Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the law of tort 1
Tort is a branch of private law that deals with civil wrong committed against an individual, including legal entities such as companies rather than the state. Tort law can be described as a body of obligations and remedies applied by courts in any civil proceeding to offer relieve to an individual who has just suffered emotional or physical harm as a result of the wrongful acts of others. In this case, the individual who suffers a personal injury is known as the plaintiff, while the person responsible for the infliction of the injury is referred to as tortfeasor or respondent. In essence, this law has many goals, one being that of assisting the injured to recover through either monetary compensation or even mental compensation in order to promote civility, discourage private retaliation and deter future wrongful actions.
However, there are three basic elements that must be established for every tort action. For instance, the plaintiff must prove that the offender was under a permissible duty to act in a certain manner. Second, the complainant must demonstrate that the respondent breached this duty by failing to conform to his/her behavior accordingly. Finally, the plaintiff must prove that he suffered injury or loss as a direct result of the defendant's breach. The gist of tort law is that an individual has certain interests which must be protected by law. This paper will be an in-depth analysis of various aspects of Tort law. Tortfeasors can incur legal punishments, including injunctions and monetary damages if the tort is successful.
Features of Tort law
A combination of basic law principles and legislative enactments is the backbone of the law of torts, and are not entirely dependent on upon an agreement between the parties ...
... middle of paper ...
...spects that identify tort's central concepts like wrongs, rights and redresses are indeed very essential in giving expression to certain moral or political principles. In contrast, non-instrumental theorists do not see tort law primarily as responding to a social problem.
Tort law reform Initiatives
In most instances, the injured is every so often compensated for as a result of a tortious act by insurance companies, especially if the injury was suffered as a result of a medical malpractice. This means that doctors may end up paying a lot of money in for of insurance premiums. This has actually resulted in several tort law reforms to conform to modern world of recovery from personal injuries. For instance, President George W. Bush advocated for a federal legislation during his time in office that would place a $2500 00 cap on noneconomic damages at the national level
Damages in the United States include two categories. Compensatory damages are intended to compensate for the plaintiff’s loss. Punitive damages, on the contrary, are meant to punish the defendant .The punitive damages exceed the plaintiff’s loss, to dissuade the defendant from any further wrongdoings. For instance, having a company pay significant punitive damages may encourage it to greater caution. Another difference between the two categories is the money involved. If the damages are compensatory, the money usually goes entirely to the plaintiff, but if they are punitive, part of the money goes to the law firm and part to the plaintiff.
Tort, one of the crucial subjects of study when analyzing common law jurisdictions. Tort, is an action which causes another person or party to suffer harm or loss []. The person who has committed a tortious act is called the tortfeasor while the person who suffered harm or loss from such act is called the injured party or the victim. Although crimes may be torts, torts may not be crimes [] simply because a tort may not have broken a law. In fact, one must understand that the key idea of tort is not to punish the tortfeasor(s) but rather to compensate the victim(s).
In conclusion, Fletcher’s paradigm provides another way to look at liability. In this paradigm, he is more concerned with the case itself than if it brings social utility. Fletcher also looks at the actions and risks that both parties pose on one another and uses this to determine liability.
...ulations in the U.S. judicial system is “most define the law as a system of principles and processes by which people in a society deal with disputes and problems, seeking to solve or settle them without resorting to force” (p. 15). Some situations cannot be rectified in a board meeting. However, negligence is in the category of objectives of tort law, it is also the most popular lawsuit pursued by patients against medical professionals against doctors and healthcare organizations (Bal, 2009). Objectives of Tort Law
Tort reformers believe that courts must reduce the ability of defendants’ liability in order to avoid economic decline. In the years to come, the proposals likely to generate the biggest dispute include malpractice and class-action reform, limits on noneconomic and punitive damages, and a legislative solution to asbestos legation (Rushmann, 2006). There are many lawsuits. But the frivolous lawsuits should not be taken seriously and not cost our courts and citizens time and/or money.
2. Compare and contrast tort and criminal law. What are some types of behavior that would be covered by both types of law? In criminal law, the indictment is by the legislature. Disciplines might be fines (paid to the administration) or the correctional facility. In tort law, the offended party who brings the claim is the individual who was specifically harmed and the discipline is normally installment of harms to the individual harmed. A few demonstrations of conduct that would be secured by both sorts of laws are whether some individual physically hit another person and intended to bring about damage on them that would
...tice and a tort reform would be necessary. However, as soon as a person becomes defenseless the tort reform has gone too far. The business world should never have an advantage over the public. They should always be equal and have the same opportunity to win and collect damages. In conclusion, tort reforms are necessary to the extent that the person and the corporation remain equal (Loomis).
What Is Tort Reform, Anyway? A User-Friendly Guide. 31 Oct. 2003. Web. 28 May 2010. .
William M. Landes and Richard A. Posner. The Economic Structure of Tort Law. Harvard University Press, 1987.
after suffering harm from the acts of the other party (Turner, 2013). A tort is a civil wrong
This is where the individuals exercise their rights to seek compensations for damages or injuries. Also this is a law that is not controlled by the judges based on previous things that had happen in the past.
Considerable effort has been expended in attempts to identify the purpose of the law of torts. However, the range of interests protected by the law of torts makes any search for a single aim underlying the law a difficult one. For example, actions for wrongful interference with goods or trespasses to land serve fundamentally different ends from an action seeking compensation for a personal injury. Nevertheless, following the research I have carried out the fundamental purpose of the law of torts is to achieve compensation and appeasement and to obtain deterrence and justice, in order to determine the conditions under which certain losses may be shifted to persons who created the risks which in some way led to the losses. In doing so, the law of torts attempts to balance the utility of a particular type of conduct against the harm it may cause. During the course of this essay I will discuss each function separately and I will investigate how each function achieves its individual resolution of a tort.
The U.S court system has numerous cases in it, they range from multi million dollar cases (including the bank crisis, or the car business for example) to less severe cases called torts. A tort is a legal term defined as “ A wrongful act that does not include breach of contract. This offense damages the injured parties property or reputation, leaving that party able to gain compensation.” (Dictionary.com) The book The King of Torts is about a man named Clay Carter. He has a stable job, it doesn’t pay as much as he wishes. He in the scheme of one week goes from making $100,000 a year to making $5,000,000 in one case. This is all because he filed something called a mass tort (also known as a class tort).
From the 1990s, the reports that cover the compensation cases increased dramatically in the mass media (Almond, 2004). There is a view that a huge number of tort cases in the ‘compensation culture’ are unjustified and unfair. In the mid-1990s, the term ‘compensation culture’ first appeared in a famous British newspaper (Levin, 1993). Actually, this is an extreme view, which will be criticized in this paper. This essay emphasizes the compensation culture is a myth (Morris, 2007). There are three reasons: Firstly, the data of the tort claims declined in recent years. Secondly, some victims do not receive the compensation or enough compensation that they deserve. Thirdly, the mass media and public organizations created the ‘compensation
Damages – if the other party cause’s drastic damages that cost the other party or affect it negatively than the other party can sue and take them to court of law, and the court may claim that the affected party may be paid and be taken back to its original position as it was