The last of the dichotomies revolves around a person’s manner of dealing with the outer world. I belong to the Judging category as I prefer living in a planned, orderly way in contrast to the perceiving type which includes the preference for spontaneity and flexibility (Introduction to Type, 10). I have multiple to-do lists on my planner, phone, bulletin board, and sticky notes on random places. During weekends, I enjoy writing my activities for the week and numbering my obligations according to priority. In spite of this, I do not completely believe that my preference for Judging is 100%, as indicated in the results of the MBTI test. When I am writing fiction, I do not construct quotas to be achieved. Inspiration impulsively arrives at my door and my ability to generate plots and ideas are largely dependent on my mood and surroundings. The same is true for math—I do not refer to books when I am in the process of solving problems. I often change course almost instantaneously when I observe that a certain approach is not working. The separate preferences for Introversion, Intuition, Thinking, and Judging are not as excellent at describing my personality as they are when put together. One of the primary labels of society for INTJs are the Strategists or the Scientists who constantly improve upon things (Heiss, par. 2). In my case, I always introspect and search for abilities that may be good, but can be cultivated to morph into something more. It astounds me how extensive the effect of my anxiety is on my personality. Even though I have treaded my way through the multitudes of people that live in the same society as I do, I am still internally drowning in the need to uphold my image. There will always be room for improvement, no ma... ... middle of paper ... ... Isabel. Introduction to Type. 6th Ed. Mountain View: CPP, Inc. Print. DTiberio, John, and Allen Hammer. Introduction to Type in College. Mountain View: CPP, Inc., 1993. Print Personality test based on C. Jung and I. Briggs Myers type theory. 2013. HumanMetrics. Web. February 5 2014. “Introverted Intuitive Thinking Judging.” Marina Margaret Heiss. n.p., 17 Oct 2009. Web. 5 February 2014. “INTJ Mastermind.” OddlyDevelopedTypes. n.p. n.d. Web. 5 February 2014. “INTJ Personal Growth.” Personality Page. n.p. n.d. Web. 26 February 2014. “What is Personality?” Personality & Spirituality. n.p., 18 Aug 2009. Web. 6 March 2014.
2. Jung, C.G. & Briggs-Meyers, I. (1998-2017). Jung Typology Test, Humanmetrics Incorporated, Retrieved from http://www.humanmetrics.com/
There are many personality tools available to anyone wishing to increase their knowledge of the subject, but Carl Jung’s theories have been in practice since 1940 (Humanmetrics. 2013). His theories have had many opportunities to be disproved, but instead they have only been elaborated on. The 2013Humanmetrics - Jung Typology Test utilizes not only Jung’s theory, but it incorporates those of the Myers and Briggs team for an improved holistic insight. The personality test and subsequent results consist of 8 possible preferences (6 from Jung and 2 additions from Myers Briggs) traits comprising a total of 16 possible combinations (Humanmetrics. 2013). My personality tests results reveal that I am what is called an Extravert, iNtuitive, Feeling, and Judging
People cannot simply overlook how individual behaviors influence organizational behaviors. Taking the Humanmetrics Jung Typology Test and the McGraw-Hill Connect Self-Assessment (2017) allow individuals to learn more about their personality type and characteristics in which God has gifted and equipped us to be in order to serve His purpose in whatever organization He has placed us in.
Personality typing can be very enlightening when it comes to recognizing one’s own growth and self-development. While there are sixteen personality types that are used in the personality assessment, based on the extensive research of Carl Jung, Briggs and Myers, we are given one type based on how we perceive things and make decisions. The Jung Typology Test revealed that I have a personality type that is E (Extraverted), N (intuitive), F (feeling), and J (judging). When looking at the strength of the preferences I have a slight preference of Extraversion over Introversion by 6%. I was able to quickly relate to that piece of information, depending on the setting, surrounding people, and the situation, I tend to go back and forth between being
According to Carl Jung’s typology theory each individual develops personal preferences which become the foundation for how they face life’s challenges and interact with others. Based on this knowledge Isabel Briggs Myers developed the Myers-Briggs Type indicator (MBTI). This test helps individuals identify and study their individual preference and those of others. After taking the Jung Typology Test, which is based on the MBTI, it was confirmed that my four dominate personality preferences are Introversion, iNtuition, Thinking and Judging. Each personality preference is discussed in detail including strengths and weaknesses. The combination of the four make me a INTJ of the world. This is also discussed in detail including strengths, weaknesses,
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) has recognized my profile as Introvert, Intuitive, Thinking and Judgment (INTJ). As an introvert, I can get nervous among other people. It does not pose a problem for an individual. On the other hand, in order to be an effective leader, it is important for me to keep a profound communicational relationship with my subordinates. Without proper communication skills, it is not possible to establish a functional relationship with my subordinates. This may jeopardize the success of any activity that we are involved in. The introvert part is perhaps the major barrier which may keep me away from being an effective leader.
Personality test based on C. Jung and I. Briggs Myers type theory. (n.d.). Personality test based on C. Jung and I. Briggs Myers type theory. Retrieved May 21, 2014, from http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
In the next five subheadings, I will explain what it means for me to have a personality type that strongly prefers extraversion, sensing, feeling, and judging. I will also discuss the Sensing-Judging Temperament and how it explains my behaviors. "Good introductory paragraph
Much of Jung’s work, controversial as it was, is still in use or extended upon to some degree today. Katherine Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers developed the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator based on Jung’s categorization of the psyche. Through taking this test, one can be identified as being one out of sixteen different categories such as ENFJ (extroverted feeling with intuiting) or ISTJ (introverted sensing with thinking). Jung’s Word Association test is also in wide use in the psychiatric field today.
The Keirsey Temperament Sorter II identified my temperament as artisan, and the classic temperament report identified me as an ISTP, or Introverted Sensing Thinking Perceiving. The description of my temperament was dead on with my view of myself, especially the more in depth classic temperament. My strengths include an excellent ability to apply logic and reason to solve problems or discover how things work, and being high;y practical and realistic, however I will not function well in regimented or structured environments, as I will become bored or feel stifled. This temperament profile also correlates to my learning style, as the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II results also mention that I learn best hands-on, and states that ISTP’s are a master of their physical environment.
This paper researches the typical traits of the INTJ personality type according to the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator. Additionally, I will be discussing the opposite personality of INTJ, type ESFP. I will detail two past experiences where my INTJ personality posed problems. This paper will also explore strategies that may benefit the INTJ personality type, myself included.
"Personality Test Based on C. Jung and I. Briggs Myers Type Theory."Personality Test Based on C. Jung and I. Briggs Myers Type Theory. Humanmetrics, 1998. Web. 11 June 2014. .
The five perspectives of personality, conscientiousness, openness, anxiousness, agreeableness and extraversion have some relation with intelligence, since intelligent people are likely to succeed in every situation they have encountered. Their relationship is not so deep that intelligence could be strictly linked to openness in some academic reports, though ratings in intelligence could have a over .3 percent predictability of openness. However, what makes intelligence a potential part of personality is that scientific investigation has shown that personality is also highly correlated to
Trait approach covers the big five personality traits: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience. These five traits have been identified as the most identifiable personality traits, even across cultures and societies. According to McCrae, Costa, and Busch’s (1986) study on personality system comprehensiveness, the big five personality model included the five traits most identified with by individuals asked to describe themselves and others. I found this segment of the class especially intriguing as it helped me not only learn so much about myself, but also take a deeper look into the personality of my family, peers, and even strangers. I am also more conscious of how I self-monitor my personality traits. For example, I am very much so an introverted person but at times I try to be extroverted based off the environment. In highly social environments, I consciously smile and try to talk to people because I want to be perceived in a favorable light, not actually because I feel the need to be sociable. In other words, I don’t want to be perceived as odd. I believe I developed this form of self-monitoring because when I am introverted at social events people will constantly ask me if I’m ok since I’m quiet, which makes me uncomfortable as they make me the focus. Being the center of attention makes me anxious, and therefore to prevent that I have developed being a fake-extrovert to avoid it. This exemplified how I apply self-monitoring to my everyday life. Trait approach gave me insight into how to identify vastly accepted personality traits, as well as, how each of these traits can be influenced and
Jerome S. B. , Goodnow J. J. and Austin G.A. (1967) Overview ( p.231-247):In A study of thinking . John Wiley and Sons Ltd, USA