Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the importance of budgeting
the role of budgeting and its potential limitations
the role of budgeting and its potential limitations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the importance of budgeting
Top-down budgeting is listed in Towards a Metatheory of Budgeting as a normative theory of budgeting. Normative theories are defined as complete theories of budgeting that incorporate the budget, appropriations, preparation, and decision events. Normative theories are not intended to describe what occurs in the budgeting process but prescribe considerations for future implementation as a best practice (Williams & Calabrese, 2011). However, with the evolution of organizational complexity, top-down budgeting has become a positive theory. Positive theories explain an observation of the budgeting process and attempt to analyze why that behavior exists as an aspect of organizational culture (Williams & Calabrese, 2011). Top-down budgeting is not a desired best practice and therefore not a normative theory, because the methodology does not include key stakeholders in decision making. Top-down budgeting is used as a way to save time, centralize decision making, and limit the amount of controls given to lower levels of the organization. As organizations become flatter and remove excessive layers of management to become more nimble, the centralization of budget decisions has evolved (George, 2012). The traditional top-down budgeting approach is dated. Under the category of positive theory, top-down budgeting is a descriptive theory that explains an aspect of the budgeting process. It is an observation of practice. In an evolved definition, decisions from leadership are not the end of a process. Instead, they are a factor considered in the decisions for a final budget and department goals.
Top-down budgeting is also explanatory, as there is a description to how and why the budgetary behavior exists. According to Business Knowledge Source, ...
... middle of paper ...
...g - An Instrument to Strengthen Budget Management* | ASIP Asociación Internacional de Presupuesto Público. Retrieved January 19, 2014, from http://www.asip.org.ar/en/content/top-down-budgeting-instrument-strengthen-budget-management
National Priorities Project. (n.d.). National Priorities Project. Retrieved February 27, 2014, from http://nationalpriorities.org/budget-basics/federal-budget-101/federal-budget-process/ Ryan, P. (2011, December 7). A Brief History of Budgeting in the Nation's Capital. The Federal
Budget Process. Retrieved February 25, 2014, from http://budget.house.gov/uploaded files/bphr
Kavanagh, S. C. (2011). Zero Base Budgeting Modern Experiences and Current Perspectives.
Chicago, Illinois: Government Finance Officers Association.
Williams, D., & Calabrese, T. (2013). Towards a Metatheory of Budgeting. Economists
International , 1, 178-207.
I attended the Saturday Lab 1 session discussing the Denison Specialty Hospital case study. In our session, we had a through discussion into the different budget terminology. I learned about the difference between accrual and cash accounting methods, which is based on the timing of when the revenue and expenses are recognized. I also learned about responsibility centers as an organizational unit under the supervision of a manager, who is responsible for its activities and results. In addition, the manager is accountable for the budget of the department that they head. Therefore, a centralized form of management in developing the budget because it makes easier to because the information for the department budget is located
For government budgeting to be effective, the process that guides it must be an evolving one. As the government gets bigger, it will most likely destabilize the existing method. Therefore, it must change to keep pace with the demands and growth of the country. The process must be capable of handling the complexity of our nation and its multifaceted needs so it will always need revisions and restructuring to face these new challenges. Its ultimate goal must be to reinforce the government and strengthen the country.
In reasoning the use of a bottom up budgeting is that they didn’t want to base their budget on predictable goals and revenues but they thought it was more efficiently to base it in previous budgets. So base on their ordering cycle, the company was concentrated into three steps:
What is your role in development of the budget? What percentage of its development is at your discretion?
(Cronkhite, 2013) All organization requires specific planning and a clear understanding of the organization object. (McHatton, Bradshaw, Gallagher, & Reeves, 2011) With the budgeting which ensures that the funds necessary to carry out the organizational activities and once the budget is approve operational activities are conducted within the approved plan. (Cronkhite, 2013) The Capital budget contains large items since as location or a new building. (Cronkhite, 2013) This type of budgeting is done until the organization or project is complete. (Cronkhite, 2013) Line item budget is those items that are needed yearly in order to the organization to operate. (Cronkhite, 2013) This includes employee salaries all the way down to office basic stationery. (Cronkhite, 2013) The budgeting process is not something that is done once a year; it is a continual process of regular review and in some case possible for revision. (Cronkhite, 2013) In some case a zero based budgeting comes into play. This type of budgeting is also known as the “died of its own weight”. (Cronkhite, 2013) This is only done if there is a reduction in the organization by at 5%, 10% or 20% on how the essential programs would continue to function. (Cronkhite,
Top-down budgeting is the preferred method of budgeting for government agencies and many organizations (Ljungham). The methodology of top-down budgeting is described as “dominated by top members of the executive branch and the legislative branch” (Williams & Calabrese, 2011, 178). The methodology entrusts top members to make annual budgeting decisions for their organizations. In many instances, top members also use this time to set annual program or department goals and targets. Top members make these decisions without solicitation of input from bottom levels of an organization. This can result in operational and logistical constraints in the lower levels of an organization when plans are implemented (Williams & Calabrese, 2011). Additionally, it can serve as a source of frustration for staff when uninformed budgeting decisions create consequences. This is particularly true when staff is tasked with making things work in the aftermath of budgeting decisions, despite having clear or attainable goals and budgets. Like all budgeting methodologies, there are benefits and difficulties.
Wildavsky, A., & Caiden, N. (2004). The new politics of the budgetary process (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson/Longman.
According to Hopwood, (1976, as cited in Parker and Kyj, 2006) sharing of information between superiors and subordinates are one of the main benefits of the budgeting process. Shields and Shields (1998, as cited in Parker and Kyj, 2006) argue that information sharing during the budgeting process between the superior and subordinate is of high importance because both the individual and the organization can potentially benefit from it. Survey results show (Parker and Kyj, 2006) that vertical information sharing plays a huge role in understanding the performance effects of organizational commitment and budget participation. Role ambiguity is the intervening variable between the relation organizational commitment and budget participation (Parker and Kyj, 2006). Vertical information sharing consists of upward information sharing and downward information sharing.
Participative Budgeting is the situation in which budgets are designed and set after input from subordinate managers, instead of merely being imposed. The idea behind this sort of budgeting is to assign responsibility to subordinate managers and place a form of personal ownership on the final budget. Nearly two decades of management accounting research has resulted in equivocal findings on the consequences and effects of participative budgeting (Lindquist 1995). Participative budgeting certainly has various advantages, these include the transferral of information from subordinate to superior increased job satisfaction for the subordinate, budgetary responsibility and goal congruence. Its disadvantages include budgetary slack and negative motivation, however it is the conditions in which participative budgeting takes place determines whether the budgeting process is successful. The conditions are dependent on various factors such as the level of participation, level of subordinate influence, the extent to which budgetary slack takes place, volatility, job related information, and the complexity of the budget.
Whatever type of budget we create, we need to take this fact into the consideration that the budget process is a multidimensional process. There are tools which enable us to make better financial decisions such as “financial statements, assessments of risk, time value of the money, macroeconomic
Line item budgeting categorizes various expenses and places them in list format on a document for budgetary purposes. This type of budgeting is considered the heartbeat of budgeting due to the systematic method by which it controls revenue and expenses, this is made evident when Tyer and Willand (1992), pointed out “Statutory or administrative controls could be imposed on the transfer of funds from one-line item to another, or between broad categories of expenditure.” According to Schick (1971), “line item budgets were attractive to legislative officials because they did not focus explicit attention on substantive policy issues or choices.”
A company's budget serves as a guideline in planning and committing costs in order to meet tactical and strategic goals. Tactical goals such as providing budgetary costs for daily operations, and strategic objectives that include R&D, production, marketing, and distribution are all part of the budgeting process. Serving as a guideline rather than being set in stone, the budget is a snapshot of manager's "best thinking at the time it is prepared." (Marshall, 2003, p.496) The budget is a method in which to reign-in discretionary spending, and will likely show variances between what costs have been anticipated and what costs are actually incurred.
Quantitative plans are called budgets. Budgets are prepared to impose cost controls on the activities of an organization (Chenhall, 1986).Budgets are then used to evaluate the performance of the management and budget itself is considered as a standard to evaluate the performance Solomon, 1956). The purpose of the budget is also to implement the strategy of the organization and communicate it to the employees of the organization Rickards (2006). The change in the external environment has led to the change in the budgeting approaches from the initial cash based budgets to the zerio based budgets (Bovaird, 2007).
Blocher et al (2013), added that at the end of an operating period, managers view the budget plan to interpret any variance between actual and budgeting expenditures and operating outcomes. Under certain circumstances, a firm uses a budget plan, to ensure accurate spending, monitoring costs, and to analyze a subunit’s accomplishment. For example, the government use these tactics when a fiscal year budget has not been approved; which is known as a continued resolution. The lawmakers allocate a portion of funds to sub-agencies in order to remain operational. However, the budget plan allows lawmakers to monitor costs, planning, spending and the sub-agency’s goals for accomplishments.
The national budget is the main instrument through which governments collect resources from the economy, in a sufficient and appropriate manner; and allocate and use those resources responsively, efficiently and effectively (Todorovic & Djordjevic, 2009). The work of public budget has increased extremely more complicated, abstruse and worrying (Hou, 2006, p.730).