preview

The Wealth of Nations: A Revolutionary Work on Economics

analytical Essay
1342 words
1342 words
bookmark

Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations is one of history’s most revolutionary works on economics, with basic principals that remain applicable to today’s business world.

Smith wrote it in an effort to transform the way Europeans created and sold products and to promote the concept of a free market. The book was a catalyst for change, quickly spreading throughout the world new and revolutionary ways to improve the financial systems of Europe by making them more productive. It promoted the concept of specializing in products that are conducive to the resources and skills of a country. This period, known as the Industrial and Agricultural Revolution, was marked by an economy that had both positive and negative aspects.

The Industrial Revolution did lead to some good, such as a longer life expectancy and new technology. It also led to some changes that Smith did not anticipate, such as the rise of the Bourgeoisie as a main power, extremely poor living conditions for the working class, and horrific labor conditions for women and children.

As The Wealth of Nations grew in popularity, the Industrial Revolution began to take shape. Smith’s idea of an assembly line led to the creation of factories, or actual buildings used only for the task of production. This replaced the use of homes as a setting for work, freeing up homes to serve solely as the living quarters of the family. At the time of the Industrial Revolution, the only way to power these factories was by water power or the burning of coal. Because the sources of power were so limited, mills were built only in the rural areas in order to be close to power sources, such as rivers or coal mines (Engels: Industrial Manchester, 1).

What did this lead to? Factories and m...

... middle of paper ...

...isie and the creation of monopolies. Unlike aristocrats, who seemed to work together to make sure they all had wealth, the bourgeoisie fiercely competed with each other. Employers, as stated earlier, gave the workers next to no salary. They understood that lowering their prices by lowering wages was the best way to compete with each other. They also began to incorporate the idea of monopolies, which put all new or small business owners out of work and made entrepreneurship very difficult.

Overall, Smith could not have foreseen the many effects that occurred after The Wealth of Nations was published. He mainly focused on how the manufacturers of factories would “ destined to supply the great wants of the great body of the people.” The good of his work really does outweigh the harmful effects of the revolution.

Works Cited

Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that adam smith's the wealth of nations was a catalyst for change, spreading throughout the world new and revolutionary ways to improve the financial systems of europe.
  • Opines that the industrial revolution led to some good, such as a longer life expectancy and new technology, but also to changes that smith did not anticipate.
  • Explains that smith's idea of an assembly line led to the creation of factories, or actual buildings used only for the task of production. the only way to power these factories was by water power or the burning of coal.
  • Explains how the city of manchester became an industrial mecca, due to its perfect conditions for cloth manufacturing. due to overpopulation, the working class had essentially no space in which to live.
  • Explains that these buildings were what we today would envision in third-world countries. they had dirt floors, were used as pigpens, and were filled with stagnant urine and excrement.
  • Explains that smith's the wealth of nations was a roadmap for progress, but he did not advocate the resulting use of child labor. the workday was monday through saturday and sometimes even on the sabbath day.
  • Explains that children worked tirelessly for hours and were granted a brief break to eat lunch. after this, they continued their fourteen- to sixteen-hour shifts until they were finally released for the day.
  • Explains that poor children were forced to work on the machines in the factories that smith had championed in his writing.
  • Analyzes how the sadler report proves that the horrid sanitation wasn't the working class' only problem. although the industrial revolution was supposed to spell progress, working conditions were worse than what the workers' ancestors had experienced.
  • Explains that families felt pressured to sell their children to factory owners for just a few shillings per year. the little money they received helped them afford food for their family.
  • Explains that the industrial revolution led to the final triumph of the bourgeoisie over aristocrats and proletariat.
  • Explains that the industrial revolution led to the major source of power and income switching from ownership of land to control of capital or jurisdiction over the proletariat laborers.
  • Analyzes how clausewitz said that policy is interwoven with the whole action of war, and must exercise a continuous influence upon it. king louis xvi was indebted to many of the bourgeoisie.
  • Explains that smith probably did not anticipate the extreme competition between the bourgeoisie and the creation of monopolies.
  • Analyzes how smith could not have foreseen the many effects that occurred after the wealth of nations was published. the good of his work really outweighs the harmful effects of the revolution.
Get Access