Whether or not Alexander was “great” or not “great” has been a question debated throughout history. Alexander the Great lived from 356 to 323 B.C. As the King of Greece, he conquered much of Asia and Europe. In order to be great, one needs to be disciplined, care for others, and be intelligent. By these standards, Alexander was great because he was disciplined and persevered, he cared about his followers, and he had strong military tactics. One reason that Alexander was great was he disciplined and persevered. At the time of Alexander’s death, his empire was about 2,000,000 square miles, and the Roman Empire at its greatest was 2,200,000 square miles. (Document E). This shows that Alexander must have very disciplined in order to have conquered that much land. The Roman Empire had different leaders, so all of the land was not gotten by one leader. This also shows how Alexander must have persevered because it must have not been easy to conquer all that land by himself. Another example of perseverance …show more content…
While marching, Alexander and his troops were quenched and needed water. Finally, Alexander and his troops reached water. His troops went to the water and collected it in a helmet to give to Alexander who then poured the water on the ground (Arrianus, “Document D”). This action showed that Alexander was suffering, and this reassured the men that they were not alone when struggling. Another example of Alexander caring for his followers is that he listens to his troops. “Finally, at the Indus River is western India, Alexander was stopped … by his own army, which refused to go further. After eight years of combat and conquest, Alexander … turned back” (“How Great Was Alexander the Great”?). This shows that Alexander respects his troops which means that he admires them for sticking with him for the past eight years. So, because Alexander respects his troops, he also cares about and listens to
...here are few people in history that can claim the military prowess, uncanny political maneuvering, and the overall lasting effect of the dissemination of a particular culture such as Alexander. Alexander’s exploits led to the spread of the Greek culture throughout Asia and Africa. They even went so far as to impact the Romans who dominated Hellenistic Egypt. He left in his wake and expansion of territory and commerce, with expanded trading ports and the exportation of the Greek political system. Christianity emerged with the Hellenization of the Jews and spread throughout Hellenized gentile communities. It seems impossible to catalogue every impact of Alexander’s empire. In the end, I have to conclude that Alexander does ‘fully deserve’ the title of “the Great.”
Darius had an advantage over Alexander the Great, he had more troops, better resources, and he chose the battle field. Although Darius had the advantage he was not as smart as Alexander. Alexander had good communication with his troops; he planned according, in addition he was well organized before the battled. He did not stray away from his plan he stuck to it. Alexander troops were heavily armed they moved in formation, and they were shield with their long spears they stayed close together and moved in formation. In addition he did not have all his troops engaged in the battle at once he planned an awesome attack strategy that won him and his troops the war.
One reason that Alexander is great is that he was brilliant in battle because of his genius war strategies. An example is when he manipulated the Indian Army, led by King Porus, so that he and his army could cross the Hydaspes River secretly without the Indians knowing. First, Alexander made them think that they were unprepared and would stay for a long time until the monsoon season ended by ordering a large shipment of grain and walking up and down the river as if they were looking for a place to cross. This eventually made the Indian soldiers stop following the Macedonian troops when they left camp. Alexander made them accustomed to sound by making loud noises. He also crossed the river at night during a thunderstorm, which kept them hidden in the darkness and sound. Alexander split his army two groups to make the Indian army split up and be confused which contingent was the stronger one led by Alexander. Alexander the Great also had a great war strategy called “left hook”, when he was fighting Poru...
Alexander didn’t show any of these characteristics, therefore he doesn’t deserve the title of “great”. The first reason why Alexander lll wasn’t great is because he didn’t show concern for others. In document B it states “Porus’ elephants were now boxed in, and the damage inflicted by them fell on friend no less than foe, with men trampled under as the beast twisted and turned. In document E it states “Years that it took Alexander to build his empire-11 Years that Alexander’s empire held together after his death-10” Alexander the “great” doesn’t show any intelligence because he forgot to make a will with an heir for his empire leaving it confused and aggressive because no one knew who was going to rule.
Alexander The Great was a king of ancient Greek kingdom Macedon. He ruled in many places, like in, Greece,Persia,and Egypt. Alexander ruled through 336-323 B.C. , only 13 years in office. He was known for being the greatest military geniuses of all time. Alexander the Great was a villain because he sold 20,000 people into slavery,he treated overthrown territories with cruelty, and Alexander took over many countries and he was still not satisfied.
The son of Philip II, Alexander the Great, will become the conqueror of the western world. Alexander received the Macedonian empire when his father passed, he was only twenty at the time. As soon as he had the power of the Macedonian army, several lightning fast campaigns led them into the west and north. Next, he compelled the city-states that rebelled against the League of Corinth. This action demonstrated how Alexander punished disloyalty [Martin 244]. Alexander was able to keep his rule on the territories he conquered by rewarded the cities who recognized his powers and punished the individuals that betrayed his trust or ambitions. The power he possessed depended on his superior force and his unwillingly desire to use it [Martin 245]. The
Alexander the Great is great because of his remarkable achievement which helped to create a long lasting legacy. Alexander started to build his empire in 334 BCE after taking the new role as the king. It only took eleven years to build an empire that was large and lasted several years. In addition, the empire Alexander created stretched over 2,200,000 square miles becoming bigger than the United States (Alexander’s Empire Doc. A) (Alexander’s Legacy Doc, E). This proves that Alexander the Great is great because although the process was eleven long years to make a strong empire, Alexander wasn’t willing to give up and
Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...
Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.
Alexander the 3rd of Macedon (Alexander the Great). Son the king Phillips the 2nd. Alexander was a man who thought himself to be a god, famously known for never losing a battle. A king Idolized by many throughout history and for millennial his name still alive as a result of his greatness. The Macedonia king was Born in the classical Greek period, in 356 B.C.E and his death marked the end of that same time period in 323 B.C.E. Alexander created the largest empire in the ancient world and lastly he was indeed what every conqueror would’ve ever wanted to be, a military genius, a warrior, a Pharaoh, a king, a real legend. The legacy of Alexander represents the real idealism of true greatness which can split into different parts. There is a fascinating
Alexander the great was great. He conquered many areas for his people and provided for them, and built the areas that he had conquered into well developed cities. One of the big reasons that made him great was that his people and many other people had respected him.
Why was Alexander the Great called great? Maybe it was because he was supposedly the son of Zeus, or maybe because he conquered the biggest empire of his time. Possibly it was that he solved the impossible knot, but most likely it is a mix of things. All we know is that Alexander was one of Greece’s best kings and he greatly influenced Greek culture and history. He was definitely great.
Students think that they learn everything there is to learn about the past and this is because students think there is too much information to remember. In conversations, there is much talk of wars and people and those subjects will most likely be remembered because they are referred to the most. Alexander the Great played one of the biggest roles as King of Macedon (present day Europe) by conquering Persia, beginning the Hellenistic Age, and building a durable militia. Alexander the Great should be included in the teachings of world history because he accomplished far more than other conquerors could in a short time span. World history takes Alexander for granted. Alexander was the man to put to any job because he could accomplish anything. His empire stretched from Greece to India because the city-states in Greece were weak and easy to control. In order to be successful, Alexander went through great struggles and found his way to trounce them.
Alexander the Great was a noble leader, he made his soldiers a large priority. On the return march after 13 years, ships are sent to send men home and Alexander
In contemporary society, individuals consider Alexander the Great to be the greatest warrior in history. He was a Macedonian warrior at the age of 14, a general at the age of 18 and King at the age of 19. As king, he conquered lands and gained the support of many civilizations along the way for about 12 years (Encyclopedia of World Biography 1988). It is extremely apparent that Alexander the Great possessed numerous highly desired qualities, such as intelligence, ambition and determination. However, Alexander the Great also possessed various negative qualities, such as his brutality, greed and manipulative ways. Regardless of the character traits he has developed over time, it is extremely appalling, as well as impressive, that he was able to conquer and achieve so much, at such a young age.