Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The processes involved in budgeting
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The processes involved in budgeting
Top-Down Budgeting Methodology Top-down budgeting is described as “dominated by top members of the executive branch and the legislative branch. Decisions made by these top ranked actors include such matters as targets for programs or departments. Lower ranked decisions are sharply constrained by these top down decisions. Top-down budgeting may seek to prevent unwanted proposals” (Williams & Calabrese, 2011). Top-down budgeting is widely-used in the government, but also in many organizations (Ljungham). Organizationally, top-down budgeting decision makers are top level executives or senior leaders which determine the budget for lower levels of the organization. As stated, the method commonly goes beyond budgeting to include setting of program and department goals and targets. In a government and an organization there is little, if any; input solicited or considered when budgeting decisions are made. This may result in operational and logistical constraints in the lower levels of government or organization when plans are implemented. Top-Down Benefits Top-down budgeting has benefits such as time efficiency, low utilization of staff and resources, considerations of political environments, and holistic organizational needs. Time efficiency is one of the benefits to top-down budgeting because executive or legislative branches, or upper levels of management, make all the decisions. This enables middle and lower levels of management and staff to focus on their primary duties within an organization. This results in lower cost and resource intensity because involving staff in the budgeting process may require staff to complete extensive investigation and analysis. As top-down budgets are created by the top decision makers, budgets may be ... ... middle of paper ... ...om http://blogs.hbr.org/2012/02/a-new-era-for-global-leadershi/ Implementation Guide for OMB Circular A-123. (n.d.). Implementation Guide. Retrieved January 31, 2014, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb Ljungman, G. (n.d.). Top-Down Budgeting - An Instrument to Strengthen Budget Management* | ASIP Asociación Internacional de Presupuesto Público. Top-Down Budgeting - An Instrument to Strengthen Budget Management* | ASIP Asociación Internacional de Presupuesto Público. Retrieved January 19, 2014, from http://www.asip.org.ar/en/content/top-down-budgeting-instrument-strengthen-budget-management Kavanagh, S. C. (2011). Zero Base Budgeting Modern Experiences and Current Perspectives. Chicago, Illinois: Government Finance Officers Association. Williams, D., & Calabrese, T. (2013). Towards a Metatheory of Budgeting. Economists International , 1, 178-207.
Mikesell, J. L. (2010). Fiscal administration: Analysis and applications for the public sector (8th ed.: 2010 custom edition). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning
For government budgeting to be effective, the process that guides it must be an evolving one. As the government gets bigger, it will most likely destabilize the existing method. Therefore, it must change to keep pace with the demands and growth of the country. The process must be capable of handling the complexity of our nation and its multifaceted needs so it will always need revisions and restructuring to face these new challenges. Its ultimate goal must be to reinforce the government and strengthen the country.
McManus, Doyle. “Drawing Budget Battle Lines.” Editorial. Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 14 Apr. 2011. Web. 5 June 2011. .
What is your role in development of the budget? What percentage of its development is at your discretion?
On January 14, 2015 the Local Finance Board (LFB), which is part of the Division of the Local Government Services in the State of New Jersey adopted Rule: N.J.A.C. 5:30-3.8, which requires municipalities in the State to complete on an annual basis a User-Friendly Budget document. As a result of this new requirement, for fiscal year 2015 beginning with calendar year municipalities (January 1 to December 31), New Jersey municipalities must submit as part of their annual budget package to the State, a User-Friendly Budget document. Additionally, the State of New Jersey is requiring that municipalities incorporate the User-Friendly Budget into the introduced municipal budget, as well as the final adopted municipal budget. Therefore with this requirement
Wildavsky, A., & Caiden, N. (2004). The new politics of the budgetary process (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson/Longman.
“After World War I, such arguments succeeded in rationalizing the budget process under the president’s authority: the 1921 Budget and Accounting Act gave presidents responsibility for overseeing individual agencies budget requires and unified; coordinated executive budget. A new organization, the Bureau of the Budget (BoB), was created within the Treasury Department to serve as the administration’s staff arm in endeavor” (Rudalevige,
Budgetary planning may differ between organizations. Single-period budgets and rolling budgets have methodologies that provide advantages and disadvantages that may make one budget time frame better than another. A single-period may require less time in planning during a fiscal year, but is less accurate than a rolling budget that is continuously planned on a repetitive basis. In either case, budgets are planned in advance in order for a company to operate profitably, and less so to have "actual results equal budgeted results." (p. 496)
A possible problem can arise if the superior uses higher budget proposals for subordinates as a standard, the benefits can then be very low when the subordinates submits lower budgets (Fisher et al., 2002). When subordinates submit significant lower budgets than their co-workers, they may even be sanctioned by their superior (Fisher et al., 2002).
Participative budgeting has the advantage of transferring information from the subordinate to their superior This knowledge is likely to be more reliable and accurate as the subordinate has direct contact with the activity and therefore is in the best position to make budget estimates. Participative Budgeting also gives subordinates the opportunity to discuss organisational issues with superiors, in which an exchange of information and ideas can help to solve problems and agree future actions (Nouri & Parker 1998). This transferral of information is important particularly when dealing with a matter of high task difficulty as, the more difficult a task, the greater the need for consultation with subordinates. Participative budgeting has a higher performance rate when dealing with more difficult and more volatile tasks than non consultative budgeting (Lau & Tan 1998)
Secondly, their study also proves that instead of focusing on if they are within the budget limit, managers have more time to spend on solving the problem. In addition, since the focus is on getting new project all the time, their study has proven that what empowers people is dynamic resource allocation. Despite the possibility that their study represents a successful use of implementing BB, where both employees and managers agree that this is a superior control system, replacing budgets with BB can still cause troubles. There are a minimum of three challenges that organizations need to consider when they choose to to get rid of budget which are the ambition problem, the sub - optimalization game problem, and the employee exchange problem. Firstly, the ambition problem is a problem where the ambition is set by competitors instead of decentralized managers.
Line item budgeting categorizes various expenses and places them in list format on a document for budgetary purposes. This type of budgeting is considered the heartbeat of budgeting due to the systematic method by which it controls revenue and expenses, this is made evident when Tyer and Willand (1992), pointed out “Statutory or administrative controls could be imposed on the transfer of funds from one-line item to another, or between broad categories of expenditure.” According to Schick (1971), “line item budgets were attractive to legislative officials because they did not focus explicit attention on substantive policy issues or choices.”
There are many weaknesses of traditional budgeting model and it has been the matter of considerable caviling. From recently research by Libby and Linsay, 2010 cited from Hansen et. al., 2003 encapsulated several discussions of budgets an...
It requires an adequate and sound organizational structure, that is, there must be a definite assignment of responsibility for each function of the enterprise. Budgeting compels all the members of management, from the top to bottom to participate in the establishment of goals and plans. Budgeting compels departmental managers to make plans in harmony with the other departments and of the entire enterprise. Budgeting helps the management to put down in figures what is necessary for a satisfactory performance. Budgeting helps the management to plan for the most economical use of labor, material and capital. Budgeting tends to remove the cloud of uncertainty that exists in many organizations, especially among lower levels of management, relative to basic policies and objectives. Budgeting promotes an understanding among members of management of their co-workers' problems. Budgeting force management to give adequate attention to the effects of general business conditions. Budgeting aids in obtaining bank credit as banks commonly require a projection of future operations and cash flows to support
The national budget is the main instrument through which governments collect resources from the economy, in a sufficient and appropriate manner; and allocate and use those resources responsively, efficiently and effectively (Todorovic & Djordjevic, 2009). The work of public budget has increased extremely more complicated, abstruse and worrying (Hou, 2006, p.730).