The Patriot Act The Patriot Act is a bill that was passed in the wake of 9/11/01. Not even two months after the horrific event which we all know as 911, the bill was passed with great haste and secrecy. The bill was passed on October 26, 2001. The bill was passed to raise the security of the country. Sadly many speculate that most of the members in congress did not even read the 342 page bill. Within a matter of days the executive branch with its new powers began to initiate many new executive orders, policies, regulations and practices that many feel threaten our rights. The bill has expanded terrorism laws to include domestic terrorism which subjects political organizations to be surveillance, wiretapping, harassment, and criminal charges for political advocacy. Many feel that this is an attack on the first amendment, which is freedom of religion, speech, assembly and freedom of the press. The bill has also expanded the powers of law enforcement agencies(police, FBI, CIA, NSA). Law enforcement agents now have the ability to conduct secret searches, place telephone and internet surveillance, and can access personal medical, financial, and student records with minimal judicial oversight. Many feel that this is an attack on the fourth am...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the patriot act was passed in the wake of 9/11/01. it was a bill to raise the security of the country.
- Opines that the bill has expanded terrorism laws to include domestic terror, which subjects political organizations to surveillance, wiretapping, harassment, and criminal charges for political advocacy.
- Opines that the bill has expanded the powers of law enforcement agencies, including the ability to conduct secret searches, place telephone and internet surveillance and access personal medical, financial, and student records.
- Explains that the patriot act was passed in the wake of 9/11/01. it was a bill to raise the security of the country.
- Opines that the bill has expanded terrorism laws to include domestic terror, which subjects political organizations to surveillance, wiretapping, harassment, and criminal charges for political advocacy.
- Opines that the bill has expanded the powers of law enforcement agencies, including the ability to conduct secret searches, place telephone and internet surveillance and access personal medical, financial, and student records.
- Explains that fbi agents can now investigate american citizens for criminal matters without probable cause, as long as they say it is for intelligence purposes, and arrest non-citizens on mere suspicion alone. this goes against the fifth amendment.
- Explains that suspects can be detained indefinitely in six months increments without any real judicial review. this goes against the first, fifth, and fourteenth amendments.
- Opines that they are against this bill and that the executive branch's powers have been used for evil.
- Analyzes how the executive branch is breaking the rights of people on a large scale. 8,000 arabic and south asian immigrants have been interrogated because of their religion and ethnic background.
- Opines that with all the bad things the executive branch has done because of this bill, it is impossible for them to be for it. the government is supposedly doing this to save the lives of thousands, by catching terrorists and preventing any further attacks.
Harness the Power of AI to Boost Your Grades!
Haven't found what you were looking for? Talk to me, I can help!
Related
- analytical
- explanatory
- opinion
- Patriot Act Essayanalytical essaySeptember 11th 2001 was not only the day when the delicate facade of American security was shattered, but it was also the events of this day that led to the violation of the rights of millions of American citizens. After relentless reprehension by the American masses on the approach that was taken after the 9/11 attacks ,the Bush administration enacted the Patriot Act on October 26th, 2001, a mere 56 days after this tragic event.The Patriot Act expanded the authority of U.S. law enforcement agencies so that they could hopefully avert future terrorist attacks. Under the Patriot Act The NSA (National Security Agency) could entrench upon the privacy of the citizens of the U.S. without public knowledge, consent or, probable cause. The particular incident which had the general public up at arms was when the NSA illicit surveillance came to public knowledge.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the patriot act expanded ity of u.s. law enforcement agencies so that they could hopefully avert future terrorist attacks.
- Explains that the nsa has been monitoring the cyber world and telephone activity of american citizens, as well as foreign nationals in secrecy.
- Explains that the 4th amendment was originally intended for colonial resistance to the english system of general warrants, or writs of assistance.
- Explains that the patriot act expanded ity of u.s. law enforcement agencies so that they could hopefully avert future terrorist attacks.
- Explains that the nsa has been monitoring the cyber world and telephone activity of american citizens, as well as foreign nationals in secrecy.
- Explains that the 4th amendment was originally intended for colonial resistance to the english system of general warrants, or writs of assistance.
- Analyzes how the supreme court's interpretation of the fourth amendment has brought many expansions and transmutes to its powers since its inception.
843 wordsRead More - The Patriot Actanalytical essayAfter the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 our country underwent a change that has drastically affected the fundamental values that our founding fathers instilled in this country. Since that tragic day in September the aftermath of the attacks has started to implicate our Civil Liberties that in this country we hold so dear. Just 45 days after the September 11 attacks, with virtually no debate, Congress passed the USA Patriot Act on October 5th, 2001. This act expanded the surveillance powers of domestic law enforcement and international intelligence agencies. The controversy that must be discussed is whether or not this legislation fully or in part has violated the Constitution and/or endangered our civil liberties in any way. John Kerry former presidential candidate is opposed to the patriot act stating ?We are a nation of laws and liberties, not of a knock in the night. So it is time to end the era of John Ashcroft. That starts with replacing the Patriot Act with a new law that protects our people and our liberties at the same time.? John Kerry is right in suggesting that the patriot act is thinning our freedoms. Those who feel the patriot act is going to protect us from harm fail to see the dark side of the legislation which is relinquishing us of our rights guaranteed to us in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the usa patriot act, which expanded surveillance powers of domestic law enforcement and international intelligence agencies, violated the constitution and endangered our civil liberties.
- Describes the usa patriot act, a us legislative law enacted in response to the september 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
- Analyzes how malkin's support of the act is based on the fact that it revised outdated rules that fatally hampered surveillance of suspected terrorists in america, and implemented a federal program to register and track non-immigrant visitors from high-risk middle eastern countries.
- Opines that the usa patriot act, which expanded surveillance powers of domestic law enforcement and international intelligence agencies, violated the constitution and endangered our civil liberties.
- Describes the usa patriot act, a us legislative law enacted in response to the september 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.
- Analyzes how malkin's support of the act is based on the fact that it revised outdated rules that fatally hampered surveillance of suspected terrorists in america, and implemented a federal program to register and track non-immigrant visitors from high-risk middle eastern countries.
- Argues that the usa patriot act is unethical because it hampers our civil liberties. deontology states that an act so as to treat humanity as an end and never as a means only.
- Analyzes how malkin's ethical stance can be seen as a utilitarian one. the patriot act is in conformity with the principle of utility.
- Opines that the usa patriot act threatens our civil liberties by allowing increased information sharing between domestic law enforcement and intelligence.
1695 wordsRead More - Homeland Security Essayexplanatory essayThe USA PATRIOT Act is a law passed shortly after terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The acts on September 11th showed a great need to improve our Homeland security system as a whole. It showed that we as a country were far from impenetrable and raised the flags to help lawmakers decide that more needed to be done to better protect the individual living in the United States. The next question is how as a nation can we protect the citizens of our country better, the Bush Administration soon passed the USA PATRIOT Act. The goals of the USA PATRIOT Act are to make security on the home front stronger along with making the powers of the police stronger when it comes to finding and identifying terrorists within the United States. The definition of terrorism as defined by the FBI is that “"International terrorism" is any activities with the following three characteristics, Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law; Appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that homeland security has become more than an objective within the scope of the mission of law enforcement. the terrorist attacks on september 11th, 2001, have changed how law enforcement works and created new jobs.
- Explains that the usa patriot act is a law passed shortly after the terrorist attacks on september 11, 2001. the goal is to make security on the home front stronger and the powers of the police stronger when it comes to finding and identifying terrorists.
- Explains how the patriot act and the agencies within the dhs are attempting to keep up with terrorist tactics. terrorists use chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive weapons.
- Explains that homeland security has become more than an objective within the scope of the mission of law enforcement. the terrorist attacks on september 11th, 2001, have changed how law enforcement works and created new jobs.
- Explains that the usa patriot act is a law passed shortly after the terrorist attacks on september 11, 2001. the goal is to make security on the home front stronger and the powers of the police stronger when it comes to finding and identifying terrorists.
- Explains how the patriot act and the agencies within the dhs are attempting to keep up with terrorist tactics. terrorists use chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive weapons.
- Explains the divisions within the nypd, such as the technology and construction section, the threat reduction infrastructure protection section (trips), the maritime team and the emergency preparedness and exercise section.
- Explains that the patriot act helped mother the creation of the department of homeland security.
- Explains how the tsa stops terrorists from traveling through the immigration advisory program, which places u.s. customs and border protection officers at foreign airports.
- Explains that the u.s. customs and border protection agency is responsible for ensuring that everything entering and entering is legal and not carrying anything illegal and complies with all border laws.
- Explains that the usa patriot act has been controversial since its creation. it has helped find new threats within the scope of terrorism and immigration.
1758 wordsRead More - The USA Patriot Act and Civil Libertiesanalytical essaySeptember 11, 2001 sparked many different feelings into the hearts of Americans. People sprang into action to seek revenge and protect America’s precious soils from another deadly attack by reinforcing America’s strength through her government. The men and women of Congress retaliated to the terrorist attacks by drafting and passing the USA PATRIOT Act on October 26, 2001, which stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.” The bill was moved through Congress with amazing speed and little hesitation. After the passing, the unsuspecting citizens of America were bombarded with many new rules and regulations that have greatly become a threat to the civil liberties, and the First Amendment itself. The people of America have planned out different ways to comply and/or soften the PATRIOT Act. The American Library Association, Senator Feingold, Firstlogic Financial Advisors, and the House of Representatives have taken steps to aid America in retrieving her freedom. Obviously, some of these sources are really passionate about totally wiping out the sections that deal with them, while others are just trying to soften the sections that pertain to them.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the usa patriot act retaliated to the terrorist attacks by drafting and passing the bill with amazing speed and little hesitation.
- Analyzes how the american library association has taken drastic measures to erase sections devoted to monitoring library activity in the patriot act.
- Explains that the library, bookseller, and personal records privacy act complies with the governments new restrictions, but sets a limit of its own.
- Analyzes how the usa patriot act retaliated to the terrorist attacks by drafting and passing the bill with amazing speed and little hesitation.
- Analyzes how the american library association has taken drastic measures to erase sections devoted to monitoring library activity in the patriot act.
- Explains that the library, bookseller, and personal records privacy act complies with the governments new restrictions, but sets a limit of its own.
- Explains that firstlogic financial analysts have maneuvered through the patriot act to get the very best possibilities available for their customers. their compliance solution allows companies to identify, compare and track client records against known subjects on the ofac specially designated nations (sdn) and block persons.
- Explains that congressman and congresswomen of the house of representatives are looking into the patriot act and trying to distinguish the most logical solution. the otter amendment seems to be their idea of a solution
- Argues that the fsma's argument for creating something so dominating is that this system creates unification which addresses the problems of new technology.
1257 wordsRead More - The Patriot Act: Trampling on the Bill of Rightsopinion essaySeveral weeks after the horrible terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act was rushed through Congress by Attorney General, John Ashcroft. This particular Act, however, was established with a ruling hand of fear. Life for Americans changed dramatically in those immediate days, weeks, and months after the attack. America had been spoiled with luxury for so long, that the illusion of control had ingrained itself into our very nature as Americans. That act of terror, on September 11, 2001, brought that belief crashing down, almost immediately. Fear and anger were rampant though out America; a dangerous combination when it comes to charging out a Congressional bill. The scariest parts of The USA PATRIOT ACT, in my opinion, are not just the arguably unconstitutional sections proposed in the Act, but the timing and expedition of legislation. To propose a bill that remained indifferent in regards to sacrificing civil liberties for the sake of enhanced security. The Bill was voted in with near unanimity, 98-1 in the Senate and 357-66 in the House of Representatives near after. Considering the margins of the votes, it makes one wonder if anyone in Congress even bothered to read the bill. Perhaps a good portion of our legislators were fearful to look unpatriotic, by objecting a radical bill dubbed The USA PATRIOT Act. As an old phrase goes, the nail that stands-out, gets hammered. The congressional legislative process is supposed to be deliberately slow; ensuring that what is proposed is in fact constitutional. One of the more serious issues with the USA PATRIOT Act, is the ambiguity of crucia...
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the usa patriot act was rushed through congress by attorney general john ashcroft, but was established with a ruling hand of fear.
- Analyzes how section 215 in the usa patriot act is one of the more critically addressed problems of this already controversial piece of legislation.
- Opines that the constitution was meant to be more organic and less bureaucratic. the usa patriot act amends the foreign intelligence surveillance act (fisa).
- Analyzes how the usa patriot act was rushed through congress by attorney general john ashcroft, but was established with a ruling hand of fear.
- Analyzes how section 215 in the usa patriot act is one of the more critically addressed problems of this already controversial piece of legislation.
- Opines that the constitution was meant to be more organic and less bureaucratic. the usa patriot act amends the foreign intelligence surveillance act (fisa).
- Opines that such powerful changes in law should never be taken lightly, especially when they trample on civil liberties guaranteed to each citizen. john ashcroft and george w. bush both seemed bent on a crusade of revenge, at whatever cost.
- Opines that john ashcroft's patriot act is constitutional, and that he is either virtuous or blind to the potential erosion of civil liberties.
- Explains that russ feingold, a democrat senator from wisconsin, was the only member of the senate to vote against the usa patriot act.
- Explains how the usa patriot act was introduced to the house, where it was approved by the yeas and nays.
- Opines that americans should take a deeper look at the importance of the bill of rights.
2024 wordsRead More - The Patriot Act Infringes on American Freedomopinion essayThe most powerful, and therefore the most controversial, legislation passed by Congress was the U.S. Patriot Act. It was passed on October 26, 2001, and it is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (Fahrenheit 9/11). It is composed of over 1,000 sections giving the government many new powers that they’ve utilized before in other wartime situations (Lithwick). However, with the war on terrorism Americans are not fighting a clear cut “enemy” and there is no foreseeable end for this war in the near future. Once the immediate fear of another attack calmed down around the nation, people began to realize the rights they were losing to the government that were once granted to them by our founding fathers in the Constitution (Townshend).
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the patriot act infringes on american freedom. the news of the planes hitting the twin towers drove fear into the hearts of all americans.
- Explains that the u.s. patriot act was the most powerful, and controversial, legislation passed by congress on october 26, 2001.
- Opines that the patriot act infringes on the rights of the american people because freedom of information act requests have been half answered and judiciary committee queries are blown off or classified.
- Analyzes how the patriot act infringes on american freedom. the news of the planes hitting the twin towers drove fear into the hearts of all americans.
- Explains that the u.s. patriot act was the most powerful, and controversial, legislation passed by congress on october 26, 2001.
- Opines that the patriot act infringes on the rights of the american people because freedom of information act requests have been half answered and judiciary committee queries are blown off or classified.
- Explains that anti-patriot act legislation is being passed around america. 330 communities in 41 states have passed resolutions condemning the patriot act, meaning that city employees in these areas do not have to cooperate with the government on the sections of the act that violate their citizen's constitutional rights.
- Opines that the patriot act dips into the freedoms once allowed in our nation. is it the excuse the government has been waiting for to have public support for spying on its citizens?
- Cites egan, timothy, and townshend, mike, in "state of the union: opposing the patriot act."
755 wordsRead More - The Patriot Act: Keeping America Safeopinion essayThe Act was approved by both the House of Representatives and Senate with very little opposition and was signed into law by President George W. Bush. This new act significantly cut restrictions on judicial power and gave legal authorities more control. Since its passage, the Patriot Act has been under severe scrutiny and has been considered one the most controversial acts passed under the American government. Most adversaries have critiqued the act by claiming that it is unconstitutional and infringes upon citizens’ rights. Accusations of the Patriot Act’s violations against the First and Four Amendments have been ongoing, despite several amendments to it. Opponents have asserted that the Act opens a door for potential governmental abuses of power, while supporters have maintained that it is not only constitutional but necessary, given the context of terror in today’s society. While there are some who claim that the USA PATRIOT Act breaches American citizens’ constitutionally guaranteed rights and poses potential abuses of power, the act is clearly a carefully constru...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the united states was shaken when the twin towers of the world trade center fell and thousands were killed. the government had to find out why this atrocity had happened, and stop it from happening again.
- Explains that the usa patriot act was approved by both the house of representatives and senate with very little opposition and was signed into law by president george w. bush.
- Explains that before september 11, terrorism concerned many people, but it didn't seem a personal threat to the citizens of the united states. the government and its citizens were largely unaware of al qaeda, to which the attacks were later linked.
- Explains that the united states was shaken when the twin towers of the world trade center fell and thousands were killed. the government had to find out why this atrocity had happened, and stop it from happening again.
- Explains that the usa patriot act was approved by both the house of representatives and senate with very little opposition and was signed into law by president george w. bush.
- Explains that before september 11, terrorism concerned many people, but it didn't seem a personal threat to the citizens of the united states. the government and its citizens were largely unaware of al qaeda, to which the attacks were later linked.
- Opines that if the government exercised more authority, the bombings could have been stopped.
- Describes how the justice department drafted a new law to prevent the twin towers from happening again. the usa patriot act cut restrictions and limitations on the judicial branch, allowing officials to father information more effectively.
- Analyzes how the patriot act became a debate over national security versus individual liberties.
- Explains that section 215 of the patriot act allows law officials to search and seize library records without informing the suspected terrorist.
- Explains that the first amendment does not protect a person's speech if the "gag order" keeps national security and is the least they can do to protect.
- Explains that the supreme court allows such searches because informing the suspect that he is under surveillance gives him the opportunity to hide any incriminating evidence, alert his partners, rush the plan, or flee the country.
- Opines that the patriot act violates the fourth amendment, which states, "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, shall not be violated."
- Explains that the patriot act's articles on electronic investigation are amendments to existing laws. the fisa foreign intelligence surveillance act allowed authorities to use wiretaps and other investigative tools on one stationary phone.
- Argues that the patriot act infringes upon the fourth amendment rights through the slackened restrictions on searches through personal property.
- Opines that the usa patriot act is a constitutional bill that promises to keep america safe from terrorist attacks.
- Explains that freedom of speech and press: exceptions to the first amendment.
1924 wordsRead More - The USA Patriot Actexplanatory essayThe United States of America is a country that is based upon a principle of balancing the rights of an individual, while still preserving public order. The U.S. Constitution (specifically the Bill of Rights) guarantees every American certain Individual rights. Some of these rights include; freedom from unreasonable search and seizures, a right to due process of law, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment (The 4th, 5th and 8th Amendments). Historically the criminal justice system has preserved these rights of peopled accused of crimes. However on September 11, 2001, the United States became the victim of the largest terrorist attack the World has ever seen. According to Schmalleger in 2003, that attack cost almost three thousand people their lives, and an estimated two trillion dollars in damages. However since September 11 2001, several critics have claimed that the United States of America no longer protects these rights. They argue that the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001, violates the rights of suspected terrorists, and those of every single American. Supporters of the USA PATRIOT Act argue that the bill has been vital in arresting suspected terrorists, and it has helped deter future terrorist attacks.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the united states of america is based on a principle of balancing the rights of an individual, while still preserving public order.
- Summarizes the usa patriot act, a federal law enacted in response to terrorist attacks on the world trade center and the pentagon.
- Explains that the usa patriot act allows for a better sharing of information among the different divisions of federal, state and local law enforcement.
- Explains that the united states of america is based on a principle of balancing the rights of an individual, while still preserving public order.
- Summarizes the usa patriot act, a federal law enacted in response to terrorist attacks on the world trade center and the pentagon.
- Explains that the usa patriot act allows for a better sharing of information among the different divisions of federal, state and local law enforcement.
- Explains that section 219 of the usa patriot act is a very important tool for investigations suspected terrorist activities.
- Explains that the usa patriot act authorizes the use of pen registers and trap and trace devices in investigating criminal activity.
- Explains the main criticisms of the usa patriot act, including the invasion of privacy of citizens, and the allegations of abuse of people detained as suspected terrorists.
- Explains that the usa patriot act is being criticized for violating the rights of immigrants, and accusations of abuse of people detained as suspected terrorists.
- Reports that the usa patriot act has been successful in investigating and arresting suspected terrorists, and it has also been credited by top federal law enforcement officials as preventing further terrorist attacks.
- Explains that the usa patriot act does not violate any constitutional rights; it allows law enforcement an effective means of gathering information.
- Argues that the usa patriot act is an invasion of privacy. preventing another tragedy of the magnitude is for more important the loss of individual rights.
- Opines that the criticism of the usa patriot act, by the public and by aclu, must not undermine the incredible importance of this legislation.
2686 wordsRead More - Essay On The Patriot Actanalytical essayAfter the September 11th terrorist attack on the World Trade Centre by the Islamic radical group al-Qaeda and the 2001 Anthrax attacks on two senators and several news media offices, congress rushed to pass the USA Patriot Act, which roughly is an Act to deter and punish acts of terrorism in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes. After these unrelated terrorist attacks happened within weeks of each other congress knew reform legislature was needed. Many Historians such as Brett Rubio believe that the USA Patriot Act infringed upon American’s civil liberties while the U.S. Government more specifically the Justice Department believed it was necessary course of action to prevent future acts of terrorism. The Patriot Act was put in place in order to allow the Department of Justice to foil terrorist attacks following September 11th and anthrax attack, but the act is at the expense of American’s civil liberties such as invasion of privacy and racial profiling Arab and Muslim people.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the usa patriot act was passed to deter and punish terrorist attacks in the united states and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes.
- Explains that the patriot act has been praised by the fbi and other department of justice agencies for its ability to assist investigations and prevent terrorism.
- Analyzes how the patriot act has increased the spread of racial profiling in our country against arabs and muslims.
- Explains that the usa patriot act was passed to deter and punish terrorist attacks in the united states and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes.
- Explains that the patriot act has been praised by the fbi and other department of justice agencies for its ability to assist investigations and prevent terrorism.
- Analyzes how the patriot act has increased the spread of racial profiling in our country against arabs and muslims.
- Opines that the patriot act is justified and our rights of privacy are not being violated. the boston marathon bombing is the biggest act of terror on american soil since september 11th.
- Explains that the patriot act allows the department of justice to fight terrorism with 21st-century tools, such as roving wiretaps and court-ordered pen registers.
1260 wordsRead More - No Online Privacy in Americaopinion essayThe Patriot Act is complex and powerful. It broadens the definition of terrorism and increases the penalties for terrorism.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the march of technology makes an encompassing surveillance network seem almost inevitable. we owe much of our privacy to immature technology and insufficient manpower to monitor us.
- Explains that cameras, microphones, and biological sensors are being connected through increasingly efficient networks to increasingly powerful data processing and storage. face and voice recognition software may soon permit image data from surveillance cameras to be cross-referenced
- Opines that we are moving toward a transparent society in which our actions and transactions are followed, our lives tracked and documented, by folks we neither know nor trust.
- Explains that the march of technology makes an encompassing surveillance network seem almost inevitable. we owe much of our privacy to immature technology and insufficient manpower to monitor us.
- Explains that cameras, microphones, and biological sensors are being connected through increasingly efficient networks to increasingly powerful data processing and storage. face and voice recognition software may soon permit image data from surveillance cameras to be cross-referenced
- Opines that we are moving toward a transparent society in which our actions and transactions are followed, our lives tracked and documented, by folks we neither know nor trust.
- Explains that the usa patriot act gives investigators more tools for apprehending terrorists. proponents of the law say they need it to protect themselves, while opponents say it threatens our constitutional rights.
- Explains that the patriot act is complex and powerful. it broadens the definition of terrorism and increases the penalties. the act permits federal investigators to use more-powerful tools to monitor phone calls, e-mail messages, and web surfing.
- Opines that the patriot act is vague on many key points and law enforcement officials are not eager to reveal details about tools like the controversial internet surveillance system, carnivore and the magic lantern.
- Explains that the new law opens the door for increased use of tools like magic lantern and carnivore and similar broad-based electronic surveillance systems.
- Compares the fbi's magic lantern technology and carnivore, which is a high-speed packet "sniffer" program.
- Explains that the patriotic act loosens the rules for roving wiretaps, conferring broad authority to listen in on a suspect's communications.
- Argues that the fbi's use of a system like carnivore and magic lantern is unconstitutional, and the 4th amendment prohibits such sweeping invasions of privacy and property.
- Opines that the best thing about the internet is its lack of centralized control. it would be a far worse consequence to give up the "chaos" in favor of stringent control, at the expense of freedoms.
- Analyzes how the carnivore and magic lantern system plants the seeds for all kinds of developments.
- Explains that magic lantern and carnivore will harm innocent people. the guesswork involved in a sweeping search like these insures that many "dead ends" will be pursued.
- Opines that carnivore is the most severe threat yet to our information age. its implementation sets the stage for government to have a disturbing role in our society.
- Analyzes how new technologies, laws threaten privacy, and national security vs. online privacy.
1596 wordsRead More - What Is Homeland Security?explanatory essayThe PATRIOT Act is a law passed shortly after terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The acts on September 11th showed a great need to improve our Homeland security system as a whole. It showed that we as a country were far from impenetrable and raised the flags to help lawmakers decide that more needed to be done to better protect the individual living in the United States. The next question is how as a nation can we protect the citizens of our country better, the Bush Administration soon passed the PATRIOT Act. The goals of the PATRIOT Act are to make security on the home front stronger along with making the powers of the police stronger when it comes to finding and identifying terrorists within the U.S.. Since its creation, th...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that homeland security has become more than an objective within the scope of the mission of law enforcement. the terrorist attacks on september 11th, 2001, have changed how law enforcement works and created new jobs.
- Explains that the patriot act is a law passed shortly after the terrorist attacks on september 11, 2001.
- Explains that the patriot act helped mother the creation of the department of homeland security.
- Explains that homeland security has become more than an objective within the scope of the mission of law enforcement. the terrorist attacks on september 11th, 2001, have changed how law enforcement works and created new jobs.
- Explains that the patriot act is a law passed shortly after the terrorist attacks on september 11, 2001.
- Explains that the patriot act helped mother the creation of the department of homeland security.
- Explains that the tsa helps enforce flight safety by improving baggage screening. border patrol and customs officers have expanded rights since the patriot act and the dhs.
623 wordsRead More - april 19analytical essay“"The Patriot Act did two things to correct major weaknesses in our nation's pre-Sept. 11, 2001, defenses. First, it lowered the bureaucratic and legal wall that had prevented law enforcement and the intelligence community from sharing information with each other about terrorist operatives and plans. ”
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the patriot act established standards in oversight for the use of the act's provisions.
- Explains that the patriot act allows investigators to use the tools that were already available to investigate organized crime and drug trafficking.
- States that every usa patriot act provision that allows compulsory collection of records or searches of suspects requires the approval of a federal judge. there are no exceptions.
- Explains that the patriot act established standards in oversight for the use of the act's provisions.
- Explains that the patriot act allows investigators to use the tools that were already available to investigate organized crime and drug trafficking.
- States that every usa patriot act provision that allows compulsory collection of records or searches of suspects requires the approval of a federal judge. there are no exceptions.
- Analyzes how the patriot act lowered the bureaucratic and legal wall that prevented law enforcement and the intelligence community from sharing information about terrorist operatives and plans.
- Analyzes how the patriot act broke down the "wall" that separated law enforcement and intelligence investigations. the 9/11 commission cited that wall as a central failing in our national security preparedness.
- Analyzes how the chicago tribune columnist steve chapman sets the record straight on the use of the patriot act as a vital tool used in law enforcement's fight against terrorism.
- Quotes senator kyl's op-ed in the coolidge examiner about the importance of renewing all sunset provisions of the patriot act. the act broke down the historical wall between traditional criminal and intelligence-related investigations.
670 wordsRead More - The Patriot Act Protects Americaexplanatory essayThe U.S. Patriot Act was set in place to better serve our country against terrorism. The U.S. Patriot Act is an Acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Acts (Lithwick). This act is to punish terrorist actions and improve law enforcement not only in the United States but also around the world. The United States Patriot Act consists of over 1,000 sections that describe the act in great detail. The sections include, but are not limited to, the power extended to the government by The U.S. Patriot Act to deport and incarcerate non citizens. With the U.S. Patriot Act a person’s phone line can be tapped, records of any and all purchases checked, and even library records searched. This Act also has sections to help money laundering, expand our country’s border protection, strengthening the extent of criminal laws and provide for people suffering from any type of terrorism acts (Huffman).
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the united states patriot act is one of the laws passed after 9/11: singed into order on october 26, 2001 just 45 days after the attack.
- Explains that the u.s. patriot act is an acronym for uniting and strengthening america by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism acts.
- Explains that some americans think the u.s. patriot act goes against american’s civil liberties due to unnecessary searches that are condoned by the act.
- Explains that the united states patriot act is one of the laws passed after 9/11: singed into order on october 26, 2001 just 45 days after the attack.
- Explains that the u.s. patriot act is an acronym for uniting and strengthening america by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism acts.
- Explains that some americans think the u.s. patriot act goes against american’s civil liberties due to unnecessary searches that are condoned by the act.
- Explains that the united states patriot act has increased funding for the federal bureau of investigation and counter terrorism funds. the expansion of national electronic crime task force has also been improved.
- Explains that without the united states patriot act people will still fear terrorism. the government can help make laws to prevent it.
- Cites huffman, ryan, david lloyd, and jason pollard. pros of the patriot act. 2001. keen, judy.
761 wordsRead More