Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of Trademarks
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of Trademarks
Today, the trade mark industry is a vital component of the whole structure of the advertising and marketing that is a key feature of the commercial science. Logos, catch-phrases, and images all fall within the ambit of the trade mark and from a valuable part of the goodwill of the business with which they are associated. In law, however, trade marks have in recent years been the subject of increasing controversy; this that culminated in an entirely new legislative framework, in the form of the Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA) .
In the UK the TMA 1994 is the primary source of trade mark law. However, the United Kingdom law has been heavily influenced in recent years by the development of both European Union Law and International Law. The TMA 1994 effectively implements the First EC Council Directive of 21st December 1988 to approximate the law of Member States relating to trade marks. In addition to this, Council Regulation (EC) No 40/941 of 20th December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ [1994] L11/1) laid the foundations for the ‘Community Trade Mark’ system, whereby an applicant may obtain a unitary trade mark covering the whole of the territory of the European Union by means of a single application to the Office for the Harmonisation of the International Market (OHIM).
It is obvious that trade mark law has to attain a balance between various potential competitors. Traders obtain trademarks in order to protect their image and reputation or their goods. However in a society based on free competition this allows others to compete on level terms within the same market. The rival trade at the very least would hope that the monopoly conferred by the grant of a trade mark is restricted to rational restrictions so as not to inhib...
... middle of paper ...
...nder which consumers interests are said to be intrinsically recognised, trademark law could truly benefit the consumer. This benefit is apparent when one considers that if the origin function supersedes the advertising function as that which the courts sought to protect, then parallel imports (goods which legitimately bear the mark of the trade mark proprietors and as such do not deceive the consumer as to their origin) would in some situations, be endorsed. Whilst it may be right that some protection is granted to manufacturer due to their investment in research and development of products, thereby justifying the needed for trademark laws and laws protecting tem, the question that must be addressed by the legislature is why this should be at the expense of the consumers interest. Notably, trademarks protect both consumers and investors, just on a different level.
The role of law reform has responded rather effectively to a certain extent in protecting the rights of consumers. This is evident in the legal responses introduced to address issues of credit, marketing innovation and technology. These law amendments has effectively increase the protection of the rights of consumers to a certain extent, however loopholes still exist. Due to the increasing range of goods and services continues to grow and the failure of existing laws, the role of law reform has been significant in protecting the rights of consumers. Consumer laws were created to prevent deceitful activities, or unfair business practices, as well as serving a protection for weaker parties who are unable to protect themselves. However, laws were later reformed to enable customers to transact with confidence and protect suppliers, consumers from inappropriate business conduct and to reflect changed community values and circumstances.
v. VIP Prods., LLC 666 F. Supp. 2d 974 (Mo., 2008) Anheuser-Busch makes a distinction between confusing and non-confusing parodies, the latter being protected as a parody. The important factors in the case were that the price point of the products was the same, they were directly competing goods and the survey showed that there was a level of confusion (30.3% were confused), in addition, consideration was placed on irreparable harm caused by the defendants use of the mark, the priority lay with the first to register the trademark, lastly the District Court considered public interest, i.e. whether the public was deceived. Similarly in Starbucks Corp v. Wolfe’s Borough Coffee Inc., 588 F3d 97 (2d Cir. 2007) the court distinguished Louis Vuitton S.A. v Haute Diggty Dog, LLC, 507 F.3d 252 (4th Cir. 2007) by holding that if (as in the Louis Vuitton case), the mark is used in non-competing goods, the defendant conveyed that it was not the source of the plaintiffs product and if the actual use of the mark does not impair the distinctiveness of the plaintiff’s mark there may be an argument in favor of the defendant, however, if the defendant’s humor is not conveyed to the public, and does not increase the public identification of the plaintiff’s mark with its mark it will fail to establish
This essay will examine key aspects of the recent implementation of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) 2011, which is the largest overhaul in Consumer Law in Australia in the past twenty five years. The ACL replaces 20 existing State and Territory laws into one national law , the legislation was enacted in two main parts as Schedule 2 of the renamed Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (TPA) - Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) . Aforementioned this essay it will outline the key benefits of the implementation of the act. Furthermore it will critique the Act, whilst exploring the objectives of the legislation.
Define and explain the following: copyrights, trademarks, and patents. Compare the three and provide an example of each. This paper will be non-graded, but it is still highly recommended that you complete this assignment for increased practice and self-improvement.
In every given business, the name itself portrays different meanings. This serves as the reference point and sometimes the basis of customers on what to expect within the company. Since personality affects product image (Langmeyer & Shank, 1994), the presence of brand helps in the realization of this concept. Traditionally, brand is a symbolic manifestation of all the information connected with a company, product, or service (Nilson, 2003; Olin, 2003). A brand is typically composed of a name, logo, and other visual elements such as images, colors, and icons (Gillooley & Varley, 2001; Laforet & Saunders, 1994)). It is believed that a brand puts an impression to the consumer on what to expect to the product or service being offered (Mere, 1995). In other application, brand may be referred as trademark, which is legally appropriate term. The brand is the most powerful weapon in the market (LePla & Parker, 1999). Brands possess personality in which people associate their experience. Oftentimes, they are related to the core values the company executes.
The aim of this essay is to critically discuss how the law of passing off and trade mark law have common roots and therefore are, in many respects, similar. I will begin with a short brief history of trade mark law and the law of passing off. I move on to discuss the similarity between trade mark law and the law of passing off with reference to relevant case law and statutes. Although, passing off and trade mark law deal with overlapping factual situations, s 2(2) of the Trade Mark Act 1994 maintains passing off as a separate cause of action. When a trade mark is threatened by the actions of third parties the proprietor will bring an action for both passing off and trade mark infringement which both share many similarities. However, they are
In this essay I will describe an image taken from an advert and use visual methodological approach to analyse and depict the different set of meanings produced by this image. In order to explicate my ideas I will provide a brief outline of the picture. Then, I will describe a number of coded and non coded meanings and how the advert is employing a range of signifiers to communicate messages to the consumer and reinforce the brand identity. (Barthes 1972)
While there are lots of authors who are argued in favour of this codification since two centuries, practitioners and business in the English community had always been afraid about this idea. To understand the context of this debate, I will, first, briefly explain what do we generally mean by the term ‘codification’. Then, I’ll take few points about the origins of English commercial law and describe its modern definition. Finally, I will outline the main arguments why I am against the proposition of a commercial
Mark Hughes (2008). "Logos that became legends: Icons from the world of advertising". Retrieved March 27, 2008, from www.independent.co.uk/news/media/logos-that-became-legends-icons-from-the-world-of-advertising-768077
The World Intellectual Property Organization, Intellectual property is the ‘products of the mind: inventions, literary and artistic works, any symbols, names, images, and designs used in commerce’. Intellectual Properties such as Patents, designs, trademarks and copyrights are protected by laws .The US government offers different types of protection for these properties. The Lanham Act (15 U.S.C.A. section 1051 et seq) also known as the trademark act of 1946 provides protection for trademarks. A trademark is defined as a name, a word, a symbol, or device or any combination thereof, adopted and used by a manufacturer or merchant to identify his goods and distinguish them from those manufactured and sold by others. (Miaoulis 1978)
People move away from their extended families, and traditions can fade, which is why it is important to have a trademark that easily identifies your ...
“How Advertising Has Changed Over The Years.” Locker Gnome, Bradley Bradwell. 6 January 2008. Web. 4 October 2009.
In its simplest form, corporate identity is a function of design that includes the name of the organization, its logos, the interior of the buildings, and visual identification such as uniforms of the staff, vehicles and signage. For a long period, graphic designers have remained highly influential been hugely influential in two regards, in that they articulated the basic tenets of corporate identity formation and management and succeeded in keeping the subject on the agenda of senior managers. Currently, symbolism, or design, has assumed a greater role and has moved on from merely increasing organizational visibility, to a more serious position of communicating corporate strategy (Ollins, 1978). There were now three main types of visual identity such as Monolithic (single brand visual), Endorsed (parent brand endorsing a sub-brand) and Branded (a plethora
All humans are exposed to branding and marketing on a daily basis. Commercials, internet ads, t-shirts, television shows. In today’s fast moving society, we’re constantly bombarded by the marketing and branding practices of businesses. As a new business owner, it can be daunting to step from being the observer to a creator of marketing and branding.
The term 'branding' in modern marketing is generally originated in the agricultural practices of the medieval age. The farmers 'branded' their animals with the iron and then they were able to identify to whom a particular animal belonged. Artisans 'branded' their products, for example, expensive silver tableware. Smiths 'branded' their swords. The role of the brand is to identify products by the same way as for medieval farmers and for modern corporations as well.