Throughout history, suicide has created a wide variety of feelings amongst people. As of today the topic of suicide has been questioned by many people who ponder to themselves if suicides is a necessary tool in order for society to strive. There are also many groups of religions and groups in society that believe in letting people kill themselves is immoral and they will find themselves in Hell or other places due to how it weakens the human as a whole. Many institutions of many religions, people of all sorts, and many others all now a day it have their own beliefs of suicide in which they have all come to a reasonable conclusion of sort. With that being said, the topic of assisted suicides originated from the topic of suicide, in which has created a major divide among the people as to whether or not it should be allowed. The way at which these people view assisted suicides it important in that it decreases the value of life. Life as we know it is very delicate in which there is a process that we all go through. We start with birth, simple, and death, complex. Death can be considered to be complex in that there are multiple ways to die, or somehow cheat the normal way of death. People either naturally die or they die with the help of somebody or by themselves. Either way death in itself is complicated. We can't all life forever, in which sometimes we become so sick that we just sit down waiting for our eventual demise, however sometimes it takes forever for use to die. Speeding up this natural death is what many people hope to accomplish through various methods. Through the help of the doctors, these patients take their own life or they resort to assisted suicides. Whenever there has been an option as to getting out of hard sit...
... middle of paper ...
...ll of these responsibilities. However in allowing a person to die at their own hands points how one cannot truly become as god as long as there are many problems in society. In trying to be that of the same with god, it decreases the value of life in that if these doctors are aiming to become god, then there creates a false identity in society in which there are many people who instead of trying to help these people, they transcend to become something greater hence being ignorant to the sickened, hence to the value of life. This image of a false god is important in that it is a paradox. The doctors are in a loop hole in which they are in a paradox that they cannot escape. In living in this sort of paradox, there is a lot of pressure that is created by from religions, and their perspective of killing people, and the people who want legislative rights on this matter.
In conclusion, assisted suicide will always be a controversial subject whether you feel it is right or wrong. Some will agree others won't, which makes it much like abortion. As time goes by more and more are opening up to the idea of abortion a lot like what is going to happen with assisted suicide. More states will make it legal and eventually people will get used to the idea of a doctor helping someone end their own life. It may or may not be right but, in the end a person has there own brain and body. They get to decide what they want to do with both and no one can stop them but themselves. If assisted suicide really bothered the nation that much we would see more of an effort to get suicidal people under control and get them the help they need. One day, hopefully soon, where someone will stand up and take charge.
Assisted suicide is becoming increasingly more common. Arguing the topic is extremely hard because it means the the life or death of a human being. Today, assisted suicide is legal in multiple countries, but only a few states in the US support this. Therefore, creates a struggle for any person wanting to go through this process. Being this is a broad topic, most people are torn between one side, I personally believe there should be a compromise in between the middle. For instance, not just someone going through a troublesome time in their life should have the ability to up and kill himself. That in my perspective is taking an easy way out for something that is worth a tremendous amount. However, the few people with a deadly illness or cancer that can no longer fight the pain or perhaps unresponsive should be given that option. Just because we have the ability to be euthanized does
During the time of chaos and confusion, doctors are expected to find the best solution for the patients. As a consequence, the staff chooses to kill the patients “calmly” to reduced the factors that puts a strain on themselves and on the patients. Doctor Cook never once said that they chose the very last option possible, because if that was the case, the doctors would have made a call for additional volunteer recusers until conformation that no rescuers and no outside assistants were left to assure that the patients in the category five condition have a fair chance of survival. Often times, a hospital can testify that most patients have had harsher conditions that put them at near death, but after care and time, those patients have had speedy recoveries and went on to live normal lives. The doctors were in observation that the patients were suffering. Pou agreed that she administered the drugs to prevent another terrible day for the patients. Cook agreed that the drugs killed the patients by stopping their respiration system. They assumed that the patients were going to a better place. A modern christian would believe that the doctors did not take in consideration the state of the soul. Meaning, the person may not have been in a state where they went to heaven, therefore the doctors sent them to a place of deeper misery. The doctors handled the situation in the interest of the staff but not in the best interest of the patients or the patients
“In quixotically trying to conquer death doctors all too frequently do no good for their patients’ “ease” but at the same time they do harm instead by prolonguing and even magnifying patients’ dis-ease.”
Starting with the argument of it not being ethical, Martin Levin a practicing attorney states; that when he first began his paper and research he believed people should have the right to an assisted suicide. After doing extensive research he changed his mind. Just some of these reasons include sanctity of human life. It is stated that God created the human life and therefore our lives and bodies are the property of God. It is also stated that no one has the right to destroy Gods’ property (Levin M. 2002). In many churches ho...
I understand that the nation’s history has long prohibited and shunned suicide, but in my opinion this is different. This is a more dignified death, which deals with personal autonomy. I understand the fears that the different states have regarding legalizing assisted suicide. However, other countries as well as some of the states have legalized it. It has not caused mass assisted suicides and I believe that it could be done in such a way that does not comprise the patient doctor trust. I am not saying that I condone assisted suicide for everyone, but it needs to be an option for people. I think that if abortion is an option, then assisted suicide should be too.
Jack Kevorkian, a former pathologist said, “ Everyone has a right for suicide, because a person has a right to determine what will or will not be done to his body” (“Should Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal?”). That's true, everybody should be able to determine what happens to their body. Geoffrey N. Fieger, a attorney for Dr. Kevorkian, said, “a law which does not make anybody do anything, that gives people the right to decide, and prevents the state from prosecuting you for exercising your freedom not to suffer, violates somebody else’s constitutional rights is insane” (“The Right to Assisted Suicide). Then Ronald Dworkin, a person that witnessed a woman in pain, ask for assisted suicide, said “whatever view we take about, we want the right to decide for ourselves” (“The Right to Assisted Suicide”). This is showing that people want to be able to make their own decisions with their body. If they or somebody they know wants to make the decision to go with assisted suicide, they want to be able to do that. Therefore assisted suicide should become legal because people want to, and should be able to make their own decisions with their
Imagine a scenario where you’re in tremendous pain and you want to end the pain before death comes over you. Even if you wanted to make that choice, the government of the United States has already made this choice for you by illegalizing what is called assisted suicide. There are 3 different kinds of suicide involving the assistance of others; assisted suicide, euthanasia and passive euthanasia, and mercy killing, these came to be a hot topic during the 1990s when doctors and nurses started going to jail because of helping their patients kill themselves, not for financial gain but because it was the humane and just thing to do(Ackerman). As a human we are given the right to life as an infant, so shouldn’t by default we be given the right to die? Assisted suicide should be legal for many reasons, because of our freedoms and liberties, to lessen the amount of end of life pain and to save money.
He describes how the doctors can change the patient’s views and how they can shape them according to what they believe is right and that is what happened in Godelieva’s case. In “The Death Treatment”, Aviv writes about a doctor named Distelmans, who was the proponent for making euthanasia legal for people who have incurable diseases. She also mentions that Distelmans has euthanized hundreds of people and he gives talks at schools and hospitals and other events. Distelmans is influencing people to do euthanasia, even though there are other solutions and treatments available for these people to resolve their problems. Godelieva visited Distelmans and a few months later, she decided to file for euthanasia. Before meeting him, Godelieva was depressed; however, she didn’t have thoughts about ending her life as Aviv mentions that in her diary Godelieva wrote that, “She couldn’t comprehend why her husband would kill
Today's society is now introduced to one of the most controversial issues; assisted suicide. Just like in other controversial arguments, there are many people that feel that it is wrong for people to ask their healthcare provider to end one's life; while others feel that if the person is terminally ill and has given their will to die, that they can be assisted in suicide. Though both sides are reasonable many people believe that people should not take part in helping someone take their own life, assisted suicide should be legal because, it plays a factor of conquering one’s feelings, gives an option to those whom are terminally ill or in immense pain, and every human
Suicide and assisted suicide is often viewed as the most logical choice when faced with these circumstances. As far back as the 16th Century, people have been arguing for the terminally ill to be aided in ending life by physicians who should not be held morally or legally to blame for assisting the individual. The beginning of the 21rst Century saw many bills supporting the use of euthanasia proposed in many Western legislatures with little to no success. The fact is that everyone is going to die, the only question that remains to be answered is when, how, and under what conditions. Supporters of euthanasia state that everyone should have the same degree of control in choosing the circumstances surrounding their death as they do in choosing the manner in which they live” (Economist.com, 1997) I agree with this assertion, everyone should be able to choose their own
Physician -assisted suicide has been a conflict in the medical field since pre- Christian eras, and is an issue that has resurfaced in the twentieth century. People today are not aware of what the term physician assisted suicide means, and are opposed to listening to advocates’ perspectives. Individuals need to understand that problems do not go away by not choosing to face them. This paper’s perspective of assisted suicide is that it is an option to respect the dignity of patients, and only those with deathly illness are justified for this method.
There are some arguments for assisted suicide and Respect for autonomy is one of them. A competent person should have the right to choose to live or die. Justice is another. Competent terminally ill patients are allowed to hasten their deaths by refusal of medication. Physician assisted suicide may be a compassionate response to unbearable sufferings. Although society has a strong interest in preserving life, that interest lessens when a person is terminally ill and has a strong desire to end life. Lastly, legalization of assisted suicide would promote open discussion. These arguments make it hard to go along with the arguments against assisted suicide.
Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates currently circulating in America. Physician assisted suicide allows a patient to be informed, including counseling about and prescribing lethal doses of drugs, and allowed to decide, with the help of a doctor, to commit suicide. There are so many questions about assisted suicide and no clear answers. Should assisted suicide be allowed only for the terminally ill, or for everyone? What does it actually mean to assist in a suicide? What will the consequences of legalizing assisted suicide be? What protection will there be to protect innocent people? Is it (morally) right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is one’s own right.
Although euthanasia and assisted suicide are frowned upon, legalizing euthanasia and assisted suicide would be beneficial to society. Through many forms of euthanasia and assisted suicide, people choose to end their own lives to relieve their suffering, to keep their autonomy and their desire to be able to perform their daily activities, and to prevent the fear of burdening their family. Even though euthanasia and assisted suicide are not considered the norm by doctors, the goal of a doctor should be to relieve the pain of a patient in any way the patient requests.