once said “Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” To gain a better understanding of a society, one must gain knowledge of the needs and wants the citizens’ demand from the country’s representatives. In every country the needed to protect its citizens is the same. In some nations, security is a higher priority which causes sacrifices to be made to obtain an indefinite protection against all rivals. In Peter Singer’s essay titled “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” he states that there is a way that governments can collect information by using technology; to allow more ‘openness’ and exposure as an increase of unknown surveillance that the public is not aware of. Singer’s essay also talks about how also with the rise of secrecy within politics; organizations such as ‘WikiLeaks’ and ‘Anonymous’ reveal to the world what is really going on within their privacy. Benefits come from both sides in a world where surveillance exists to the highest priority with or without privacy.

    Read More

  • Privacy Essay

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    As technology as advanced, so has our society. We are able to accomplish many tasks much easier, faster, and in effective ways. However, if looked at the harmful impact it has had on the society, one can realize that these are severe and really negative. One of the main concerns is privacy rights. Many people want that their information and personal data be kept in secrecy, however with today’s technology, privacy is almost impossible. No matter how hard one tries, information being leaked through technological advancements have become more and more common. With personal information being leaked, one does not know exactly how the information will be used, which validates the statement that privacy rights have been diminishing and should be brought to concern. Many people do not realize that their information is being used by third-parties and to consumer companies. In conclusion, technology has had a significant effect on privacy

    Read More

  • Essay On Transparency

    1785 Words  | 4 Pages

    Transparency has broad and narrow meaning. A broader transparency definiton implies openness, communication, and accountabilitywhich are not precise enough to be applied in concrete cases. .Transparency does not only cover availibility of informations but also requires them to be clear and understandable. This latter point distinguishes ‘transparency’ from ‘openness’ Also, transparency has a dimension with regard to access to documents. İt is a part of the freedom of expression in the sense that people have right to receive information.Therefore, right to access to information is recognised as a human right. EU Charter of Fundemantal Rights( thereafter EU Charter) recognises access to documents as a fundamental right .”This right is both a fundamental right of individuals and an institutional principle. “ Article 8 of the Charter codifies right to access to personal data, article 41(2) gives the parties in administratif procedures right to access to file and article 42 codifies it with regard to documents of EU institutions. On the other hand , right to access to informations is not an absolute right. Hovewer, exceptions should be interpreted restrictively in order not to undermine the purpose of the right.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Online Friends

    736 Words  | 2 Pages

    Online friends are not really too different from real friends. For some people, friendship is all about affiliation, intimacy, or close relationships. It is

    Read More

  • Essay On Transparency

    1017 Words  | 3 Pages

    Transparency- In politics, transparency is used as a means of holding public officials accountable and fighting corruption. When a government's meetings are open to the press and the public, its budgets may be reviewed by anyone, and its laws and decisions are open to discussion, it is seen as transparent, and there is less opportunity for the authorities to abuse the system for their own interests. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_(behavior))

    Read More

More about Transparency Paradox Case Study

Open Document