The War on Terror And the Need to Proceed with Diplomacy

2102 Words9 Pages
The War on Terror And the Need to Proceed with Diplomacy

We last met in an hour of shock and suffering. In four short months, our nation has comforted the victims, began to rebuild New York and the Pentagon, rallied a great coalition, captured, arrest, and rid the world of thousands of terrorists, destroyed Afghanistan’s terrorists training camps, saved a people from starvation, and freed a country from brutal oppression (applause).

- President G.W. Bush, State of the Union Address, January 29th 2002

President Bush, in response to the tragic happenings of September 11th, pointed the finger of blame at Osama Bin Laden and the Al Qaeda terrorist network. Now that our retaliatory war effort in Afghanistan has been underway for some time, our President’s attention now shifts toward other countries. Given that our nation is already responding militarily to September 11th, against terrorist groups in Afghanistan, many Americans now wonder why much of the media, and the President himself, now suggest that Iraq, Iran, and North Korea are the next countries in line to be dealt with. Our nation’s highest ranking leader wants to prepare the country for an expanded war on terror. However, before agreeably following his lead, Americans should first critically question many aspects of his foreign policy strategy. A closer look calls into question whether or not escalating war would be the best course of action.

When addressing the nation, during his state of the union address, President Bush used strategical rhetoric in an attempt to gain support for any futuristic actions America might take in the next phase of the war. In reference to Iraq, Iran, and North Korea, President Bush said,

States like these, and their terrorist all...

... middle of paper ...

...oil resources in Iraq’s region of the world. Different politicians have their own ideas as to where our oil deposits should come from. Most of them have their own political agenda and seek ways to act in their countries interest, and often times their own as well. Thinking critically about the motives leaders have in furthering their ideas leads to discovering why it is that they say the things they do.

Tensions ensue as the United States’ unwavering support for Israel hinders neighboring countries from penetrating Israel to the full extent. It follows that our friendship with Israel closely connects our nation to conflicts that may arise in the Middle East. The academic journal National Review notes that countries surrounding Israel have historically wanted to witness the country’s demise. The fact remains that Israel has nuclear weapon capabilities, and so out.

More about The War on Terror And the Need to Proceed with Diplomacy

Open Document