Themes Of Frankenstein And Samsa

1040 Words3 Pages

Frankenstein and Samsa
Most stories if not all have a moral to learn and many times authors give their characters traits that will allow the audience to understand the concept which they are attempting to convey. Both Franz Kafka and Mary Shelley give their protagonist negative traits that will promote a feeling of antipathy amongst the readers. It is likely that if the reader is able to view and analyze how the character’s negative attitudes greatly affect the plot of the novel they will learn to change their own attitudes if self-identification is achieved thus possibly carrying out the message that the author was attempting to achieve.
In both Frankenstein by Mary Shelley and The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka the reader is presented to a …show more content…

After his mother’s death he became obsessed with occult sciences which is where his inspiration to create the creature came. At first Frankenstein motivated himself by assuming that he would be praised by the new beings which he would create. For example, Victor claims that the he thought that “A new species would bless [him] as its creator and source”(Shelley 25) and this initially motivated him to work to exhaustion. Here the reader can clearly identify that a self-serving attitude is what is driving Frankenstein to work tirelessly. Frankenstein is looking for praise regardless the price and consequences that could follow his attempt to gain admiration. The reader can also identify selfishness from Gregor Samsa though not to the same extent as Frankenstein. Gregor Samsa is selfish not in the sense that he wants to be praised but in the way that he wants to be depended on by his family. Gregor puts himself in a higher position than them subconsciously and assumes that his family must depend on him to survive financially. Though Samsa’s worries may at first appear to the reader as sympathy for his family, Gregor is in fact worried that his family might be able to carry on without him. After the downfall of the Samsa family business Gregor became the sole provider of income in his family and “ he was glad to provide it,” (Kafka 14). Gregor does not want to be forgotten and spends the majority of the …show more content…

“In A Troubled Legacy: Mary Shelley 's Frankenstein and the Inheritance of Human Rights”, writer Diana Reese promotes the idea that Frankenstein through the assassination of his creature would be committing genocide. In general genocide is strongly associated with negative events in history that have created immense pain in those whose cultural group fell victim. Resse states “that by demanding that another of his “species” , The monster announces himself as a member of a species”. By destroying the creatures possible mate, Victor eliminates the chance that the two sole members of that species could reproduce thus leading this new species to extinction. The reader by now understands that the elimination of this creature is Victor’s main goal and if genocide is his main goal he now shows that he has placed himself as a superior with authority to eliminate an entire race. While Victor loses his humanity through the concept of genocide, Gregor is seen as in fact never a physical vermin but as someone who has lost grasp of his humanity. Tom Hartmann in his work “Kafka 's THE METAMORPHOSIS” argues that Gregor’s transformation is not actually a physical one but a mental

Open Document