Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemmas
To what extent do problems turn into nails based on the area of knowledge ? To begin to look at this knowledge issue I will be using three different knowledge areas to examine this question. Ethics, Reason, and Emotion will be the three knowledge areas. These knowledge areas will allow for three unique examinations with claims and counter-claims to this statement that Maslow makes. The pursuit of knowledge is something done across a lifetime, finding out what does and does not work to solve problems in certain knowledge areas is part of the process. While Abraham Maslow brings up a valid point, there is both evidence of this being true and false. Sometimes generalizations can be made, and while they are based off of truth, there is evidence that the generalization can be false. With that said, there are limitations to the statement, “When the only tool you have is a hammer, all problems begin to resemble nails.” Ethical problems can all be solved the same way if all you have to determine the outcome is your ethical standpoint. Throughout life, many decisions that need to be made are those of ethical opinions. Normal people, with no political power and no external pressures can make their own moral decisions based off their own ethical standpoint. Even those with power, when making decisions for a whole group of people can use their ethical outlook to make a decision and solve the problem. No matter the problem it is possible to solve it looking at it ethically. It is for the gain of the person making the decision in the pursuit of knowledge. A real life example of this that has occurred in my life was when I was forced to choose between two different schools. One that was close to my home, a school that lacked motivation from the... ... middle of paper ... ...tion can be reached. We have all these tools that can be used to find solution that will help find a better solution if combined rather than used individually. Someone that lacks in a couple of these ways of knowing may disagree. If one’s ability to use language and reason is not developed well, than it would be necessary to possibly only use one way of knowing. They are forced into a position where they must find solutions by using only one way of knowing, and this might be what they prefer over trying to use multiple. By using only one way of knowing or one area of knowledge, we gain less information/knowledge about problems that occur. In the pursuit of knowledge, we try to find out as much as possible before a solution in proposed. By using multiple ways and areas of knowledge, one will become more knowledgeable, and thus formulate the best solution possible.
At times in a person’s life, they might come across a few situations that leave them with a major decision between two or more options that challenge what they believe or what they might think is wrong or right. These are known as ethical dilemmas. Be it seeing a friend steal something and choosing between being honest and speaking up or letting it go. It can also be getting paid more than you earned and deciding if you’re going to be greedy and keep the money or return it. We run into these situations in our lives, some bigger and more influential on our destiny’s while others are small with no real consequences.
An ethical dilemma is defined as a moral issue, where a situation has two equivalent undesirable alternatives and neither choice will resolve the ethical predicament.
“As a human being, one has been endowed with just enough intelligence to be able to see clearly how utterly inadequate that intelligence is when confronted with that exists” (Albert Einstein) Everyone is intelligent in many ways. People can also learn in many, many ways. An example is how musicians are smart in music and write the music in many ways. There are many ways unexpected people are intelligent and here are three ways that people can be intelligent.
The movie “PRECIOUS KNOWLEDGE” is about the state of Arizona banning ethnic studies. The movie’s main focus is on Tucson High school, specifically the class known as the Mexican American/Raza Studies. They learned about the honest truths about America along with their own culture. However, many politicians saw this class as un-American and “Stalinist”. This movie showed that the students became thriving adults because they were able to learn about their own cultures. During a political meeting, many politicians felt like this was an unnecessary class that was wasting their tax dollars. One law maker goes as far to say that if Mexican Americans want to learn about their culture, they should go back to Mexico. Many people saw these Mexican American students as lazy and disinterested. This is related to the “canary in the mind pit” analogy because
Core knowledge is a psychological theory that proposes the idea that children have innate cognitive abilities that are the product of evolutionary mechanisms, called nativism. The theoretical approach of constructivism also includes that children have domain-specific learning mechanisms that efficiently collect additional information for those specific domains. The core knowledge theory is primarily focused on whether our cognitive abilities, or capacities, are palpable early on in development, or if these capacities come up during a later developmental phase (Siegler 168).
These foundations help us process the information we gather or receive to make the decision but may be processed with errors through jumping to conclusions from our System 1 or from misinformation from our external sources. Maintaining a diversity of information seeking may help with the effects of falling into the danger of error of heuristic. One solution stated by Schwartz in “The Paradox of Choice” is to include social interactions in the information gathering. With maintain a diversity, there is a higher involvement and getting the mind out of System 1 and into System 2.
Comprehend: In Gestalt view, unsolved problem is an opportunity for the student to either seek new information or rearrange old information until they gain insight into the solution. (p.276) to simplify it, when people are struggling in a learning process, they will either learn something completely new, or they will take the information they already possess in their mind, and rearrange in a way that will help them solve the problem at hand. People do that with mathematics, for example; they tried to use previous knowledge of math and tried to learn a new subject in math.
Throughout the book Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave many themes are developed relating to slavery. Such themes that are well developed include corruption, brutality, and knowledge. Perhaps the most important theme that was developed was knowledge and its power in everything. Frederick Douglass gained knowledge throughout his life, defying the laws surrounding slavery. Perhaps one of the most impressive things from the life of Frederick Douglass was the fact that, except for a few months at the beginning of his engagement with Mr. and Mrs. Auld, he was a self taught man who took it upon himself to expand his knowledge. Frederick Douglass discovered the power of knowledge and applied this to his life in many different stages. First, he discovered that knowledge is power. Second, he went out of his way to obtain all the knowledge he could. Third, he used that knowledge, that he had gained over years and years of self-taught, underground learning, and used it to run away from the brutal life of a slave. Finally, he used the knowledge he had gained to publicly speak against the institution of slavery and make it a point to earn the right of universal suffrage for all men. He presented many ideas, which we today, can see were very strong and moral convictions from his views as an abolitionist.
Consider the following analogy: There is a hammer, a nail and a piece of wood. Your task is to hammer the nail into the wall and split the wood. You effortlessly hammer the nail into the wall. However, splitting the wood is quite problematic. You can certainly bash the wood to the extent where it splits, but you cannot achieve optimal results. Like this analogy, as a student studying chemistry and art, I use reasoning to gain knowledge about the concepts in chemistry as it is more pragmatic, but I need emotion to truly establish an empathy, connection and understanding in Monet’s painting ‘Impression Sunrise’ in art as it manifests a type of knowledge only intrinsic to me beyond what can be attained if I were to use empirical reasoning. This simple analogy does not only apply to the problem encountered in attempting to cut a piece of wood when we are condemned to only a hammer as our tool, but also emphasizes a number of prospective issues that we may encounter in the pursuit of knowledge when we only use one way of knowing. To what extent, then, does Maslow’s analogy hold?
Keep in mind that the goal of sound ethical reasoning is not to reach the “right” solution but rather to rationally and systematically consider the ethical aspects of a case and to be clear about the basis on which the decision was made.
[2] An Ethical dilemma is defined as “a situation that arises when all alternative choices or behaviours have been deemed undesirable because of potentially negative ethical consequences, making it difficult to distinguish right from wrong” (Samson and Daft, 2005, p.158)
An ethical dilemma is only examined in a situation which has the following conditions; the first condition takes place in a situation, when an individual has to make a decision on which course of action is best. The second condition is there must be more than one course of action to choose from. The third action is no matter what course of action is taken, certain ethical principles are conceded. In other terms, there is no perfect result. When defining what forms an ethical dilemma, it is important to make a division between ethics, morals, values, laws and policies.
Knowledge is rarely considered permanent, because it is constantly changing and adapting as time passes and new discoveries are made. This title roughly translates into the question: to what extent is knowledge provisional? In other words, to what extent does knowledge exist for the present, possibly to be changed in the future? At first glance, one’s mind would immediately stray to the natural sciences, and how theories are constantly being challenged, disproven, and discarded. Because of this, one might be under the impression that knowledge is always provisional because there is always room for improvement; however, there are some cases in which this is not true. There are plenty of ideas and theories that have withstood the test of time, but on the other end of the spectrum there are many that have not. This essay will evaluate the extent to which knowledge is provisional in the areas of the human sciences and history.
4. “Without application in the real world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge.
Everyone in this world has experienced an ethical dilemma in different situations and this may arise between one or more individuals. Ethical dilemma is a situation where people have to make complex decisions and are influenced based on personal interests, social environment or norms, and religious beliefs (“Strategic Leadership”, n.d.). Leaders and managers in the company should set guidelines to ensure employees are aware and have a better chance to solve and make ethical decisions. Employees are also responsible for understanding their ethical obligations in order to maintain a positive work environment. The purpose of this case study is to identify the dilemma and analyze different decisions to find ways on how a person should act ethically when left with an ethical dilemma.