Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tobacco's use & its effect on health essay
Consequences of tobacco essay
Consequences of tobacco
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tobacco's use & its effect on health essay
The use of tobacco has been linked to many diseases. On every cigarette pack sold in the United States, there is a warning which indicates the potential for adverse heath effects from smoking cigarettes. Among these effects are low birth weights for pregnant women, emphysema, and cancer. This is evidenced by numerous studies. The smoking population in India are not immune. In order to curb the public costs of caring for individuals who have been affected by smoking, legislators in India decided to craft a bill which prohibited tobacco companies from advertising and the sponsorship of athletic and cultural events. This effort was met with opposition from tobacco companies, as they claimed the legislation would affect their businesses. Legislators cited their responsibility to their constituents well-being as reason to prohibit tobacco advertising. In this case analysis, I will explain the positions of those who supported the tobacco advertising ban, those who opposed it, and discuss the conflict of interests among the Indian government that interfered with the passing of the legislation.
In 2001, Indian legislators, with the best of intentions, cited many reasons why a ban on tobacco advertising would be in the best interest of the people they govern. Legislators felt a moral responsibility to their people, and therefore the health and well-being of their people was paramount to tobacco company revenue. When people are healthy, they are more likely to live longer, work longer, and be more productive. Because of this, they will be able to contribute more money into the state 's coffers. Advocates of the tobacco advertising ban looked to countries such as France, Norway, and Finland, which had already instituted the ban. They set ...
... middle of paper ...
...ticipate in my choice. Government is best suited to provide for its people 's defense not to be an overreaching parental figure. Considering the level of corruption in our government and the blatant inefficiency in all facets of governmental operation, I can not trust the government to make any decisions for me, no matter the potential repercussions. Government has no business prohibiting any substance from being possessed by adults, nor should they prohibit a company from advertising its product. Unless the advertisement is geared toward those who are legally incapable of making their own decisions, and it respects the societal norms of decency, government should keep its nose out of the people 's business.
Ban on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India. (2010). Retrieved July 12, 2016, from http://www.icmrindia.org/free resources/casestudies/ban-tobacco-ads11.htm
Vidal gives key facts on how this would work out, he says that it is freedom and that instead of banning the drug put a label on it with side effects so that the person knows what they are putting into their body before they do it. I believe in Vidal because despite that some drugs are extremely bad for your body, people should have control over what they want into their body. It is their own individual right to do what they want to themselves. I oppose Vidal though because giving someone this freedom can come crashing down very quick. A lot more addiction in drugs could be seen. Individual freedom is a difficult topic to even discuss. But if someone 's individual freedom affects your own in a negative way, should it
positive and healthful image. This is where beautiful men and women would be seen socializing
The tobacco industry seems like a beneficial addition to our economy. It has basically been a socially acceptable business in the past because it brings jobs to our people and tax money to the government to redistribute; but consider the cost of tobacco related treatment, mortality and disability- it exceeds the benefit to the producer by two hundred billion dollars US. (4) Tobacco is a very profitable industry determined to grow despite government loss or public health. Its history has demonstrated how money can blind morals like an addiction that is never satisfied. Past lawsuits were mostly unsuccessful because the juries blamed the smoker even though the definition of criminal negligence fits the industry’s acts perfectly. Some may argue for the industry in the name of free enterprise but since they have had such a clear understanding of the dangers of their product it changes the understanding of their business tactics and motives. The success of the industry has merely been a reflection of its immoral practices. These practices have been observed through its use of the media in regards to children, the tests that used underage smokers, the use of revenue to avoid the law, the use of nicotine manipulation and the suppression of research.
Sloan Wilson did not publish The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit, a classic on 1950's middle-class conformity, until 1955. But, by July 1953, PALL MALL cigarette advertisers appear aware that "society seemed to reward those who lacked rough edges and eschewed eccentricity" (Blum 794). This conclusion seems justified by a TIME magazine advertisement. Here, these promoters apply this conformity principle and other advertising techniques to a specific socioeconomic group. They seek to lure the expanding male, middle-class audience by presenting indecorous fun, an enticing social situation, and smooth smoking delight all stemming from their product.
Smoking Kills. This is no longer a myth, it’s a fact. According to the British Medical Journal, every time a person smoke a cigarette, he or she will lose about eleven minutes of life here on earth and subject yourself to cancer. In the advertisement below, you can easily tell from just looking at the picture that this ad is against smoking. The ad portrays the message that smoking is deadly, and is able to be comprehended by people of all ages in the hopes that the viewers do not get into a fatal habit such as abusing cigarettes. Essentially, smoking cigarettes is a long term form of suicide. A man is holding a lit cigarette in his hand with his middle and pointer finger, and his thumb held up. As shown in the
There is clearly no way tobacco will never be outlawed but I believe there should be tighter restrictions on age limits throughout the world, and restrictions on the materials that are used in cigarette processing. Who is just letting cigarette companies continue to poison people and cause cancer risk? Throughout my essay I will analyze the affects of cigarette use on the society of the world and the elaborate corruption that keeps cigarette companies in business.
Tobacco companies should be prevented from using advertising tactics that target teenagers. There has always been controversy as to how tobacco companies should prevent using advertising tactics to target teenagers. As controversial as this is tobacco companies shouldn’t advertise teen smoking. Many teens may be lured to believe cigarette advertising because it has been part of the American Culture for years, magazine ads and the media target young people, and these companies receive a drastic increase financially; however, the advertising by these cigarette companies has disadvantages such as having to campaign against their own company, limiting their cigarette advertising and becoming a controversial dilemma as to encouraging teenagers to smoke. From billboards to newspaper advertisements, cigarette promotions started becoming part of the American Culture.
Each year 440,000 people die, in the United States alone, from the effects of cigarette smoking (American Cancer Society, 2004). As discussed by Scheraga & Calfee (1996) as early as the 1950’s the U.S. government has utilized several methods to curb the incidence of smoking, from fear advertising to published health warnings. Kao & Tremblay (1988) and Tremblay & Tremblay (1995) agreed that these early interventions by the U.S. government were instrumental in the diminution of the national demand for cigarettes in the United States. In more recent years, state governments have joined in the battle against smoking by introducing antismoking regulations.
A child who has lost his mother in a busy airport is a scenario that most audiences pay attention to. It’s thrilling in a way- will the protagonist find his mother? This video commercial is one that leads the way in the anti-smoking campaign. A young boy is walking alongside with his parental and the next minute is alone. Looking around trying to locate her, the effort is unsuccessful. Unaware what to do next, he cries and cries (See Figure 1). A narrator voices, “If this is how your child feels for losing you for a minute, just imagine if they lost you for life. (13QUIT)”
Images are a powerful force in advertising as they are the ones that promote different perceptions and attitudes towards products. They are also the ones that create stereotypes. They are very manipulative, for they will never focus on the negative things that are associated with their products, only the positive ones. Advertisements are ambitious which gives them power, and engage customers for their approval.
Some people might ask “why should Marijuana be Legalized?” but the question we all should be asking is “Why is Marijuana Illegal?” From a physiological standpoint, I believe individuals deserve the right to make choices for themselves. The government should only have the right to infringe on those choices if the individual’s actions endanger others, or pose a significant threat to the individual; nevertheless this argument therefore does not logically apply to Marijuana because Marijuana is proven to have medical use and is far less dangerous than most drugs which are legal, such as tobacco and alcohol. Individuals should have the right to decide whether or not they want to use marijuana, excluding minors.
Although it is beneficial for the economy for the production of tobacco products it is extremely risky to use the product. According to researchers second-hand smoke is terrible for everyone in the world who walk by someone who is exhaling. In the article by Robert Proctor “Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition” he states that cigarettes are the “most deadl...
"FDA bans flavored cigarettes as part of new tobacco control act." Hem/Onc Today 25 Oct. 2009: 2. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 23 Nov. 2009.
Cigarette advertisements give the feeling that smokers are "bursting at the seams with joy" and that smoking is useful to you. Shockingly, nothing could be further from reality. The U.S. government has marked cigarettes as an unsafe medication that causes lung malignancy, coronary illness, and numerous different genuine sicknesses and conditions. Numerous individuals everywhere throughout the nation are discussing whether tobacco organizations ought to be permitted to publicize cigarettes or even to make cigarettes in today 's general public ("Analyzing Assorted Tobacco Advertisements").
Plessis, Pierre D. "Should Alcohol and Cigarette Ads Be Banned." Living Healthy 360. N.p., 2 July 2008. Web. 08 Dec. 2013.