Theatre in the Community

1434 Words3 Pages

Theatre in the Community

Britain in 1979 was a place of great change and division. Although the

country had united in the election of Margaret Thatcher as the first

Conservative woman Prime minister by the early 1980’s one could say

that the country was spiralling into a state of decline. This was

largely due to the disarray of the previous Labour government and the

implementation of the Conservative government’s robust style of

economic management.

All spheres of social and cultural life were to be judged on their

economic terms and values. This is particularly true within the Arts.

In ‘Politics of Performance’ Baz Kershaw describes how, “Private

enterprise was to replace public dependency, so cuts in government,

expenditure, including that on the arts, were inevitable.” This stems

back largely to the ideological principals of conservatism.

Conservatism believes in the self reliant role of the individual. It

strongly allows for the expansion of public enterprise and thus frowns

upon state intervention and avoids assistance towards public

dependency. Therefore, where it was seen that some areas of public

life, such as the arts, were “financially draining”, cuts were made

where necessary to ensure that funds were spent more wisely, largely

towards benefiting enterprise.

A culmination of activities throughout the 1980’s meant that the arts

were one of the key areas of public life that were disregarded in

favour of prioritised events. This is effectively where the arts began

to suffer. Although some mainstream theatre was funded by the GLC

(Greater London Council), many alternative theatre groups were seen as

unnecessary and as they often highlighted social issues, such as

homosexuality, that were seen as taboo, they were generally avoided

when it came to the distribution of funding. This can clearly be seen

in Kershaw’s, ‘Politics of Performance’, where Kershaw states, “The

divisions in British society were also reflected in the growing

distance between the top and bottom of the theatrical pyramid during

the 1980’s. In 1982 the Royal Shakespeare Company had moved into the

huge concrete edifice of the Barbican in the City of London. The

following year, a government- ordered investigation into the RSC (the

Pristley report) concluded that counter to government suspicions- the

company was efficient but under funded to the ...

... middle of paper ...

...iece was heavily

influenced by the needs of a local disability group.

Community theatres range in size from small groups led by single

individuals performing in borrowed spaces, to large year round

companies with elaborate well equipped theatres of their own. Many

community theatres are successful non-profit businesses with a large

active membership and, in some cases, a full time professional staff.

As the performers and other artists are also involved in other aspects

of their community, non-professional theatre can develop a broad base

of support and attendance among those who might not normally support

the professional arts. Community theatre is in fact well documented as

being the most widely attended venue for theatre in America and

Australia.

Community theatre is often seen as adding to the social capital of a

community, in that it develops skills and community spirit for those

involved. Furthermore, it can also create a place for debate,

self-expression and interactivity that is important for the health of

a community. When this can involve people with learning disabilities,

for example, it can disarm prejudices that people encounter on a daily

basis.

Open Document