Thomas Jefferson: Divisiveness And Explusion Of The United States

1462 Words3 Pages

From my perspective, Johnson’s view on the period can be characterized as divisiveness and exclusion for the American people. He wrote about the American republic from both Thomas Jefferson’s and Hamilton’s perspective to basically determine how America should be governed. Moreover, he wrote that Washington was chosen by electors because he did well at each task he was given and he was prepared to take charge of the people. Washington was also elected in order to clean up the nations finances after the Revolutionary war, therefore, he appointed Hamilton as the Secretary of state to take care of the debts of the country. American had accumulated debts during the time of the war because they invested a lot of money in it. Johnson wrote “In 1775 …show more content…

Jefferson believed that America would only be successful if there was an equilibrium between farmers and planters. In Zinn’s discussion about Jefferson, he stated that Jefferson wanted a healthy society. This healthy society should include rebellion, unlike what Hamilton thought, he would much rather put an end to any form of rebellion that’s why he rounded militia to dissolve the rebellion against individuals who did not want to pay taxes. This supports the notion of the era being exclusive. Both Thomas Jefferson Celebrates the virtue of the Yeoman Farmer, 1782 and Alexandre Hamilton Envisions a Developed American Economy 1791 document supports the divisiveness and exclusion of the time period because the Federalist and Democratic-Republicans had different insight on how the country should be governed. The Republican represented by Jefferson, wanted the people to labor and do crafts goods as well. However, the Federalists represented by Hamilton, wanted to do Machinery, increase employment, he promoted emigration and he also spoke about diversity. Hamilton discussed how the wealth of the country can be gained through manufacturing and the importance of agriculture to the economy. Though these notions from both sides were vital it brought about exclusion of the people and forced them to choose a side basically.
One point Johnson discusses that also supports the divisiveness of the era is the fact that …show more content…

The article Margaret Fuller, Woman in the Nineteenth Century, 1845, this document revealed that it was not much of a democracy, if women did not have equal rights as men. The article discussed the fact that men did not take into consideration women 's views on their ‘duties’ and whether or not they were satisfied with them. The article argued that women can do what a man can do and they should be treated as equals or at least have legal rights. Another document that discussed women 's rights and discussed that fact that they were excluded from equal right is Declaration of Sentiment of the Seneca Falls Convention, 1848. Women wanted to end slavery, they would attend anti-slavery crusade, but because they did not have rights it was difficult to for them to put an end to slavery. They wanted to be treated as equals; the law was only in the favor of men. These women suffered, they were deprived of education and some were not accepted into colleges. Women of the Native American tribes, even spoke against the oppression from Jackson democracy, in the document Cherokee Women, petition, and these women of the Cherokee tribe argued that even though it was unusual for women to get involved in public affairs, they felt compelled to speak out against the oppression. Due to the nature of Jackson’s

Open Document