Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the endosymbiont theory
the endosymbiont theory
the endosymbiont theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the endosymbiont theory
School of Bioscience
913369293
Alternative Assessment: BI1051 Genetics and Evolution
Question 1
I. Introduction
The two most advanced and scientifically supported hypotheses of evolution from a prokaryote precursor to a eukaryote are The Theories of Endosymbiosis and Autogenesis. The hypotheses both base their claims on the fact that eukaryotic genomes are chimeric, they don’t have a vertical lineage from one common ancestor, but rather a varying ancestry with diverse lineages of archaea and bacteria. Endosymbiosis is the idea that one prokaryotic organism engulfed another which formed a symbiotic relationship between the two, leading to the creation of the eukaryote and its hallmark semi-autonomous organelles (Sagan 1967). Autogenesis is
…show more content…
Mitochondria and chloroplasts are descendants from two separate free-living prokaryotic cells that joined together endosymbiotically (Margulis 1991).There has been some debate on the order of these events and the amount of times an organism undergoes an endosymbiotic event to become a functioning eukaryote (Yonas 2009). According to The Shopping Bag hypothesis, there can be multiple endosymbiotic events occurring until the endosymbiont can successfully survive and thrive in the other cells environment (Howe, 2008). Meaning that the larger heterotrophic prokaryote may have to engulf the endosymbiont multiple times. Each time it adds more and more genetic information from the endosymbiont until the environment is stable enough to support it. There is molecular evidence for this in the form of eukaryotes with more than two subcellular membranes and the retention of bacterial DNA (Allen 2003). The Theory of Autogenesis for eukaryotic cell components, or self-birth, consists of the idea that the cells organelles arose through differentiation and natural evolutionary changes in a single prokaryotic lineage …show more content…
Mitochondria and Chloroplasts do not replicate by mitosis like their eukaryotic counterparts, they replicate using a process very similar to binary fission seen in more recent prokaryotes (Zimorski 2014). All eukaryotes have mitochondria and only plants and algae have a chloroplast, this suggests that The Shopping Bag Theory is correct and that the mitochondria arose from the first endosymbiotic event. Chloroplasts then developed as eukaryotic organisms continued to undergo endosymbiotic events until the environment was stable enough to support life almost six billion years
ABSTRACT: Chloroplasts carry out photosynthetic processes to meet the metabolic demands of plant cells (Alberts, 2008). They consist of an inner thylakoid membrane and a stroma. (Parent et. al, 2008).In this experiment we demonstrate the unique protein compositions of isolated thylakoid and stromal fractions from broken and whole spinach chloroplasts. Because these compartments carry out different metabolic processes, we confirm our hypothesis that performing SDS-PAGE on these fractions will result in distinct patterns on the gels. In isolating and analyzing nucleic acid from broken, whole, and crude chloroplast samples we demonstrate that genes for photosynthetic protein psbA are found in chloroplast DNA, while genes for photosynthetic enzyme
The primordial Soup theory was discovered in 1920. According to the Russian scientist A.I. Oparin and English Geneticist J.B.S. Haldane life started in a warm pond/ocean in a process that took place 3.8 billion years ago. A combination of chemicals made fatty acids which made protein. In this process a molecule was born in the atmosphere. The molecule was energized with lightning and rain making “organic soup”. The first organisms would have to be simple heterotrophs in order to survive.
Carl Woese’s (1990) groundbreaking paper categorised the Tree of Life into three domains for the first time– Archaea, Eubacteria and Eukarya. Before this, Archaea were known as Archaebacteria due to their prokaryotic, single-celled appearance similar to bacteria. However, Woese analysed 16S ribosomal RNA from all three groups and discovered there were differences of such significance in the sequences, for example between positions 180 and 197, that Archaea should be classified as their own domain. The three domains are believed to have separated from one common ancestor, with Eubacteria and Archaea diverging 3.8 billion years ago and Archaea separating from Eukarya 2.8 billion years ago. This means that, despite their appearance, Archaea share more similarities with eukaryotes, such as 33 identical ribosomal proteins, than with bacteria.
As for organisms in the world from humans to the smallest microbe, they directly reflect upon biodiversity, in respect to the appearance, size and expression. The reason behind this is caused by the genetic material found in each and every cell that composes each organism. Given that there are two types of cell organizations found in life, comparison of both ‘eukaryote’ and ‘prokaryote’ genomes will provide a better understanding for such diversity. ‘karyote’ refers to the nucleus, and also ‘pro’ means ‘absence’ and ‘eu’ means ‘presence’. Therefore the words prokaryote and eukaryote reflect upon the individual cell organization. In contrast, the both organizations show discrepancies as well as similarities which ultimately make them unique to one and other.
Eukaryotic cells share several distinguishing features, such as: cytoplasm within specialized organelles such as the mitochondria, chloroplast, the Golgi complex, both a rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum, a nuclear envelope that isolates DNA from the cytoplasm, and a endomembrane system that provides structure and function to the organelles of the cell. Both the mitochondrion and chloroplast are energy transducing organelles, meaning that they transform energy from one form to another, and are believed to be evolved from free living prokaryotes as held by the theory of endosymbiosis. This theory suggests that infolding of the plasma membrane coupled with the absorption of a prokaryotic cells by other prokaryotes could evolve into a later, more complex and specialized type of cell and is proofed by related morphological features such as between cytobacteria and chloroplasts, and between mitochondria and aerobic prokaryotes. Further substantiation includes mitochondria and chloroplasts reproduction through binary fission like prokaryotes, the presence of DNA in both free living prokaryotes and in energy transducing organelles (apart from in the nucleus), protein synthesis and the presence of enzymes and ribosomes where the ribosomes of prokaryotes are comparable to those in mitochondria and chloroplast,
Mitochondria are tiny organelles found in nearly all eukaryotic cells. They are rather large organelles ranging from 0.5µm to 10µm in length and 1µm in diameter. The mitochondria are the energy factories of the cell and are located in the cytoplasm. They are the sites of cellular respiration. The mitochondria are responsible for generating ATP from such organic fuels as simple sugars and fats in the process of cellular respiration. This doubled-membrane organelle has its own DNA and can reproduce by splitting itself.
As the decades pass, technological advances have enabled researchers, entrepenures and pondering minds the ability to discover more and more about every aspect of our very existence. Over the past three decades the evolutionary tree of life has been expanded at least seven times over. Major advances have been made in the area of evolution to open the eyes of many to the extensive history of the earth. For the very first time, we have tangible knowledge that life evolved and grew to become a flourishing success during the young ages of the Earth. By 3.5 million years ago life was already well advanced. Before this breakthrough no one could have thought that life occurred so amazingly early, that Earth was inhabited by a huge array of tiny life forms through t the first four-fifths of it’s existence, and no one deduced that evolution itself evolved over geologic time.
Since the beginning billions of years ago when God reached down and fused the base elements of life into a single-cell organism, that's how long this process has been taking place. As the amoeba of life spread to different parts of a world that was just beginning to take shape, it encountered different challenges for survival, the cells that couldn't survive died and the one or two mutated cells that could survive continued, multiplying and dominating each particular environment.
The successful sequencing of complete genomes has provided us with a virtual map of many organisms (Zhaurova, 2008). This accomplishment should be viewed not as an end in itself, but rather as a starting point for even more research. The future promises more progress in genetics evolutionary biology and in other areas of biology, science, and technology. Armed with accumulating genomic sequences researchers are now trying to unravel some of biology's most complicated processes (NHGRI, 2011), such as uncovering the genomic events that led to the formation of early life and the development of new species (Hudson, 2008). As the complexity and sheer amount of genomic information grows so to will our understanding of the evolution of life on Earth.
According to the theory of evolution, approximately 3.8 billion years ago some chemicals accidentally structured themselves into a self-replicating molecule. This beginning spark of life was the ancestor of every living thing we see today. Through the processes of mutation and natural selection, that simplest life form, has been shaped into every living species.
The semi-alive virus like substances standing between life and non-life could have served as the bridge for the evolutionary passage from non- life to the realms of life. The discovery of biogenetic formation of hydrocarbons and the laboratory synthesis of amino-acids have given some experimental evidence to the hypothesis of the evolutionary origin of life. And with the advance of biochemistry and genetics the hypothesis seems to gain ground. The appearance of life marks a critical point in evolution. Life is not merely matter complicated or the pre-life of minerals just upgraded. There is something “profoundly original about life”
According to Carl Woese, a professor of microbiology at the University of Illinois, eukaryote cells are more structurally complex than those of their prokaryotic counterparts. Eukaryote evolved from prokaryotic cells as they adapted to their environment. Evidence shows that mitochondria, an organelle found in all eukaryotic cells, are actually the product of two independent bacteria’s becoming one. This process is known as endosymbiosis or teamwork. Some evidence supporting the idea of endosymbiosis follows; the chloroplasts and the mitochondria are similar to bacteria in size as well as structure, both mitochondria and chloroplasts contain limited amounts of genetic material which could be from splitting, and both of these organelles are surrounded by a double membrane which suggest that the out membrane may be derived from the engulfing vesicle, and the inner
This organelle is the site of photosynthesis in plants and other organisms. In the structure, the chloroplasts has a double membrane, the outer membrane has a continuous boundary. This organelle can be found in a vast group of organelles called the plastid, chloroplasts are usually found in many plant cells but never in animal cells. Chloroplasts organelles are large; they are 4-10um long and 2-3um wide. They are very important to plants because chloroplasts are what plants use to create food from sunlight. Chloroplasts are not found in humans.
Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) was instituted in the early 1980s as a distinctive field of study to characterise the new synthesis of evolution hypothesis (Müller, 2007). Evo-devo is regarded as a new rule in evolutionary biology and a complement to neo-Darwinian theories. It has formed from the combination of molecular developmental biology and evolutionary molecular genetics; their integration has helped greatly to understand both of these fields. Evo-devo as a discipline has been exploring the role of the process of individual development and the changes in evolutionary phenotype, meaning the developmental procedure by which single-celled zygotes grow to be multicellular organisms. Alterations in the developmental program frequently cause differences in adult morphology. When these alterations are helpful, they grow to be fixed in a population and can result in the evolution of new phyla. Evo-devo seeks to figure out how new groups happen by understanding how the method of development has evolved in different lineages. In other word, evo-devo explains the interaction between phenotype and genotype (Hall, 2007). Explanation of morphological novelty of evolutionary origins is one of the middle challenges in current evolutionary biology, and is intertwined with energetic discussion regarding how to connect developmental biology to standard perspectives from the theory of evolution (Laubichler, 2010). A large amount of theoretical and experiential effort is being devoted to novelties that have challenged biologists for more than one hundred years, for instance, the basis of fins in fish, the fin-to-limb change and the evolution of feathers. The biology of development promises to formulate a main contribution to these...
Francis Crick, co-discoverer of DNA, has said that “the origin of life appears to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have to be satisfied to get it going” (Horgan 27).2 Noted evolutionary astronomer Frederick Hoyle has described the chances of life having evolved from nonlife to be about as likely as the chances that “a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein” (Johnson 106). Why do respected scientists doubt what textbooks teach as fact? It would appear that these scientists know something that current theories describing the origin of life fail to explain. While current theories describe scenarios in which genetic material such as RNA becomes entrapped in a protective cell membrane as a likely recipe for the formation of life, they generally do not focus on the difficulties of forming and concentrating all of these components in the first place.3 To clarify, current theories suffer from what I call the “cookbook mentality.