Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Urbanization becoming a problem
Mutation genetic drift natural selection
The concept of urbanization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
How will physical and cultural evolution interact in the future?
We have evolved in two ways since hominids first emerged somewhere in Africa two and a half million years ago.
Culturally; we live together in massive populations and interact in a mostly peaceful way. How did we evolve that degree of tolerance? Epidemic disease resistance (physical) promoted city living (cultural) but cities also drove disease resistance. What came first?
Physically; large brains, upright posture, small teeth, delicate features, opposable thumbs and so on. We cannot assign a specific reason why each of these traits evolved and why they came together two hundred thousand years ago.
I will discuss the relationship between cultural and physical evolution in the future. Online interactions already spur commerce, crime, suicide and dating. How will the online world drive cultural and physical evolution? Who will be the winners and losers? What physical traits will be selected for?
Section 1; Cultural evolution
Between the beginning of agriculture in southern Anatolia and the first city in Ur humans went from living in small hunter gatherer bands to cities with tens of thousands of inhabitants. They could not have done this without evolving ways to interact with large numbers of fellow humans. A hunter gatherer tribe would have perhaps two hundred members. Technologically they had no way of extracting enough food and other resources from an area they could traverse in a reasonable time to sustain a larger population. The crucial point would have come in winter when game and food plants were scarce. A larger group would have had to split up.
Because of this group size decisions could have been reached quickly without the necessity of central planning. Any...
... middle of paper ...
... resonance when differences between nations matter less than differences between individuals.
Finally are the cultural and physical traits that will make us successful in the future complementary? We have seen that disease resistance and the ability to interact peacefully have worked with the cultural innovation of living in larger groups. Those same physical traits will also work in conjunction with the development of online culture and city living in a positive feedback loop. Better communication skills give more success economically and socially. Better economic and social status mean people with good communication skills are more likely to pass on their genes; the crucial factor that enabled humans to come together at Gobekli Tepe, and now online, is better communication. Whether cultural or physical whatever promotes this trait will come to dominate our future.
The evolution of man is constantly in question. While we are reasonably sure that modern humans and primates are both related to the same common ancestor, there is constant debate over what initially caused the two species to split into early hominids and apes. According to some, our longest and most popular theory on the division of man and ape is profoundly wrong. However, those same individuals usually offer an equally controversial theory as a substitute, one that is almost impossible to scientifically test or prove. Both the Savanna Theory and the Aquatic Ape Theory offer solutions to how and why humans evolved into bipedal toolmakers. But with enough questioning, each loses its accountability to rhetorical science.
Australopithecus afarensis existed between 3.9 and 3.0 million years ago. The distinctive characteristics of A. afarensis were: a low forehead, a bony ridge over the eyes, a flat nose, no chin, more humanlike teeth, pelvis and leg bones resembled those of modern man. Females were smaller than males. Their sexual dimorphism was males:females; 1.5. A. afarensis was not as sexually dimorphic as gorillas, but more sexually dimorphic than humans or chimpanzees. A lot of scientists think that Australopithecus afarensis was partially adapted to climbing the trees, because the fingers and toe bones of the species were curved and longer than the ones of the modern human.
The evolution of the human species has significantly changed during the course of evolution to what is now the modern day Homo sapiens. Some of the changes that have occurred through the evolution are bipedalism, changes in body features such as brow ridges, and an increase in brain capacity.
Instead of making decisions independently, now people always rely on others, such as groups or computers, to help them make a decision. Small groups often gives people different points of view and let people understand their situation much more clearly. However, these opinions from others may not be suitable for everyone. James Surowiecki uses the story of the Columbia Disaster to discuss efficiency of small groups. In his essay “Committees, Juries, and Teams: The Columbia Disaster and How Small Groups Can Be Made to Work”, Surowiecki tells us how the small groups can work properly instead of making people “dumber”. Even though, the small group contains people with great
Over the years, culture shaped many features of our biological makeup. In turn, biology influenced culture. Because of this, humans are the outcome of everlasting interactions between culture and biology. These interactions are known as biocultural evolution. The study of human evolution involves many scientific disciplines including physical anthropology. Physical anthropology focuses on the interactions between culture and biology which shapes the way we live and interact. Modern humans have different characteristics of physical traits and behaviors. This allows modern humans to interact with each other in di...
Turman, P. (October 13, 2000b). Group Decision Making & Problem Solving: Group Communication [Lecture] Cedar Falls, IA. University of Northern Iowa, Communication Studies Department.
Prior to living in homes build to with stand the test of time, growing food their food source, and raising animals, humans were nomads who followed their food source around and were hunters and gathers. Although it took many years, from 8000B.C. to 3000B.C. for humans to go from hunters and gathers to a more common day life as we now know it, the result is referred to as the Neolithic Revolution the begins of human civilization. As the people of this time began to settle down and they began to both farm the land and domesticate animals for the better of the community. Along with the development of these communities as for the first time began to create social class among the many different roles they played in their community. Because the people of this time no longer roamed around some of the first signs of technology began to appear around this time as well.
“The scientific study of how humans developed did not begin until the 1800s in Europe. Until that time, people relied on religious explanations of how humans came into existence. Starting in the 1500s a scientific revolution began to sweep Europe. Thinkers started using scientific methods and experiments to try to better understand the world and the creatures living in it. Eventually these methods were turned to the question of human origins” (The Nature Of Human Origins, 1). Earth made it possible for species to change over time because Ancient Earth provides ability to plenty of time.The Homo Sapien a is very complex creature. The species started off very simple by living in caves and surviving with little food and then later evolved into a species that were able to do many more complex things. The first species was Sahelanthropus tchadensis They were one of the most simple humans in that time period and on. They had very small skulls compared to Homo Sapiens today and their motor skills were just the same. We have evolved and changed for the better both mentally and physically. The Evolution of Homo Sapiens started off simple, such as the Neanderthals, and now we are the most advanced species to ever walk the planet so far.
When talking about evolution, it is not stating that man comes from monkey but rather that man evolves and adapts to his surroundings and environment due to natural selection. In the days of the cavemen, men were hunting while women were caretakers and cooks. Because men were hunters, they became bigger, faster, and stronger in order to have better skills for hunting which was essential for survival. These men passed down these “dominated traits – some flexibility, an instinctive ability to respo...
... drawn. What makes us human? Through the examination of human evolution, both biological adaptations and cultural adaptations which are distinct to humans can be recognized. Biologically speaking, humans are unique in that they are bipedal, they have larger brain sizes, and longer leg length. When examining the cultural evolution of humans we have a complex language system, we live in communities, engage in symbolic behavior, and act through emotional impulses. While we are often considered to be superior to all other animals, it is important to recognize that while we are animals, we have very distinct characteristics and adaptations that separate us both biologically and culturally from all other animals.
... that areas of expertise can be exploited, different people are good at different things. Groups can discuss material, and that discussion can improve the quality of the decision. Groups are less likely to suffer from judgmental biases that individuals have when they make decisions. People are more likely to follow through on decisions made by groups that they are connected to. Also, more monumental decisions can be made in groups, because one member will not be singled out for blame, making the entire group responsible.
According to the “out of africa” model, “modern humans evolved relatively recently in Africa, migrated into Eurasia and replaced all populations which had descended from Homo erectus” (Stringer). Human’s
The evidence for human evolution begins with the australopithecines. All the australopithecines were bipedal and therefore possible hominines. In details of their teeth, jaws, and brain size, however, they modify enough among themselves to be divided into five species: Australopithecus anamensis, A. afarensis, A. africanus, A. robustus, and A. boisei. Genus Homo are also divided in five different spices: Homo erectus, H. habilis, H. sapiens, and H. sapiens sapiens.
The harsh environment nomads face gradually forced them to discover a much easier lifestyle. And that began the age of Neolithic or the New Stone Age. During the New Stone age people started to settle down and build their own shelters instead of dwelling in caves. Also the once nomads learned how to grow their own food. As a result population grew as life became easier and more bearable.
Formation of groups or teams is not something that occurs overnight. Because it involves human beings that come from various backgrounds with different sets of values, forming a group and anticipating them to integrate and function dynamically cannot be expected to