Thororeeau Vs. Thoreau's Idea Of Civil Disobedience

1144 Words3 Pages

As individuals, people believe they are allowed to fully practice Thoreau’s idea of Civil Disobedience to a certain extent. Growing up in today’s society people dislike the government and all the lousy rules rules and laws they enforce society with. Everyone is different in society, who you are now is determined by who you were around while growing up. People usually decide after adolescence, if you want to do what’s considered the right or wrong thing, this falls into his idea of civil disobedience. Through yourself as an individual, you get to decide what and what not to do. After a while no one is going to be beside you to mentor you and decide what’s right or wrong.
People are first going to do what they think is “right” rather than asking …show more content…

Her act of civil disobedience not only was so bad to the public eye, it got her arrested. Although she got arrested, her bravery of not giving up her sit on the day that day aided and helped the civil rights movement as a whole. Which is why civil disobedience is such a profound way of getting change through unjust laws. She received many honors and awards because of her bravery and will be forever remembered by her brave act of defiance and civil disobedience. She was applauded by the people and looked up to a sort of a hero. Her heroic acts reminded people then and now that there is still power in the people’s hands. You just have to know when to put your foot down if you want to see peace, fairness, and change from a certain particular group. In this case the particular group was the government. Just like when Elizabeth Cady Stanton mentioned in her essay on Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions. She said, “Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of those who suffer from it to refuse allegiance to it, and to insist upon the institution of a new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness” (272). Rosa Parks saw that the government at the time was being destructives and …show more content…

So now if a person decided to come along and try to challenge an unjust law through civil disobedience, hoping they’ll have such an impact that the government decides to change that law would be rare. People now live so freely that it would be hard to get a large portion of a population to protest or even comply through civil disobedience. Civil disobedience can really work for changing unfair laws that require face to face obedience, and it tends not to work when you don’t have to be face to face with that unjust law. When its not affecting the lives of people directly, people are not going to go out of their way to try and change it, even if its affecting someone close to as their next door

Open Document