ng children and teens are the easiest target for Tobacco Companies. Tobacco Companies have found ways to dodge the restrictions and regulations that the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have put into action. Though Tobacco Companies claim their forms of advertising does not influence children and teenagers, their advertising techniques and icons clearly have a huge effect on young audiences.
Some people may wonder why there are restrictions on tobacco advertising, and others will give facts to argue reasons why. The FDA believes Tobacco Companies aim their products towards minors though Tobacco Companies deny they do, yet they claim their target audience is from the ages 18 through 21. Though these are the age groups they hope to target, other age groups are being targeted as well. These age groups are children younger than the age of three years old. In the article Smooth Sell by Susan Cohen, Tye, a man who was getting an MBA in 1985 at Stanford University was driving through the south of San Francisco with his 5-year-old daughter when she spotted a Marlboro billboard that excited her so much she began squealing with delight. He explains, “She was jumping up and down and saying, ‘Look, Daddy, horses!’” as they passed the glossy image of galloping hooves splashing through a stream. Tye says he realized with a shock that, whether Philip Morris intended to or not, its imagery was reaching children (Cohen). Children have been sucked into the imagery Tobacco Companies provide to advertise their products. Dues to the imagery reaching young audiences advertising was banned on television and broadcasting.
Furthermore, since young children have been introduced and exposed to tobacco advertising, children younger than the age o...
... middle of paper ...
... fit in a community, group or gang, to escape or to relax, to feel grown up among other peers, to relieve boredom and give personal excitement, to rebel and get violent without fear, to experiment out of curiosity and the most obvious, peer pressure. These are the excuses Tobacco Companies give people when they claim their advertising is not effecting teenagers, just 18 year old and over. Not one, two, or three year younger teenagers who are under the same understanding of 18 year old when it comes to cigarettes. If Tobacco Companies don’t appreciate what the FDA is doing to their companies, such as gaining the right to put restrictions and regulation on their products, then why do they need icons to make money? The reason is because Tobacco Companies claim they need advertising icons like The Marlboro Man and Joe Camel to replace smokers who have either quit or die.
Tobacco companies should be prevented from using advertising tactics that target teenagers. There has always been controversy as to how tobacco companies should prevent using advertising tactics to target teenagers. As controversial as this is tobacco companies shouldn’t advertise teen smoking. Many teens may be lured to believe cigarette advertising because it has been part of the American Culture for years, magazine ads and the media target young people, and these companies receive a drastic increase financially; however, the advertising by these cigarette companies has disadvantages such as having to campaign against their own company, limiting their cigarette advertising and becoming a controversial dilemma as to encouraging teenagers to smoke. From billboards to newspaper advertisements, cigarette promotions started becoming part of the American Culture.
Tobacco companies have relied on the media to lure children. They quickly realized that ‘the company that dominates is that which most effectively targets young”(Imperial Tobacco document.) To counteract the idea of disease and other negative aspects of tobacco, the industry used imagery in the media such as natural settings and healthy actors doing active things. This helps them to insinuate that smoking leads to success, romance, sophistication and other advancements in their lifestyle, which was easily imprinted in the minds of children. A document found among Imperial tobacco files described their priority: “…having our imagery reach those non-reading young people who frequent malls should be our chief goal.”(1.170) Unaware of how important the under 18 market was to the industry, the government could only attempt to lengthen the distance between schools and billboards because they’re ineffective attempts were ignored by the large corporations. With many billboards concentrated in small areas it put the idea in children’s minds that smoking was socially acceptable and that t...
Over the last 50 years, smoking and the public image of smoking has changed dramatically. Americans have learned the harmful effects of smoking and have put a heavy disdain on the use of it. The number of new smokers has drastically dropped over the years and many that had previously smoked have stopped. Some have turned to electronic cigarettes as a safer way to intake nicotine. Over the years, smoking advertisements have changed drastically. Nowadays, tobacco advertisements are virtually non-existent in our society, but when they were abundant they depicted smoking as a cool and sophisticated activity. Today, smoking advertisements are shown by electronic cigarette companies. These companies emphasize the healthier lifestyle these products
Cigarette advertisements reflect society’s love-hate relationship with tobacco products through the ages. During its heyday of popularity, cigarette advertisements were not governed in any way, allowing tobacco companies to use any means necessary to sell their products including advertising during popular children’s television shows. This practice came under scrutiny around 1964 when the Surgeon General released its first report on “smoking and health.” This report stated that smoking may be hazardous to your health. Soon to follow the release of this report was a ban on all cigarette advertisements on television and radio.
The intended target audience has varied a lot the past century. Cigarette use within the United States military increased significantly during their entrance into World War l, in 1918, because several tobacco companies began targeting military personnel because soldiers used cigarettes as a physiological escape from the horrors of their daily lives. However, women were also especially targeted during the years of war in America, as most consumer goods were aimed at women since the majority of men were at war. To begin with, women were portrayed in cigarette ads as non-smoking admirers of smoking men, however, by 1927 cigarette adverts with women smokers began to appear in women’s magazines. In the years that came, brands such as Marlboro, continued to attract the female audience into buying cigarettes by using slogans like ‘’Mild as May’’ and altering the product by printing red filters to hide lipstick stains, which they called ‘’Beauty Tips to Keep the Paper from Your Lips’’ and attracted a lot of women, despite the fact that woman smokers were not socially accepted yet. The Marlboro cigarette brand, which was essentially launched as a woman’s cigarette, continually launched advertisement campaigns in order to keep attracting them to their products. Cigarette companies persuaded their audience through beauty themes, by implying they would look great as a result of weight-loss by choosing to smoke cigarettes instead of eating and by using toddlers in adverts to attract attention in the female region through motherhood. An example of this is Appendix 2, from a collection of cigarette advertisements from the time (1951), shows a baby saying, ‘’Before you scold me, Mom… maybe you’d better light up a Marlboro,‘’ this makes w...
While todays major tobacco producers deny that they market to the youth. However, we still see them subliminally targeting children through magazine advertisements, store posters, and Internet ads. In addition, they continue to use product placement strategies in mov...
According to WHO, "each year 6 million people die due to tobacco related illnesses. If current trends continue, it is projected that by 2030, tobacco will be responsible for more than 8 million deaths each year and 80% of these premature deaths will be among people living in low- and middle-income countries.” Tobacco advertising is a worldwide marketing campaign that displays bright and colorful images that appeal towards teens and young adults. These images portray false ideal of masculinity, youth, and freedom. The prohibitions of tobacco advertising should be enforced by the government in order to prevent tobacco industries from targeting undeveloped countries with poor education, reduce tobacco related illnesses,
An article from nearly three decades ago asks if it “...is free speech to lure children with images they've been taught to trust, cartoon images, to a product the surgeon general has called an addiction that can lead to death?” (G. Desroches, 1994). The Supreme Court ruled that these types of advertisements are relegated to commercial speech as opposed to hate speech. Although cigarettes have been proven fatal and offensive, their advertisers have carte blanche within the realm of commercial
...y has a long history of working to influence Hollywood. The power of film to promote the “social acceptability” and desirability of tobacco use, particularly among young people, is a continuing inducement for the tobacco industry to utilise this medium. The increase in tobacco use and the continuing appearance of specific brands in movies since 1990 may reflect continuing activities by the tobacco industry, despite the industry's voluntary restrictions on such practices. It may be that, as with provisions of the industry's voluntary advertising code that nominally restricts print marketing to children, the industry finds ways around its own rules.
Notwithstanding such information, children continue to evolve into a society that does not specify just how life-threatening tobacco is, and, with today’s societal standards, many will never see to believe that peer pressure is not as prevalent as it appears to be in our world today. Anti-smoking ads exist in the countries that do not have a national legislation passed against smoking. Yet, those ads aid in showing just how much of one’s life and freedom is needed in order to so much as humour the idea of buying a pack of
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been in charge of overseeing the production and advertisement of tobacco products since 2009 (“Tobacco Control Act” 1). This power was given to the FDA by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, and has allowed them to limit the advertising of tobacco products to youth (“Tobacco Control Act” 1). The FDA uses this law to prevent youth use of tobacco products, but has also created their own anti-tobacco advertisement campaign, called “The Real Cost”. “The Real Cost” campaign's goal is to educate at-risk teens of the dangers of tobacco use and to prevent and reduce youth tobacco users. One of the advertisements in this campaign is “Science Class”. In the their anti-tobacco advertisement,
The extent at which cigarettes were consumed in the twentieth century in the United States grew so much to the point that “between 1990 and 1965, per capita consumption rose from 49 to 4918” (Brandt 157). There are many factors that lead to this major consumption of cigarettes, but one that greatly aided in this was mass marketing and advertising. Allan Brandt states in his article, The Cigarette Risk and American Culture , “advertising promised consumers well-being and power” (Brandt 157). Advertising misleads people from the negative and unknown effects of cigarettes, to a blind world in which cigarettes gave people a sense of well-being and power. It created “demand for relatively undifferentiated, nonessential items” which “was the core of the new consumer culture” and the cigarette epitomizes this (Brandt 157). Tobacco companies people feel as though the world of smoking cigarettes would be promising, one in which made the individual as manly as “The Marlboro Man” of Marlboro Cigarettes or as cool as “Joe Camel” of Camel
The tobacco industry consists of many competitors trying to satisfy a specific customer need. Companies such as Philip Morris, RJ Reynolds, Brown and Williamson, and Lorillard hold almost the entire market share in the tobacco industry. While each company has different advertising and marketing techniques, they all target the same customer group. Tobacco companies try their best to generate interest in their particular brand or brands. Companies market a number of attributes that usually include, but are not limited to: taste, flavor, strength, size and image in order to distinguish themselves from competitors (Business Week 179, November 29, 1999). However, all tobacco companies are satisfying the same needs. Many long-time smokers are addicted to the nicotine in cigarettes. They smoke because the nicotine is needed to help them feel normal (Focus group). Many addicts go through withdraw without nicotine. All tobacco companies have nicotine in their cigarettes, which fulfills the need of long-time smokers. Other smokers depend on cigarettes in social settings. Many smoke to look sophisticated and mature. Tobacco companies make many kinds of cigarettes that target different groups. Social smokers may perceive certain brands as more sophisticated, and therefore they shy away from other lesser-known brands. For example, a person who smoked generic cigarettes at the bar may be perceived as uncultured. On the other hand, the smoker with the Marlboro Lights may be more socially accepted because they have a brand name product (Focus group). Many types of cigarettes cater to the many markets of smokers who want to portray a certain image in social settings. Tobacco companies do not create the need to smoke, but try to generate interest in their particular brand (Hays, New York Times, November 24, 1999). Overall, the tobacco companies satisfy consumer demand for the millions of adult Americans who choose to use tobacco by providing differentiated products to different target markets of smokers.
One way that the tobacco industry can be more ethical is changing their advertising strategy. I believe that today’s advertising strategy is very misleading about cigarettes. Examples of this unethical advertising is in Argentina, here 20 percent of television advertising is spent on smoking commercials, as well as in countries in and around Africa there are billboards that depict a man in a business suit stepping out of a black Mercedes as a chauffeur holds the door. This displays that cigarettes make people classy and sophisticated, making cigarettes look not only harmless but stylish. Another good example of unethical depiction on cigarettes is in Nigeria; here they promote a cigarette for graduates, with a picture of a university and a student in a cap and gown. As if this wasn’t a misleading visual they add a slogan that says, "A very important cigarette for very important people." These ads and slogan are ...
Should tobacco and alcohol advertising be allowed on television? The ban on advertising tobacco is already in affect, however, alcohol is another harmful substance. Should liquor be allowed to be advertised, if tobacco can not advertise their product? The ban on advertising tobacco products on television and radio, was passed through legislation in 1970 by Richard Nixon. This argument like others out there has two sides, one side in favor these advertisements and the other against these advertisements. Since both of these substances are highly addictive and costly. Would we like to see these advertisements continued? Are these advertisements the hazard they are communicated to be? Through the research of these two important sides, this essay will explore which side has a stronger stance on the topic.