Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning. Rieber, R.W., & Salzinger, K.D. (1998). Psychology- theoretical-historical perspectives (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
London: Prentice Hall. IbÃ¡Åˆez, T. & ÃÅˆiguez, L. (1997) Critical Social Psychology. London: Sage. Reber, A.S. & Reber, E. (2001). The Penguin Dictionary Of Psychology.
(2003). Wundt, Völkerpsychologie, and experimental social psychology. Hist Psychol, 77-88. Manstead, A., & Hewstone, M. (1996). The Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology.
Hergenhahn, B. R., & Henley, T. B. (2014). An introduction to the history of psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Lubek, I., & Apfelbaum, E. (2000).
London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates BIERHOFF, H. W. (2001). Prosocial Behaviour (Chapter 9). In M. Hewstone & W. Stroebe (Eds. ), Introduction to Psychology (3rd Edn.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
SJT is based on things that are thought about which should or could have happen. This theory is how people judges messages that are received. Individuals either accept or reject the message that is given to see where the attitude outcome will land on the scale of latitude. There are three latitude scales that the idea can be rated on: latitude of acceptance, latitude of rejection and latitude of non-commitment. “Latitude of acceptance is ideas that people see as reasonable or worthy of consideration.
( 1998) The Psychology of the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Lovaglia, M.( 2006) Knowing People: The Personal Use of Social Psychology. 2nd edition. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Burr, V.(2002) The Person in Social Psychology. East Sussex: Psychology Press